Questions about the WBO

I'm fairly sure it does... GuardianRevizer's sig got deleted, and it had a 500x200 pic and several lines of text.
It does.

That's the reason why I started using 300x100 signatures with 3-4 lines of text below it.
100 + 3x16 = 148 px tall by 300 wide.

I have a large tag in a spoiler, and it doesn't count towards the 500x200 px mark, cause it's not viewable.

1 px should be fine, I'd be really surprised if Kai-V or anyone deleted a sig with a 201 height.
No, I asked if I could have a line of text under my old 500x200 signature, and she said no.
(Sep. 27, 2013  12:40 AM)Ultramarine Wrote: No, I asked if I could have a line of text under my old 500x200 signature, and she said no.
the sig would then be 500x218 px since text doesn't just add 1px to your signature. Cannon is a rebel Wink lol jk he's a mod.
(Sep. 26, 2013  5:07 PM)The Bishop Wrote:
(Sep. 26, 2013  2:02 PM)Lazer Wrote: ay yie yie this is how rumors start... anyway how do you know exactly when the text in you sig is over 500x200 pixels?

Quote:it's pretty simple, a line of text is usually 10 px tall, well, usually (based on what my ICT teacher taught me). So you just add 10 for every single line of text (unbolded, etc.) to the amount of pixels your signature is.

It has been determined that the text contained in your signature dose not count toward your 500 x 200 px limit. (only images)

..... so go crazy.

Hm, no, I think I even specified to you in a topic that text also definitely counted inside the limit.
(Aug. 29, 2013  11:48 PM)*Ginga* Wrote: Yo, it is only measured by image size.

IMO 500x200 is a little big.

I have gotten conflicting answers... Thanks for clearing that up Kai-V

Rules are Rules, everyone should be following them you'll probably see a lot more reports by me in the coming future.

FYI - Cake your signature is too large
my sig just got deleted Unhappy oh and I'm having some trouble I'm trying to post the updates in the anti-attack thread but everytime I try to it combines into my last post and noone will se it Unhappy
That means you're posting to quickly after you just posted.
(Sep. 27, 2013  3:11 AM)Ultramarine Wrote: That means you're posting to quickly after you just posted.

To add on, it also means that he's double posting too, so it keeps adding on to the original.
Lazer, just edit your posts. It will get seen sooner later and it's their choice to choose if they want to respond or not.
I know but sometimes the post was like a day or a week old and if I edit my last then nobody would no it was there Unhappy
(Sep. 27, 2013  3:16 AM)Lazer Wrote: I know but sometimes the post was like a day or a week old and if I edit my last then nobody would no it was there Unhappy
people will see it, it is just whether or not they choose to respond. They may not respond because either they are unsure what to say or they just don't really care. Just edit your last post from now on and try not to spam Smile It isn't a big deal really if no one responds sometimes, but it doesn't exactly mean that no one saw it.
uhhh the weirdest thing just happened the post I just made here got meshed with the one I made in beyblade parts testing requests....?????? help?
(Sep. 27, 2013  3:43 AM)Lazer Wrote: uhhh the weirdest thing just happened the post I just made here got meshed with the one I made in beyblade parts testing requests....?????? help?

Could you please show pictures ? I highly doubt that's probable.
I'm guessing maybe he posted in the wrong thread thinking it was here.
Erm...how come my signature is suddenly too large? I never had an issue with that before.
It was just realised to be too large. Mods don't always notice that a signature is too large right away, as they're very busy.
(Sep. 27, 2013  1:10 PM)The Supreme One Wrote: Erm...how come my signature is suddenly too large? I never had an issue with that before.

Because someone ended up reporting 9 people's signatures.

I really don't have an issue with signatures being a few pixels bigger, but it's quite ridiculous that some users' face collection extend far greater than the signature limit ..
(Sep. 27, 2013  5:54 AM)Cannon Wrote:
(Sep. 27, 2013  3:43 AM)Lazer Wrote: uhhh the weirdest thing just happened the post I just made here got meshed with the one I made in beyblade parts testing requests....?????? help?

Could you please show pictures ? I highly doubt that's probable.
no seriuosly the reply I was making got
'd into the post I had just made in beyblade parts testing requests...

oh and Cannon I know right Arupeo faces stretch down farther then your sig and my sig combined....
(Sep. 27, 2013  2:06 PM)Cannon Wrote: Because someone ended up reporting 9 people's signatures.

I really don't have an issue with signatures being a few pixels bigger, but it's quite ridiculous that some users' face collection extend far greater than the signature limit ..
I didn't think my sig was too big...either that, or it got resized when I uploaded it. Will I be getting it back?
A signature does not only consist of a picture ... That is just called a "signature picture". A signature includes everything, including text lines, space between those text lines, etc.

No, your signature was completely removed and not saved, so you would have to rebuild it.
(Sep. 27, 2013  2:06 PM)Cannon Wrote: Because someone ended up reporting 9 people's signatures.

I really don't have an issue with signatures being a few pixels bigger, but it's quite ridiculous that some users' face collection extend far greater than the signature limit ..

I also agree there should be a set amount of displayable faces, but we will save that one for another day.
Faces are also something earned, and to be proud of. (anyone can plop in a signature)

Yes everyone, beware the signature Nazi. Your signatures are no longer safe.

And as i stated before, Go ahead an PM me and i will certainly help anyone re-size there there awful giant eyesore signature.
ello, sorry for bringing this issue up again, but it seems i can't use flickr for my sig pics anymore either. apparently my pic of a blue inferno hell kerbecs with text in said pic got deleted without alerting me, photobucket won't let me do anything without giving me a square saying "this user has either deleted or removed this picture" and puush is glitching on me and saying something else is using it. if anyone knows a picture sharing service that isn't a piece of carp (censored myself there on purpose Tongue_out) that would be really helpful, as apparently puush, flickr, and photobucket are worth about the same as a completely trashed beyond repair bey, to use a beyblade
simile. so if anyone could help me find a picture sharing service not worth carp (censored myself again Tongue_out), i would really appreciate it.
I use Picasa, and it's very good.
thanks but apparently it's not compatible with windows 8. should've mentioned i have that first sorry. XD

nvm, found one sorry, i got so frustrated i forgot to search it myself. using imgur now and it should work fine. ty anyways for all your time and effort.