(Jun. 21, 2022 7:03 AM)p0l1w4g06 Wrote: While I'd argue, considering my previous attempts, its better for the sake of the thread I don't, as I'd lose anyway, and cause unwanted thread hogging.
Maybe we could at least use him as a secondary opinion? Like sure he's overly positive, but could serve as a neuter to our mostly negative attitude, right? (Also he also thinks Gravity Rings are garbage like the rest of us, so are we really that different?)
Being a contrarian for the sake of being contrarian isn't helpful.
When opinions are only backed up by positivity, and not testing data, how useful is the opinion in a competitive setting? That particular user was never concerned about competitive anyway, they've stated before they want to "have fun, not be competitive". So why use them to back up competitive facts?
You are misplacing fault. The fault lies with Hasbro releasing a bad product, not this thread being negative about it.
If a part is bad, that's objectively what it is - the "negative" opinion is because of the objectivity of the PRODUCT not the subjectivity of the CONSUMERS.
This is like eating burnt food at a restaurant and telling the person eating to be positive, instead of calling out the chef for burning the food.
Being positive for the sake of being positive misleads consumers and only helps Hasbro.
Currently fan translating the Beyblade X manga. Beyblade Wiki Administrator and occasional manga scanlator.