(Mar. 24, 2012 12:24 AM)Universe² Wrote: I can do some DF105 testing when I get home tomorrow (Im at a friend's).
K, I got home and here they are
MF-H Flash Capricorne DF105RF vs. MF-H Duo Aquario BD145CS
Standard Procedure
Same RF from last test, so kind of used, but still very much great
CS is calm
Used Capricorne for teh LOLs
Flash: 16 Wins (16 KO, 0 OS)
Duo: 4 Wins (1 KO, 3 OS)
1 Draw, Redone
Flash Win Percentage: 80%
Yeah..KaotiK's results don't seem very accurate to me...Flash loses were from times it couldn't get a OHKO-2HKO.
Hm. Not as good as GB145, though, and GB145 would have the advantage against TH170 tracks (though TH195 is always troublesome for 145 heights).
AD145 tests would be interesting, especially AD145MF in anyone wants to?
Testing with 135 would also be interesting.
Primal: Could you do S130 tests, and any 105 track, if that's not too much.
I think D125 is probably a shoe-in at this point.
What I'm leaning towards:
MF/MF-H Flash (CW's Undecided. May default to Sagittario 2, but Quetz and Escolpio would be worth considering especially on lower tracks)
105/CH120/125/130/GB145/H145 RF/MF
With perhaps a note that any gimmicked versions of the height-only tracks will also work adequately (though LW105 is probably questionable), otherwise we get this mess:
MF/MF-H Flash Saggitario/Quetzalcoatl/Escolpio 105/W105/DF105/CH120/125/D125/T125/130/S130/W130/GB145/H145 MF/RF
As well as perhaps 135 and AD145, I mean jeez.
Flash is just too good to narrow down track wise, honestly, almost any track from 105-145 is competitively as long as it doesn't have poor synergy (R145, BD145)...
I would be interested in hearing what other Advanced members were thinking about it, but I don't know if it's worth double posting over there to ask...
Heck, those of you that have tested it a fair bit in this thread (say, tested a few different setups for us), I'd be interested in your thoughts on the optimum tracks, just make sure to explain your choices as thoroughly as possible.