So what, Deikailo, you knew that it had happened in London when you did it ? I believe that neither the Committee nor you had any idea that it had been done in London too before recently, because I certainly had absolutely no idea. While the discussion was open in his eyes, Blitz never mentioned anything about what happened in London before we questioned him about it days ago, when we learned about it.
How can you expect us to just discuss things in a topic open to the public's eyes ? We got both Bluezee's testimony and yours, and we had to discuss it within the Committee since it is the Committee who made the Rulebooks. There is absolutely no need to leave it open to everybody when we know both what Bluezee saw and what you saw. You all take us for stupid dirt that cannot imagine the plethora of different points of view and opinions that people might get but yo, we did, it is possible.
Honestly I still stand by the points we made within our Committee discussion which led us to think that the match should only be voided, not processed (positive for Deikailo), but no penalty (positive for Bluezee). However, because a new element came up from people who apparently were not transparent either and that I can count on one hand the number of days when I sincerely learned this element, then we will probably process that match because it apparently happened in several other matches. But do not mention this element and bring it out as a "precedent" as if we knew about this because we did not. Our discussion happened without knowing there were already many precedents because we had no idea. This is something that we never got told, not something we never told you all. Stop accusing us of being 'opaque', because I always try to answer everything and it is a fact that I never lie, so I have nothing to hide, and I believe in our Committee enough that I think neither of us do.
So, if you want to talk about transparency, point to the whole community.
By the way, are you really blaming the future, possible second hiatus of Beyblade and the inevitable lack of activity in the whole Beyblade community across the world because of our supposed lack of transparency, or just generally on us ? Incredible.
How can you expect us to just discuss things in a topic open to the public's eyes ? We got both Bluezee's testimony and yours, and we had to discuss it within the Committee since it is the Committee who made the Rulebooks. There is absolutely no need to leave it open to everybody when we know both what Bluezee saw and what you saw. You all take us for stupid dirt that cannot imagine the plethora of different points of view and opinions that people might get but yo, we did, it is possible.
Honestly I still stand by the points we made within our Committee discussion which led us to think that the match should only be voided, not processed (positive for Deikailo), but no penalty (positive for Bluezee). However, because a new element came up from people who apparently were not transparent either and that I can count on one hand the number of days when I sincerely learned this element, then we will probably process that match because it apparently happened in several other matches. But do not mention this element and bring it out as a "precedent" as if we knew about this because we did not. Our discussion happened without knowing there were already many precedents because we had no idea. This is something that we never got told, not something we never told you all. Stop accusing us of being 'opaque', because I always try to answer everything and it is a fact that I never lie, so I have nothing to hide, and I believe in our Committee enough that I think neither of us do.
So, if you want to talk about transparency, point to the whole community.
By the way, are you really blaming the future, possible second hiatus of Beyblade and the inevitable lack of activity in the whole Beyblade community across the world because of our supposed lack of transparency, or just generally on us ? Incredible.