This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Valkyrie is unlikely due to the election thing coming up

If you have a cat that does not know how to take care of it, please visit our website Chochomeo

...

Don’t quote it

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Let's remember that Valkyrie has Rubber then plastic pattern

---

*****Driver*****

---

Join My Team Galaxy Hamsters

[img][/img]

Hypothetical Names for new Superking beys

Twister Wyvern Hurricane Atomic Metal 1D
Scythe Deathscyther J' 1A
Zone Xcalibur 1'D Ir' 1D (they did this with Diabolos by giving it Single Chassis)
Reform Genesis Hy 1D

---

PFP: Baby picture of me and one of my irl friends / ANY PRONOUNS

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

i mean the Xplosion name sounds great but why you used it is incorrect we have Brave ring and Bushin ring that only works for gt alone and sparking alone plus this pattern has already been broken with the soon to come hyperion burn and helios volcano

Predictions for December RB

Eternal Odax 7 High Blow' 1S

Spoiler (Click to View)

Odax's chip has a metal sparking chip core along with metal on the chip itself.
Eternal is somewhat small but features 4 large blades. They are plastic with a little metal under them.
7 and 1S provide balance, and High Blow is an ode to its original Blow tip.

Quake Khalzar 4 Hunter' 4A

Spoiler (Click to View)

Khalzar is a standard chip with standard chip core.
Quake features The main beak blade, with 4 smaller blades. It has the usual teal based color scheme.
4A is a double chassis. When the disc part of twists to a certain point, a bulky, metal beak blade will pop out. Its location is under the plastic on on Quake.
Its overall shape it similar to Under.

---

Imagine if Ranboo.23 has all of the beys as prize like so all fans are super happy

Kulukan
Xcalibur
Deathscizer
Odin
Valkyrie
And I dunno

---

Join My Team Galaxy Hamsters

[img][/img]

Imagine if Ranboo.23 has all of the beys as prize like so all fans are super happy

Kulukan
Xcalibur
Deathscizer
Odin
Valkyrie
And I dunno

??? Kulukan 2B hunter’
??? Xcalibur 4A 1’ dagger (quadruple sabers) iron’
??? Deathscizer 4A (right spin 3A essentially) hunter metal
??? Odin 1D blitz xtreme’
??? Valkyrie ultimate reboot’ +U

---

Hypothetical Names for new Superking beys

Twister Wyvern Hurricane Atomic Metal 1D
Scythe Deathscyther J' 1A
Zone Xcalibur 1'D Ir' 1D (they did this with Diabolos by giving it Single Chassis)
Reform Genesis Hy 1D

I think if this is a regular booster then we would get new chassis so here’s what I would do
Twister Wyvern 3D ratchet atomic metal (weak spring)
Scythe Deathscyther 5A (same “gimmick” as 3A) Hunter Metal
Zone Xcalibur 4A 1’D (quadruple saber) Iron’
Reform Genesis hybrid (chassis fused with ring for Mugen lock).

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

i mean the Xplosion name sounds great but why you used it is  incorrect we have Brave ring and Bushin ring that only works for gt alone and sparking alone plus this pattern has already been broken with the soon to come hyperion burn and helios volcano

One thing to keep in mind with Hyperion Burn is that the Burn Ring/Base isn't compatible with a Chassis, whilst Brave is compatible with Chassis so it makes them both separate. Also, Bushin was a GT Base, and the only one starting with the letter B in that system.

So Brave still remains as the only Sparking Ring that starts with the letter B (at least of all the ones that require any Chassis to work). The letter X hasn't been used yet, so I think the spelling of "Xplosion" works.

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Valkyrie is unlikely due to the election thing coming up

I mean that's true, but we can all dream can't we xD

---

Eh, I will think of something to put here...

... later ;)

i mean the Xplosion name sounds great but why you used it is  incorrect we have Brave ring and Bushin ring that only works for gt alone and sparking alone plus this pattern has already been broken with the soon to come hyperion burn and helios volcano

One thing to keep in mind with Hyperion Burn is that the Burn Ring/Base isn't compatible with a Chassis, whilst Brave is compatible with Chassis so it makes them both separate. Also, Bushin was a GT Base, and the only one starting with the letter B in that system.

So Brave still remains as the only Sparking Ring that starts with the letter B (at least of all the ones that require any Chassis to work). The letter X hasn't been used yet, so I think the spelling of "Xplosion" works.

Valkyrie is unlikely due to the election thing coming up

I mean that's true, but we can all dream can't we xD

I thought you were Speculating as it was pretty realistic

i mean the Xplosion name sounds great but why you used it is  incorrect we have Brave ring and Bushin ring that only works for gt alone and sparking alone plus this pattern has already been broken with the soon to come hyperion burn and helios volcano

One thing to keep in mind with Hyperion Burn is that the Burn Ring/Base isn't compatible with a Chassis, whilst Brave is compatible with Chassis so it makes them both separate. Also, Bushin was a GT Base, and the only one starting with the letter B in that system.

So Brave still remains as the only Sparking Ring that starts with the letter B (at least of all the ones that require any Chassis to work). The letter X hasn't been used yet, so I think the spelling of "Xplosion" works.
   
you said (erase base already exists) which by that logic the brave super ring should be named something else 

Valkyrie is unlikely due to the election thing coming up

I mean that's true, but we can all dream can't we xD

---

consequences

---

One thing to keep in mind with Hyperion Burn is that the Burn Ring/Base isn't compatible with a Chassis, whilst Brave is compatible with Chassis so it makes them both separate. Also, Bushin was a GT Base, and the only one starting with the letter B in that system.

So Brave still remains as the only Sparking Ring that starts with the letter B (at least of all the ones that require any Chassis to work). The letter X hasn't been used yet, so I think the spelling of "Xplosion" works.

you said (erase base already exists) which by that logic the brave super ring should be named something else

I've already answered this, but I'll explain myself in more detail (it's a really long explanation, but please hear me out).

Spoiler (Click to View)

Yes, the Erase Ring from Erase Diabolos already exists which is why I spelt my made up Sparking Xcalibur as "Xplosion Xcalibur" instead of "Explosion Xcalibur" (since the letter E is already used.

However, no, Brave should not be named something else. You said that because Hyperion Burn also has the letter B in it's Ring (just like Brave), the name abbreviation system has been "broken" but it really hasn't, because Hyperion Burn's Ring/Base is not compatible with the Chassis and needs a Disc for it to work. The Brave Ring needs a Chassis for it to work (though it can use a Disc too, it still needs a Chassis) so both Burn and Brave can exist separately without messing up the naming system.

Also, because Hyperion Burn is named backwards (like Spriggan Requiem), it's likely going to be abbreviated backwards so it would be HyB (which is Hyperion Burn) instead of BHy (which would be Brave Hyperion instead).

So let's say we make a theoretical combo where we replace Brave Valkyrie's Ring/Base with the Burn Ring/Base (from Hyperion Burn) instead. The Burn Ring/Base needs a Disc for it to work, as it cannot use a Chassis so let's give it the Cho Disc (from Hyperion Burn).
Brave Valkyrie .Ev' 2A's = BVl .Ev' 2A.
Valkyrie Burn Cho.Ev' = VlB超.Ev'

The Burn Ring would likely be abbreviated after the Chip motif, whilst the Brave Ring is abbreviated before the Chip motif which is why they can be differentiated (aside from the reasons I've listed above). If another E Ring/Base was done in the same way as Hyperion's Burn Ring/Base then it could work without clashing with the Erase Base/Ring, but if another E Ring is another regular Ring/Base that fits with a Chassis (lke Erase can), then no it can't work.

tl;dr - The reason the Brave Ring and the Burn Ring doesn't clash the naming system is because the way they're abbreviated would be different and because they're both different working Rings from each other. My made up "Xplosion" Ring is a Ring that fits with a Chassis (like Erase), so I would have to use a different letter for abbreviation.

EDIT - Actually, you're right! I just realised that Erase was the base from Gachi and not Sparking. Sorry about that, I actually forgot that Sparking hasn't made a Ring with the letter E yet.

---

Eh, I will think of something to put here...

... later ;)

you said (erase base already exists) which by that logic the brave super ring should be named something else

I've already answered this, but I'll explain myself in more detail (it's a really long explanation, but please hear me out).

Spoiler (Click to View)

Yes, the Erase Ring from Erase Diabolos already exists which is why I spelt my made up Sparking Xcalibur as "Xplosion Xcalibur" instead of "Explosion Xcalibur" (since the letter E is already used.

However, no, Brave should not be named something else. You said that because Hyperion Burn also has the letter B in it's Ring (just like Brave), the name abbreviation system has been "broken" but it really hasn't, because Hyperion Burn's Ring/Base is not compatible with the Chassis and needs a Disc for it to work. The Brave Ring needs a Chassis for it to work (though it can use a Disc too, it still needs a Chassis) so both Burn and Brave can exist separately without messing up the naming system.

Also, because Hyperion Burn is named backwards (like Spriggan Requiem), it's likely going to be abbreviated backwards so it would be HyB (which is Hyperion Burn) instead of BHy (which would be Brave Hyperion instead).

So let's say we make a theoretical combo where we replace Brave Valkyrie's Ring/Base with the Burn Ring/Base (from Hyperion Burn) instead. The Burn Ring/Base needs a Disc for it to work, as it cannot use a Chassis so let's give it the Cho Disc (from Hyperion Burn).
Brave Valkyrie .Ev' 2A's = BVl .Ev' 2A.
Valkyrie Burn Cho.Ev' = VlB超.Ev'

The Burn Ring would likely be abbreviated after the Chip motif, whilst the Brave Ring is abbreviated before the Chip motif which is why they can be differentiated (aside from the reasons I've listed above). If another E Ring/Base was done in the same way as Hyperion's Burn Ring/Base then it could work without clashing with the Erase Base/Ring, but if another E Ring is another regular Ring/Base that fits with a Chassis (lke Erase can), then no it can't work.

tl;dr - The reason the Brave Ring and the Burn Ring doesn't clash the naming system is because the way they're abbreviated would be different and because they're both different working Rings from each other. My made up "Xplosion" Ring is a Ring that fits with a Chassis (like Erase), so I would have to use a different letter for abbreviation.

I think you’re mistaking Erase for Abyss, because Erase uses layer weights, not Chassis.

---

Hey there! My name is BuilderROB and I am an organizer who hosts tournaments in North Carolina.

Spoiler (Click to View)

Spoiler (Click to View)

I've already answered this, but I'll explain myself in more detail (it's a really long explanation, but please hear me out).

Spoiler (Click to View)

Yes, the Erase Ring from Erase Diabolos already exists which is why I spelt my made up Sparking Xcalibur as "Xplosion Xcalibur" instead of "Explosion Xcalibur" (since the letter E is already used.

However, no, Brave should not be named something else. You said that because Hyperion Burn also has the letter B in it's Ring (just like Brave), the name abbreviation system has been "broken" but it really hasn't, because Hyperion Burn's Ring/Base is not compatible with the Chassis and needs a Disc for it to work. The Brave Ring needs a Chassis for it to work (though it can use a Disc too, it still needs a Chassis) so both Burn and Brave can exist separately without messing up the naming system.

Also, because Hyperion Burn is named backwards (like Spriggan Requiem), it's likely going to be abbreviated backwards so it would be HyB (which is Hyperion Burn) instead of BHy (which would be Brave Hyperion instead).

So let's say we make a theoretical combo where we replace Brave Valkyrie's Ring/Base with the Burn Ring/Base (from Hyperion Burn) instead. The Burn Ring/Base needs a Disc for it to work, as it cannot use a Chassis so let's give it the Cho Disc (from Hyperion Burn).
Brave Valkyrie .Ev' 2A's = BVl .Ev' 2A.
Valkyrie Burn Cho.Ev' = VlB超.Ev'

The Burn Ring would likely be abbreviated after the Chip motif, whilst the Brave Ring is abbreviated before the Chip motif which is why they can be differentiated (aside from the reasons I've listed above). If another E Ring/Base was done in the same way as Hyperion's Burn Ring/Base then it could work without clashing with the Erase Base/Ring, but if another E Ring is another regular Ring/Base that fits with a Chassis (lke Erase can), then no it can't work.

tl;dr - The reason the Brave Ring and the Burn Ring doesn't clash the naming system is because the way they're abbreviated would be different and because they're both different working Rings from each other. My made up "Xplosion" Ring is a Ring that fits with a Chassis (like Erase), so I would have to use a different letter for abbreviation.

I think you’re mistaking Erase for Abyss, because Erase uses layer weights, not Chassis.

Oh carp! You're right! I did, didn't I haha! My apologies then, that was a huge mistake on my part.

But I'm still gonna use the spelling "Xplosion" because it sounds cooler.

---

Eh, I will think of something to put here...

... later ;)

I wish when they release dragoon galaxy, he comes with a new electric driver

---

Hypothetical Names for new Superking beys

Twister Wyvern Hurricane Atomic Metal 1D
Scythe Deathscyther J' 1A
Zone Xcalibur 1'D Ir' 1D (they did this with Diabolos by giving it Single Chassis)
Reform Genesis Hy 1D

I think infinity Genesis is a better name, but then, we have infinite Achilles

---

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Sorry to tell you this late but if you want to follow the TT rule Nova is taken by Nova Neptune

---

B-177 January Booster "Old Rival" Prediction and Wishful stuff

Wyvren 

Spoiler (Click to View)

This is pretty self explanatory Wakiya was the oldest Rival character (defense) as a legend 

Gale Wyvern. Hr. Atomic Metal 1D

Gale, is a right spin ring that have a double free-spinning ring on it to make it different from Helios volcano design wise i want this to look like tW but less Bright green And this thing makes 2D free spin

Atomic Metal, bc January booster after god tend to use a ball tip as the driver 

 
Phoenix 

Spoiler (Click to View)

Purgatory Phoenix. Wh. Mb 1D

Honestly idk what part to pick on this bey But at least the name is cool lol

Purgatory, is like rP and dP where it has the Phoenix armor gimmick on it

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Sorry to tell you this late but if you want to follow the TT rule Nova is taken by Nova Neptune

---

B-177 January Booster "Old Rival" Prediction and Wishful stuff

Wyvren 

Spoiler (Click to View)

This is pretty self explanatory Wakiya was the oldest Rival character (defense) as a legend 

Gale Wyvern. Hr. Atomic Metal 1D

Gale, is a right spin ring that have a double free-spinning ring on it to make it different from Helios volcano design wise i want this to look like tW but less Bright green And this thing makes 2D free spin

Atomic Metal, bc January booster after god tend to use a ball tip as the driver 

 
Phoenix 

Spoiler (Click to View)

Purgatory Phoenix. Wh. Mb 1D

Honestly idk what part to pick on this bey But at least the name is cool lol

Purgatory, is like rP and dP where it has the Phoenix armor gimmick on it

What about ken, he is the oldest defense rival

---

Sorry to tell you this late but if you want to follow the TT rule Nova is taken by Nova Neptune

---

B-177 January Booster "Old Rival" Prediction and Wishful stuff

Wyvren 

Spoiler (Click to View)

This is pretty self explanatory Wakiya was the oldest Rival character (defense) as a legend 

Gale Wyvern. Hr. Atomic Metal 1D

Gale, is a right spin ring that have a double free-spinning ring on it to make it different from Helios volcano design wise i want this to look like tW but less Bright green And this thing makes 2D free spin

Atomic Metal, bc January booster after god tend to use a ball tip as the driver 

 
Phoenix 

Spoiler (Click to View)

Purgatory Phoenix. Wh. Mb 1D

Honestly idk what part to pick on this bey But at least the name is cool lol

Purgatory, is like rP and dP where it has the Phoenix armor gimmick on it

What about ken, he is the oldest defense rival

That B-177 product is going to be a legend's bey, as I think it was titled 'legend defense'.

---

Brave Valkyrie is my favorite bey, and Valt is my favorite character even if he's a bit overrated.

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

Sorry to tell you this late but if you want to follow the TT rule Nova is taken by Nova Neptune

---

Ah shoots! You're right! That's another big L moment for me, haha! Today really hasn't been my day.

I'll rename it Neo Valkyrie instead.

---

Eh, I will think of something to put here...

... later ;)

What about Justice Xcalibur. Is it just me that thinks it sounds EPIC.

---

I'm gonna Ragnawreck ya

What about Justice Xcalibur.  Is it just me that thinks it sounds EPIC.

Yeah that sounds amazing dude.

---

Not bad eh?

Definitely a Achilles with a electric driver!

What about Justice Xcalibur. Is it just me that thinks it sounds EPIC.

At first I was like, "bruh, you gotta be joking".
Two seconds later: Now I understand and agree.

---

Definitely a Achilles with a electric driver!

It would be cool, yes, but not really sure how that'd fit Achilles. Maybe if it were an entire season gimmick that would be awesome.
Not really sure how an electric driver fit Dragon either.

---

Brave Valkyrie is my favorite bey, and Valt is my favorite character even if he's a bit overrated.

I want a new Phoenix so badly

---

This sounds like fun, I'll give my two predictions of what parts or gimmicks I could see or want to see for the future Random Booster Vol.23.

The Possible Sparking Xcalibur (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Let's suppose Random Booster Vol.23's random booster turns out to be a Sparking Xcalibur, then the combo name would be Xplosion Xcalibur .Ir 4A (4A is a hypothetical new Chassis). I'm keeping in mind that some letters for the Rings cannot be used twice for abbreviation, which is why I spelt the Layer Ring as "Xplosion" instead of "Explosion" (the Erase Base already exists) since the letter X has yet to be used.

I hope they give it a new Chassis where it works similar to the bK Layer, where part of it is connected with the prongs on the Chassis. By losing half the locks of the bey, it unlocks triggers parts and goes outwards with centrifugal force for more weight focused on where the sword lines up (on the hypothetical Ring of the possible Xcalibur).

If not that, then they could do a bK gimmick but on the Xplosion Ring, except obviously it extends a sword outwards more instead.

The Possible Sparking Deathscyther (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

The name/combo for this hypothetical Sparking Deathscyther would be Penalize/Punisher Deathscyther HJ' 1A. The letter P has surprisingly not been used for the abbreviation for the Layer Rings yet as far as I know, so I think it should be okay.

The gimmick of the Penalize/Punisher Ring would most likely just be an upgraded version of Double Strike, but heavier and using the metal ball system that the Flare Base from GT had, but for Attack Types instead.

However, another gimmick idea could be that the Penalize/Punisher Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, where each lock pushes the Double Strike scythe closer to the main scythe, until the Double Strike scythe is completely locked onto the main scythe, creating more impact and weight focused on the scythe but loses the Double Strike gimmick (until you reassemble it).

If I could have a new Driver, I would love to see them make a Jm Driver (Jaggy Metal), but that would never happen, much like the possibility of this evolution.

The Possible Sparking Valkyrie Evolution (Predictions/Ideas)

Spoiler (Click to View)

Call me crazy, but I can see an evolution for Valkyrie being possible too. It might not happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a chance at all.

My idea is that the new Valkyrie would be called Nova Valkyrie Gg' 2A. The gimmick of the Nova Ring has a "sub-layer" (akin to Arc Bahamut) that locks onto the Chassis prongs, I know, I used this a lot for my ideas huh. Anyways, the gimmick is that it starts off as a regular spring-based "bound layer" but when it loses more and more locks, it locks the spring mechanism within the Ring, making the blades more solid and no longer using a bound gimmick (until you relock it, obviously). There's also going to be an addition of rubber on the blades, to make it more interesting.

For the Driver, it's gonna be a new Driver called Giga'. It's a combination of the Ul' Driver and the Ev' Driver where it has the semi-flat to rubber flat gimmick, but can also become more powerful by wearing off the rubber spikes like Variable or Evolution. But here's the catch, because the Ev'-esque rubber spikes on the Driver are tall, it will temporarily perform like a regular unused Ev' Driver and in order to activate the Ul'-esque gimmick, the rubber spikes have to be worn down in order to expose the semi-flat gimmick. Then after the spikes are worn down, it will perform like Ul' but you can now wear down the last set of rubber spikes on the Driver so it can become faster (when the semi-flat tip retracts, of course).

And yeah, the Chassis is the same as Brave Valkyrie's, but I'd imagine they would've probably kept it as it is to save a bit of costs of creating an entirely new Chassis. Plus, it's a Random Booster, so not every part can be new.

I like your idea

---