(Apr. 02, 2012 7:09 PM)Hazel Wrote: We made this public announcement specifically so users could voice their opinions on the matter, but in absolute full awareness that the ban is completely final.
Given her status within the community, it is obviously expected that this will be difficult to understand for some users, as well, but we have laid out the facts in as neutral a manner as humanly possible.
th!nk, if I were the deciding factor here - or even one of them, really, as this was a unanimous decision regardless, your "point" would be more valid or even remotely acceptable. I have seen what everyone else in The Committee has seen, and know what they know.
I'm fully aware it's final, I don't think that anyone is that concerned about the ban itself, given she barely posts and had basically left a long time ago.
I'm afraid they don't read particularly neutrally, I've already pointed out that a couple of things make slightly more sense in context, but I'm disheartened to hear some of these myself, though again, I still need to hear more of her side of things. Again, not denying any of these personally, just want both sides to be heard before people jump to conclusions.
My point was that you stated it was "fact", and that I don't believe you are a reliable source, and, given that the entire committee is on one "side" of the argument, I don't think it is likely that any of you could be truly neutral on this issue. That sort of thing is only human though, nothing personal, though you are prone to more... Extreme, perhaps? opinions than most of the committee, or at least, are more vocal about them. No offence meant, again.
Oh and yeah, Primal, I am sure the committee has heard her entire argument, I'm just saying that I do not think it is fair that no one else has.