(Dec. 16, 2013 9:36 PM)Leone19 Wrote: I had a more useable R2F, at the time. If anyone wanted to do RF tests, that'd be awesome, not sure how much the results will differ, if anything.
I chose Samurai, as at least in my opinion, it has really good synergy with Wyvang, making it the best choice for Right Spin.
Oh, fair enough then, I've been in the same situation before.
Yeah, fair enough, apparently DK is kinda recoil prone and I can see samurai being a good top crystal wheel (not to mention it being the heaviest crystal wheel IIRC), and Right Spin attack does have its advantages (chiefly that most defense types can't weak launch vs you, which could be even more important for wyvang).
Oh also, I just noticed, no MSF/MSF-H on this combo? That could also help with recoil, no?
As for gravity being left spin, I'd be curious to see which moves faster around the stadium, as right spin attack vs attack is often entirely decided by who hits the opponent from behind on the ridge, and IIRC gravity doesn't have a weight advantage over wyvang due to its CWs all being crazy light which means its usual strategy of "smash headfirst into them and KO with BULK" may not be the best idea here.
dragon King: oh idk fast moving attack type with metal on the underside vs low combo that cannot take a good hit and Samurai's slopes on a fast moving decently heavy bey vs a tall combo that can't take even a light tap kinda seems like a no brainer to me, especially as I've used Samurai offensively a little before.
Literally all we need here is someone to grab the parts and inevitably knock them both out and report back on what launch guarantees that against burn and that yes, testing these would have been a waste of time. Even that is kinda excessive, there's a reason we don't test any attack type that can KO a decent defender against standard stamina, you know.
A little more history: Even back in the golden age of MFB when this forum was at its busiest ever, we still had to be economical about testing, and I've always been very strongly against wasting testers time with frivolous requests because I know testing is pretty draining, and therefore making sure the time people have to spend on it is spent in the most efficient way possible is always going to be my priority. It surprises me that understanding that was one of the things that seemed to have slipped away as testers became fewer, but now I'm here I fully intend to do what I can to make it stick this time around.