BBG-3/4 Zero-G Stadium Attack Type Discussion
(Oct. 07, 2012 1:09 PM)Ginga Blader Wrote: Aha, nope. Though I might just go to TRU, and pick up a Grand Cetus.Do you have JSB? If so, could you try some Attack, Force Smash, and Sway KO combos with it? And possibly comparison tests with JB? And possibly try a similar test with BSF vs. SF? Thanks!
And about what you said, B has better Stamina than SB, IIRC.
But I could test 160SB.
I managed to do some testing today of some combos I thought would to well.
They are:MF L-Drago Destroy ED145XF (Attack-Destabiliser-Spin Stealer) and MF Gravity Perseus T125MF (Attack-Destabiliser-Spin Stealer).
Equipment-Beylauncher LR
Beylauncher R
Zero-G attack stadium.
Note-All beys are TT.
MF LDD(Absorb mode) ED145XF vs Ifraid Ifraid 160SB(I think its supposed to be a defence set-up)
LDD: 10 wins (6 OS, 4 KO)
Ifraid:10 wins (2 KO, 7 OS, 1 ZA)
LDD win:50%
Spin stealing was much easier because by the time LDD starts to spin steal, Ifraid was also getting destabilised at the same time.
MF GP(counter mode, attack ver.)T125MF vs Ifraid Ifraid 160SB
GP: 12 wins ( 9 OS, 3 KO)
Ifraid : 8 wins (5 KO, 3 OS)
GP win: 60%
1 draw redone.
GP KOed several times due to its recoil and weight. I don't have Dragoon, but maybe t might do better.
MF GP(counter mode, attack ver.)T125MF vs Phantom Cancer AD145B(Stamina if I'm not wrong.
GP: 12 wins ( 8 OS, 4 KO)
Cancer : 8 wins (7 KO, 1 OS)
3 Draws redone.
GP win: 60%
More of the same.
Conclusions:
GP seems to do well, but Dragoon should do much better.
LDD does fine, but ED145 messes it up some times.I try using D125 next time maybe. LDG might do well too based on LDD performance.
XF is definenatly not uncontrollable.
MF does great. I don't think RF would do better.
They are:MF L-Drago Destroy ED145XF (Attack-Destabiliser-Spin Stealer) and MF Gravity Perseus T125MF (Attack-Destabiliser-Spin Stealer).
Equipment-Beylauncher LR
Beylauncher R
Zero-G attack stadium.
Note-All beys are TT.
MF LDD(Absorb mode) ED145XF vs Ifraid Ifraid 160SB(I think its supposed to be a defence set-up)
LDD: 10 wins (6 OS, 4 KO)
Ifraid:10 wins (2 KO, 7 OS, 1 ZA)
LDD win:50%
Spin stealing was much easier because by the time LDD starts to spin steal, Ifraid was also getting destabilised at the same time.
MF GP(counter mode, attack ver.)T125MF vs Ifraid Ifraid 160SB
GP: 12 wins ( 9 OS, 3 KO)
Ifraid : 8 wins (5 KO, 3 OS)
GP win: 60%
1 draw redone.
GP KOed several times due to its recoil and weight. I don't have Dragoon, but maybe t might do better.
MF GP(counter mode, attack ver.)T125MF vs Phantom Cancer AD145B(Stamina if I'm not wrong.
GP: 12 wins ( 8 OS, 4 KO)
Cancer : 8 wins (7 KO, 1 OS)
3 Draws redone.
GP win: 60%
More of the same.
Conclusions:
GP seems to do well, but Dragoon should do much better.
LDD does fine, but ED145 messes it up some times.I try using D125 next time maybe. LDG might do well too based on LDD performance.
XF is definenatly not uncontrollable.
MF does great. I don't think RF would do better.
Check out my thread for MF-M Diablo Kerbecs E230 CF!
can someone test tr145? i wanna see if it has sway potential
(Oct. 19, 2012 3:53 PM)$__AJ__$ Wrote:I can try MSF Revizer Revizer 160SB/JSB and Phantom Cancer W145WD if you want(Oct. 19, 2012 12:04 PM)Bobmcdoogal Wrote:(Oct. 19, 2012 5:56 AM)$__AJ__$ Wrote: can someone test tr145? i wanna see if it has sway potentialI can try that.
So it'll be MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF vs ?
MSF Saramanda^2 w145 mb or any good stamina zero g.
(Oct. 19, 2012 9:16 PM)Bobmcdoogal Wrote:revizer^2 plz!(Oct. 19, 2012 3:53 PM)$__AJ__$ Wrote:I can try MSF Revizer Revizer 160SB/JSB and Phantom Cancer W145WD if you want(Oct. 19, 2012 12:04 PM)Bobmcdoogal Wrote: I can try that.
So it'll be MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF vs ?
MSF Saramanda^2 w145 mb or any good stamina zero g.
(Oct. 19, 2012 9:16 PM)Bobmcdoogal Wrote:(Oct. 19, 2012 3:53 PM)$__AJ__$ Wrote:I can try MSF Revizer Revizer 160SB/JSB and Phantom Cancer W145WD if you want(Oct. 19, 2012 12:04 PM)Bobmcdoogal Wrote: I can try that.
So it'll be MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF vs ?
MSF Saramanda^2 w145 mb or any good stamina zero g.
Um WD fails in this stadium so I suggest not. WB maybe for the tip.
Yes, RR would be the overall better choice against sway.
K I'll try MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF vs MSF Revizer Revizer 160JSB
I wanted to try it againest JSB because it might have the same results as SB or even better or worse
I wanted to try it againest JSB because it might have the same results as SB or even better or worse
By the way guys, a nice combo for a stamina and defense hybrid would be Duo/Dragooon Dragooon/any Synchrome with Dragooon on top ED145 (WD145 is not a sub) RS. The free spinning ED145 scrapes but survives extremely well because it do not affect spin. I will be testing this weekend, with a thread coming soon.
Zero-G Defense Bottom Comparatives
Conditions: (Click to View)
Zero-G Attackers: (Click to View)
Smash Attackers: (Click to View)
Awesome tests man. Very useful.
(Oct. 19, 2012 5:56 AM)*AJ* Wrote: can someone test tr145? i wanna see if it has sway potentialOk here are the results
Equipement:
Zero-G Attack Stadium
Launcher Grip
Grip Support
Grip Rubber
Metal Assist
Beypointer
Launcher Rubber
BeyLauncher LR
MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF vs MSF Revizer Revizer 160JSB
MSF Ifraid Ifraid TR145CF: 4 wins(1 KO and 3 ZA) Winning Percentage:20%
MSF Revizer Revizer 160JSB: 16 wins(All OS) Winning Percentage: 80%
Ties: 2
(Oct. 26, 2012 1:26 AM)*Ginga* Wrote: By the way guys, a nice combo for a stamina and defense hybrid would be Duo/Dragooon Dragooon/any Synchrome with Dragooon on top ED145 (WD145 is not a sub) RS. The free spinning ED145 scrapes but survives extremely well because it do not affect spin. I will be testing this weekend, with a thread coming soon.
What about WA130? It has the same effect, but the Bey is lower.
And your point is? If it is lower, it is all the more likely to scrape.
His point is that it has the same gimmick. No complicated meaning that you seem to be looking for. Anyway you shouldn't discard it so quickly. Although it is lower and has the same general gimmick it's not like the two tracks are exactly the same. Have you ever even tried it in the stadium *Ginga*?
No, I havn't, I do not own WA130. Though when my sister had it, I remember its overall design. It is to sharp, if you will, i.e., not round enough. The nice part about ED145 is that it is rounded more, for more LAD, as much as that is possible in ZG. XD
(Oct. 30, 2012 11:12 PM)Insomniac Wrote: Zero-G Defense Bottom Comparatives
Conditions: (Click to View)
Zero-G Attackers: (Click to View)
Smash Attackers: (Click to View)
May I also test some of these bottoms, I have been wanting to see how other bottoms also react in the Zero-G Stadium for Anti-Sway Defense.
Sure, it'd be great if somebody could validate my tests.
What about DF145, the DF supposed to keep the bey grouded, so it might stay more to the middle and not get stadium outs so much. Also 145 is a middle height track, wich may reduce scrape.
P.S. If someone suggested this already then sorry.
P.S. If someone suggested this already then sorry.
It just does not work that way.
Read the article on the part, and you'll see why.
Read the article on the part, and you'll see why.