The ongoing debate: Defensive tracks -- is C145 still top tier?
Poll: Is C145 still top tier?
Yes, it is. |
|
147 |
No, it is not. |
|
77 |
Total: | 100% | 224 vote(s) |
I love R145, just not as a defensive track. It looses balance ridiculously easy, and scrapes the stadium floor prematurely, especially in the attack stadium.
I like it quite a bit as an attack-track though, specifically with a metal faced gravity perseus (RF)
I like it quite a bit as an attack-track though, specifically with a metal faced gravity perseus (RF)
r145 is terrible and c145 creates recoil when low attacker hit but gb145 is more stable the c145. No direspect
Contrary to popular beleif, c145 is recommended for great defense and stamina customs
No it isn't.
Especially not for stamina (and not for defense by me and various others).
Especially not for stamina (and not for defense by me and various others).
Well its on my beast custom and it beat my friends custom that had ed145 like 12 times
ED145 is worse.
In short, your friends use bad combos, and you used a slightly better one.
In short, your friends use bad combos, and you used a slightly better one.
..... maybe my custom is rock aquario c145 wb his is earth leone ed145 wd........ bt thts off topic. Point is, his costom was good........bt when i switched out c145 for ed145 a couple times and 145 some as well, i lost a lot..........coincidnce??
the top players in our local tournament used gb145 from earth virgo and a metal bottom from burn phoenix. for the face they either use earth aquila or earth virgo.
oooops sorry wrong post, so thats where i posted it.
I get far better results with C145 than ED145.
Just too much recoil with ED145 , it makes me shutter to think about it.
Just too much recoil with ED145 , it makes me shutter to think about it.
c145 way better because it will deflex ed145 works a little more then 50 percent c145 will work all the time
But ED145 is trash.
C145 is far superior.
Compared to GB145, C145 is trash.
Compared to GB145, ED145 is mega trash.
C145 is far superior.
Compared to GB145, C145 is trash.
Compared to GB145, ED145 is mega trash.
My beyblade hate c145 so much it destroyed the claws. All three!
OK, isn't C145 for repelling low attackers? And isn't GB145 better for taller attackers? Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't this conversation be irrelevant unless we had another option for repelling low attackers? 'Cause it seems like we're comparing a platypus to a cat.
(Oct. 24, 2010 11:29 PM)Themailman Wrote: OK, isn't C145 for repelling low attackers? And isn't GB145 better for taller attackers? Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't this conversation be irrelevant unless we had another option for repelling low attackers? 'Cause it seems like we're comparing a platypus to a cat.
Not really. Unless it's at the 85/90 height, IIRC C145 only had a one win advantage out of 10/20 compared to GB145 against low attackers, and fared horribly against high attackers.
But, aren't most top-tier attackers super low? So, over all wouldn't that be more adventitious for defense/stamina?
There's plenty of high-tracked attack combos.
GB145 makes all the other 145 tracks look like carp, including this one. GB is far superior. Is this a good part? yes? is it top tier? no