MFB Tiers list Last Updated 27/12/11

Poll: Should this be stickied?

Yes
58.61%
245
No
9.81%
41
Needs more work before it's stickied
31.58%
132
Total: 100% 418 vote(s)
It can but SF and FS and others are better.
Personally, I believe that Hell should be on Tier 2 for Defense, not just Stamina.

Whether it should be used with BD145 in Boost mode, is debatable.
Test Screw+Pisces/Horogium. I think it should be like this:
Tier 2 attack:
Metal wheels: Screw (Only when used with Pisces/Horogium)
Clear wheels: Horogium, Pisces
But it depends on how your tests go.
Well... just someone with the right parts please do it.
(Apr. 22, 2011  7:57 PM)ldragolightning Wrote: Test Screw+Pisces/Horogium. I think it should be like this:
Tier 2 attack:
Metal wheels: Screw (Only when used with Pisces/Horogium)
Clear wheels: Horogium, Pisces
But it depends on how your tests go.
Well... just someone with the right parts please do it.
Ill do it in a second and done
Screw Horigium VS Basalt Aquario BD145 WB
BA:9 wins(By 3KOs ands 6OS)
SH:1 win(KO)
Light launcher 2 used for tests with launcher Grip
oh.. whoops this doesn't belong here..
The Combo is Screw Horgium 90 RF and remember that Right Spin Attack Doesen't do too good agaisnt Modern Defense.(It's just slighly worse than Vulcan.)
Heh. If you're against a newer defense combo, a metal face can help. But yeah, it generally won't work against bd145, maybe if it's in boost mode, but yeah. Launch as hard as you can, etc etc. Doing comparative results with vulcan and maybe pegasis might be a fairer way to test it. It's not going to break basalt bd145, though.

And yeah, I know I did testing to show a metal face was unnecessary, however, as the defence combo's have become heavier, it requires more weight to prevent suffering bad recoil. It made a pretty obvious diffetence when I was playing around anyway. And hey, as much as that's only on wb, 10% isn't actually too bad against basalt bd145. Tongue_out
I'm down for XF finally being in tier one. Or at least top of tier 2*.

*I won't accept this alternative.
Yes I can accept this now cause someone finally did some testing and proved it. Also seems to be the best bottom to use against Basalt Bull/Kerbecs/Aquario BD145CS/MB.
LRF also need to be Tier 1. The spin stealing capabilites, massive attacking force, and advantage for left spin beyblades that it provides is more than enough to be top-tier.
LRF is in tier 1 Tongue_out
and where do MF (bottom) and MB stand on this list ?
MF should bes tier 2 for Attack.
MB should be Tier 1 For Defense.(When Paired with Basalt and BD145) and 1 for Stamina.
(Apr. 24, 2011  8:30 AM)Ultrablader Wrote: Yes I can accept this now cause someone finally did some testing and proved it. Also seems to be the best bottom to use against Basalt Bull/Kerbecs/Aquario BD145CS/MB.

MF-F Lightning LDrago was around the first time I told you to put XF as tier 1, so testing was done. Anyway, good to see LRF and XF at the top. I don't really agree with CS being in tier 1, I have a rather aggressive one but it is not worthy of tier 1 to me, really.
Should add Burn mold 4 as tier 1, I heard it performs on par or better than 2. I can test this if necessary. And should also note that the Dark in defense is the Hasbro mold, since the TT one has nothing that it's good at.
(Apr. 24, 2011  6:13 PM)GaHooleone Wrote: Should add Burn mold 4 as tier 1, I heard it performs on par or better than 2. I can test this if necessary. And should also note that the Dark in defense is the Hasbro mold, since the TT one has nothing that it's good at.

There's a 4th mold? Unless you count the Hasbro mold as Mold 3.
(Apr. 24, 2011  6:48 PM)Mr. N Wrote:
(Apr. 24, 2011  6:13 PM)GaHooleone Wrote: Should add Burn mold 4 as tier 1, I heard it performs on par or better than 2. I can test this if necessary. And should also note that the Dark in defense is the Hasbro mold, since the TT one has nothing that it's good at.

There's a 4th mold? Unless you count the Hasbro mold as Mold 3.

mold 1
mold 2
hasbro mold
super deck set mold

thats what i've been told
(Apr. 24, 2011  8:57 PM)SSJfisherman Wrote: mold 1
mold 2
hasbro mold
super deck set mold

thats what i've been told
[Image: dr-seuss.jpg]
LOL I had to. Where did that information come from though?
(Apr. 24, 2011  9:34 PM)Dan Wrote:
(Apr. 24, 2011  8:57 PM)SSJfisherman Wrote: mold 1
mold 2
hasbro mold
super deck set mold

thats what i've been told
[Image: dr-seuss.jpg]
LOL I had to. Where did that information come from though?

i'm pretty sure McFrown told me through PM's.
he's always said it was a different mold, but i never actually noticed a difference, ahah
(Dec. 20, 2010  11:08 PM)Ultrablader Wrote: This list it to have a record of the performance of parts in the different types showing how all the parts compare with each other. Here's a link to the testing thread:
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-MFB-Tier...ing-thread

Destabilizers (Click to View)

Tell me what you guys think. Also suggest your own bits and i'll add them.

Here's a list of parts which need more testing:

MF
MB
Screw
PD
Mercury
LRF
DS

awesome destabiliser
Flame Capricorn D125 DS
it beats basalt if it doesn't get knocked out
DS is very good for destabilising
and shouldn't you have Equalizing
you need tests to back up your info Confused
Ds needs further testing really flam is already known and D125 is a taller than the average destabliser
Ds needs further testing really flam is already known and D125 is a taller than the average destabliser
try it your self for proof this is my test but it is with balance stadium Unhappy
Flame Capricorn D125 vs Basalt Bull AD145 WD
i tested this in a tt attack stadium
Flame Capricorne D125DS VS Basalt Bull AD145WD

basalt bull wins 12 ( 5 ko , 7 os )
flame capricorne wins 3 ( 1 ko , 2 os)

DS does this weird lean down thing when it is off balance and basalt smashes it around when this happons
it is to tall to destabilzer