(Feb. 17, 2021 2:59 AM)Eclipse Force Wrote:(Feb. 17, 2021 2:35 AM)Vtryuga Wrote: Come on dude I haven't been trying to put you guys down. I just pointed the fact that the automatic inclusion of metal doesn't make it bad. It is merely much more complicated than that.
Also you can't just apply that logic everywhere. Mfb beys are much more dense as well as have a compact mass distribution. (If you were joking then my bad lol)
I am aware that the inclusion of metal drivers CAN POSE a problem if the spring is a bit tighter than dash drivers and that it really depends on TT's design. ( there could even be a warning not to use those drivers with some beys.)
Also seeing TTs stupidity in the past it can definitely happen lol. Testing is required is the only solution after all.
sorry if i was rude in any of the above replies.
The battle is already over but seeing as you’re smart and I’m not I have genuine question. What impact would the tension of dash drivers have along with metal since it’s a more dense material, so I would imagine it would have a different outcome.
It will definitely have a negative outcome for the teeth. As they will be under a lot of stress from metal. ( as it is much stronger)
I cannot really comment on the actual wear on teeth as I do not know if they are at their elastic limit already. If they are close to it then I suppose that it makes sense that the teeth will wear fast . If they are not close then it will take more time to wear.
I really cannot comment unless we have actual data. But looking at the way they advertised these drivers I would recommend testing. Most probably these drivers will be a little worse in teeth wear.
My original post was that just because of metal inclusion doesnt mean it becomes 10 times worse. (Although looking at it now I may have mis worded it) it is actually very complicated ( even i really dont know the exact details as I am in the first year.) and depends on various factor.
Looking at the arguments by BladerGem he does put up a lot of valid points. Tt has known to make a lot of mistakes and I am not sure if they thought about it that very much.
Btw it was a nice discussion finally seeing the theory being applied to practical use.
I cant wait to see testing.
The beauty of science is unless we have experimental data I cannot claim to be 100% right too.
All im saying is that I can be wrong too and that it is always possible that there is an error in my reasoning. So it will be prudent to wait untill testing results come in.
(Feb. 17, 2021 3:23 AM)The Blacknight Wrote: just a quick question: doesnt the burst mechanism work by tabs on the driver inserted into teeth, and force pushing down on the spring, allowing for a diagonal motion because of cenrifugal force(which is why tt tabs are bigger than hasbro tabs)? wouldn't this mean that the less flexible metal would pash against and wear the teeth down more than plastic? if the tabs are plastic, fine, but if not, isn't that kinda a problem? or maybe the burst mechanism works totally differently. not a physics expert, just started learning about Newtons 3 laws and kinematic equations lol
Wait the tabs arent plastic? I only thought the rounded surface was metal?
If thats the case then it is a very bad descision by TT ( in my opinion)