World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.

I would love a shout box and more ranks for members

We've already gone over shoutboxes, and we don't want to encourage too much elitiam with "ranks". We have advanced members, that is enough, honestly.


-V lolwat, ugh. Well, mods have complained not enough posts get reported, hence the suggestion, but if it's gonna result in people wasting mods time, then obviously it's not worthwhile.

Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Loool that's funny maybe the person who closes it should leave a message 'WE ARE SORRY BUT THIS THREAD IS CLOSED YOU CANNOT REPLY PLEASE SEEK ANOTHER' or something along those lines

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

sometimes, newbies report even good stuff....but I second this...

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:16 PM)DX Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

sometimes, newbies report even good stuff....but I second this...

Well, that's the reason why I say, that if the reported post is really SPAM or bad, only then should the reported post be counted.

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

KAI-V answered this question a while back..

(Jun. 03, 2011  2:59 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]People whom we see constantly reporting bad posts with a reason are usually candidates for next moderators. (Someone other than me would put a wink emoticon here.)

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:19 PM)dragoonrocks Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

KAI-V answered this question a while back..

(Jun. 03, 2011  2:59 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]People whom we see constantly reporting bad posts with a reason are usually candidates for next moderators. (Someone other than me would put a wink emoticon here.)

In that case, I am really sorry!

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:19 PM)dragoonrocks Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

KAI-V answered this question a while back..

(Jun. 03, 2011  2:59 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]People whom we see constantly reporting bad posts with a reason are usually candidates for next moderators. (Someone other than me would put a wink emoticon here.)

In that case, I am really sorry!

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:19 PM)dragoonrocks Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:10 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 10, 2011  12:35 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]Also, some newbies use the Report feature because they see that the thread is closed and they think this is the only way to respond to a post ...

Just because the mods complain that no one reports posts, why not keep a face for reporting?
If we have antique face for 1000 useful posts,
we must have some face for 500 good reported posts.
I mean, if the user did help by reporting the post, only then, should his reported post be counted for a face.
People will work hard for the face, and start reporting!

KAI-V answered this question a while back..

(Jun. 03, 2011  2:59 PM)Kai-V Wrote: [ -> ]People whom we see constantly reporting bad posts with a reason are usually candidates for next moderators. (Someone other than me would put a wink emoticon here.)

haha..count of reported post would be increasing massively atarting from the day members read kai-v's post..i bet many peoples want to become mod..lol..if i rethink about the face for reported post..that would be hard since as kai-v said earlier..people will start playing with report button and mods will be too stuffy with reported post..

But then again, normally it is the same users who constantly report posts which need to be reported. :]

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:39 PM)♥ Wrote: [ -> ]But then again, normally it is the same users who constantly report posts which need to be reported. :]

True. That's the reason why i say that these users, might be awarded with a face...

I think if i could change the WBO rules it would look a little bit like this

-a bad rip counts as a loss (if you rip bad then i think it should not count )
-self outs (self outs should not be counted either )
- all stadiums should be aloud
- old blades should be allowed
- you should not have to sign up for wbo to enter a tournament i think that would help with the none active user problem

(Jun. 12, 2011  1:57 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]I think if i could change the WBO rules it would look a little bit like this

-a bad rip counts as a loss (if you rip bad then i think it should not count )
-self outs (self outs should not be counted either )
- all stadiums should be aloud
- old blades should be allowed
- you should not have to sign up for wbo to enter a tournament i think that would help with the none active user problem

- Reshoot clause?
- Then you take "skill" out of the game.
- No, they shouldn't. That takes competitive play out of the beyrank.
- They are.
- By not signing people up, we cannot use the beyrank system. If these are your concerns, you can just do freeplay tournaments, which is still a great way to play.

(Jun. 12, 2011  2:21 AM)Deikailo Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 12, 2011  1:57 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]I think if i could change the WBO rules it would look a little bit like this

-a bad rip counts as a loss (if you rip bad then i think it should not count )
-self outs (self outs should not be counted either )
- all stadiums should be aloud
- old blades should be allowed
- you should not have to sign up for wbo to enter a tournament i think that would help with the none active user problem

- Reshoot clause?
- Then you take "skill" out of the game.
- No, they shouldn't. That takes competitive play out of the beyrank.
- They are.
- By not signing people up, we cannot use the beyrank system. If these are your concerns, you can just do freeplay tournaments, which is still a great way to play.

you only get 1 reshot claw per person and when people wear ripping they wear missing the stadium and its competitive no matter what stadium

and allowing all stadiums dose not take away skill the ones you play with are only good for attack there a 7 out of 10 chance that attacks will win unless they self K.O

(Jun. 12, 2011  2:27 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 12, 2011  2:21 AM)Deikailo Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun. 12, 2011  1:57 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]I think if i could change the WBO rules it would look a little bit like this

-a bad rip counts as a loss (if you rip bad then i think it should not count )
-self outs (self outs should not be counted either )
- all stadiums should be aloud
- old blades should be allowed
- you should not have to sign up for wbo to enter a tournament i think that would help with the none active user problem

- Reshoot clause?
- Then you take "skill" out of the game.
- No, they shouldn't. That takes competitive play out of the beyrank.
- They are.
- By not signing people up, we cannot use the beyrank system. If these are your concerns, you can just do freeplay tournaments, which is still a great way to play.

you only get 1 reshot claw per person and when people wear ripping they wear missing the stadium and its competitive no matter what stadium

and allowing all stadiums dose not take away skill the ones you play with are only good for attack there a 7 out of 10 chance that attacks will win unless they self K.O

Play in the Hasbro Engine Gear stadium and get back to me on that.

Then they should practice shooting more.

7 out of 10? You have some kind of study for this?

go on youtube and search up Wbo tournaments

(Jun. 12, 2011  3:06 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]go on youtube and search up Wbo tournaments

I've been to 13 tournaments in this calendar year alone, hosted 10 of those, and I have almost reached 100 ranked matches.

Why the hell would I need to watch edited video when a majority of those videos probably come from my tournaments?

(Jun. 12, 2011  3:06 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]go on youtube and search up Wbo tournaments

Adding up to Deikailo's post...

There are some reasons as to why all the stadiums are not kept official....The stadiums that are kept "legal" as of now, provide a fair advantage to all the various types of beyblades (attack, defense etc)..Hence they are chosen..Moreover "attack" type beyblades pretty much suck on hasbro stadiums...Man there are even no exits to allow the "attack" type beyblade to KO the other one...Hence some stadiums are kept official for a "reason"...

(Jun. 10, 2011  3:39 PM)♥ Wrote: [ -> ]But then again, normally it is the same users who constantly report posts which need to be reported. :]

I constantly report posts. Lets face it, most people don't report SPAM.

(Jun. 12, 2011  1:57 AM)Vanitas Wrote: [ -> ]I think if i could change the WBO rules it would look a little bit like this

-a bad rip counts as a loss (if you rip bad then i think it should not count )
-self outs (self outs should not be counted either )
- all stadiums should be aloud
- old blades should be allowed
- you should not have to sign up for wbo to enter a tournament i think that would help with the none active user problem

Deikailo has already given a good response, but I just want to add that I myself lost at least one of my four matches because of constant bad launches. Yet, I will still not change the rule, I admit that it must have been due to a combination of mostly bad shooting on my part and some bad luck. This is Beyblade.

I think your other suggestions show that you have no understanding of the competitive game that is Beyblade ...

could you explane to me then ? so i have a better understanding

(Jun. 15, 2011  1:19 AM)Strelok Wrote: [ -> ]could you explane to me then ? so i have a better understanding

... Read our posts on this board.

What exactly do you mean by this? Always be specific.

EDIT: Posted too late.