Alright, I have some testing here for SWD vs. WD:
Quote:Earth Cancer AD145SWD vs. Earth Cancer AD145WD
Beys alternated launching first, parts swapped, yadda yadda yadda...
Earth Cancer AD145SWD: wins, 5/20 (all OS)
Earth cancer AD145WD: wins, 15/29 (all OS)
Earth Cancer AD145SWD win rate: 25%
Er... Yah. I reeeeeaaally don't like SWD. XD The only reason I think it won at all is because one of the part sets was vastly superior to the other. Its late-game performance was painful to watch, and even the few wins it pulled off in the first half when it was launched first were only by a couple wobbly, floor-scraping rotations. WD's wins were all super clean.
Has anyone else gotten different results? 'Cause if there are more I would really like to see them. Our experiences seem conflicting.
As for the list of notes and such...
Cosmic is trash on LTAC. I'm just gonna come right out and say it. XD It has like no upper smash at all. It works amazing on R145, but using it on 105- is just a bad idea IMO. It also does amazing on CH120, though TR145 is a bit too lacking in terms of smash for my taste.
For Tracks on Wyvang, I'd go for GB/H145. I've tried them both and they work pretty well. I have also looked into Wyvang LTAC briefly, and it,s impressed me. Someone should formally test that.
As for Beat LTAC, I've seen some nice results from Leone19. I might actually have to try this out right now...
Benchmark!!
Quote:Cosmic Unicorn II R145R2F vs. Earth Aquario 85RSF
Cosmic launched first on all launches.
Cosmic: wins, 11/20 (All KO)
Earth: wins, 9/20 (2 KO, 7 KO)
Cosmic Unicorno II R145R2F win crate: 55%
Yerp. Dat's good old' Cosmic for ya.
Quote:Beat Byxis 90R2F vs. Earth Aquario 85RSF
Beat launched first on all launches.
Beat: wins, 7/20 (All KO)
Earth: wins, 13/20 (1 KO, 12 OS)
Beat By is 90R2F win rate: 35%
Er... Yah. This is literally the only testing I've ever done with this, so I'm hesitant to give my opinion, but so far I'm personally not too crazy about it. Again, very little experience. This isn't much to go on compared to the testing that's been done already.
I have tested Nightmare for Anti-Attack, and it's actually pretty darn good. Once we get a good amount of formal testing I think we'll see some very promising numbers. I haven't tried it that much, but enough to expect decent results.
I agree that Zero-G wheels are relatively under tested ATM. Going by how each does in Standard, I think we can narrow down Wyvang, Bahamdia, and Balro as priorities for testing. I've tested them all briefly, and they seem promising. They could very potentially be added later.
As for Zero-G Defense, I am horribly unimpressed with it, especially with Reviser. The thing can only spin for like 30 seconds. Not only is it easier to KO than your average Defense type, but it has serious trouble on top of that with out-spinning opposing attackers. I really don't like it at all. Killerken's shape is just too recoily to work without the extra 30 grams you get out of a Synchrom. Overall, I haven't had a very good experience with them.
Sorry I didn't go into more detail, but I have to type this with a really annoying touch keyboard. XD