There are no better beyblade forums, or even ones that are close. I'd hate to sound full of myself (which wouldn't even e the case, since I didn't make the forum, nor am I part of the committee), but there really is no rival to the WBO. A bad design won't deter people if the sites good, and that's not even the case here, since the design is nice.
Make your suggestions!
It's still secondary to the content. If users are going to look elsewhere entirely because they feel how this site looks (and it's one of the nicer looking forums I've seen tbh) then honestly, they're not the sort of person I'm too sad to not have. There are a massive number of far more important things to focus on at the moment.
I get square corners on firefox too.
(Apr. 09, 2014 10:39 PM)C a o S³ Wrote:(Apr. 09, 2014 9:46 PM)Kai-V Wrote: The rounded corners work fine for me and I always use Firefox.Quite strange, so at least I, from Firefox, can't see the rounded corners, I will let you know if this affects other users as soon as possible
I get square corners on firefox too.
I get square corners as well on Firefox.
(Apr. 10, 2014 2:12 AM)Black♧Jack Wrote:Totally agree with Dual and Th!nk. IMHO what on the WBO, at the moment, needs more attention is the security of the board. The WBO has no rival in its field, the WBO is the most important forum of beyblade for ages, if you see around the web you will never see, even remotely, a forum about beyblade which satisfies you with its contents well as the WBO do.(Apr. 10, 2014 1:10 AM)Kai-V Wrote: Aesthetics is almost never essential. It is actually secondary.
Aesthetics can be very important to people who haven't yet joined, and makes the user feel like they have more freedoms on the forum, at least that is how I see it.People who don't like the design, or feel it's outdated may not join and look for somewhere better. Why do we buy candy we've never eaten? The package makes it look good.
As Th!nk said: "It's still secondary to the content. If users are going to look elsewhere entirely because they feel how this site looks (and it's one of the nicer looking forums I've seen tbh) then honestly, they're not the sort of person I'm too sad to not have. There are a massive number of far more important things to focus on at the moment."
@Th!nk, Kujikato, ah ok! Mh, Kai-V so it is quite strange that your firefox see rounded corners, are you sure that you haven't accidentaly set a ruleset in the browser?
I wish the original Beywiki Forums layouts were still available haha.
I suggest the loser of Dark vs Kei should take a pie to the face before the end of Anime North 2014.
I suggest the previous proposal should be filmed.
I suggest the previous proposal isn't going to happen.
Hey, how about we have something like on reddit where if you are replied to or your thread is commented on you have a prompt to reply or look at whatever it is in the corner?
(Apr. 14, 2014 10:37 PM)AkioEPC Wrote: Hey, how about we have something like on reddit where if you are replied to or your thread is commented on you have a prompt to reply or look at whatever it is in the corner?
There is a MyBB plugin that would notify you if someone quoted your post, and you can always subscribe to threads, but there is always a risk that whoever replied in the topic totally ignored you and is commenting on something else.
In any case, the activity on the forums is not nearly as difficult to keep up with as in 2012, so you should be able to simply stay on the index and refresh to see if anybody replied. When we go into another 'boom' though, I will definitely consider it.
(Apr. 09, 2014 7:05 PM)C a o S³ Wrote: In future could be an interesting idea to have a new main theme blue-orange, perfectly fully compatible with all the browser engine (Kai-V, for example firefox is not fully compatible now because when who has editet the theme -if I remember correctly was Brad- didn't coded the rounded corner for it), but at the same time give the possibility to the user to choose between more template based on other colors.
*You have to add: "-moz-border-radius: value"
For every browser engine, instead:
"-moz-border-radius: value;
-webkit-border-radius: value;
-khtml-border-radius: value;
border-radius: value"
Hey, the edits are more complicated than that, but I think I just fixed it.
Really? However yes, now it works perfectly in the homepage, but it don't works in the postbit and subforum (forumdisplay)
We should have a WBO Mascot.
Blader DJ man haha. WBO's best mascot!
Oops Kai-V beat me to it.
Oops Kai-V beat me to it.
I haven't seen the Registration page in awhile, but have we taken any of these measures to prevent spambots?
Source: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ques...mbots-work
Somebody else on that site mentioned that while using some of these techniques may not permanently rid us of spammers, it could at least deter many from spamming here as opposed to some other, more easily targetable site.
(Oct. 13, 2010 5:11 PM)John Conde Wrote:(Oct. 06, 2010 7:54 PM)rlb.usa Wrote:What techniques are still valid to prevent [spambots]?
From a previous answer: You could do several things (and should be doing more then one) including:
1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if desired). You can also trap bad bots who follow a hidden link.
2) Use a CAPATCHA like reCAPTCHA
3) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.
4) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.
5) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP address.
6) Use Askimet. It is great at identifying spam.
Source: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ques...mbots-work
Somebody else on that site mentioned that while using some of these techniques may not permanently rid us of spammers, it could at least deter many from spamming here as opposed to some other, more easily targetable site.
We already tried CAPTCHA, only Administrators can create multiple accounts from the same IP address, and we do have Askimet.
We could try the mathematics question, but otherwise I have no idea what they are talking about in terms of token.
We could try the mathematics question, but otherwise I have no idea what they are talking about in terms of token.
Is the multiple account thing something new? When unregistered players show up at tournaments or a relative/friend of mine wants to play, I usually just let them make an account on my computer...
Is it the same IP address you used when you registered ? Either it changed, or you have a dynamic IP address.
It might be email addresses that are mostly proscribed from registering multiple times, since I just looked through our registration features again ... It also looks like adding a mathematics question will be harder than I thought, not to mention that apparently people do not recommend such a question since bots can bypass that as well ...
It might be email addresses that are mostly proscribed from registering multiple times, since I just looked through our registration features again ... It also looks like adding a mathematics question will be harder than I thought, not to mention that apparently people do not recommend such a question since bots can bypass that as well ...
Ah, I suppose I have a dynamic IP address then because it hasn't changed since I registered. That explains things.
Another downside to implementing a math question—judging by the ages and language of some of our members, how do we know that everyone would be capable of answering it? :p
...half kidding
Another downside to implementing a math question—judging by the ages and language of some of our members, how do we know that everyone would be capable of answering it? :p
...half kidding
I just tried something else, so let us see if it changes anything at all ...
(Jun. 18, 2014 11:19 PM)The Supreme One Wrote: Ah, I suppose I have a dynamic IP address then because it hasn't changed since I registered. That explains things.
Another downside to implementing a math question—judging by the ages and language of some of our members, how do we know that everyone would be capable of answering it? :p
...half kidding
If it hasn't changed that means you have a static IP address
The WBO Hall of Fame should be Bladers who have proven themselves in either superb Battling skills, testing, and other things. Has the WBO ever considered making a page in dedication for those Bladers?