(Nov. 29, 2011 3:32 PM)Xyo Wrote:(Nov. 29, 2011 2:41 PM)BeybladerPotter Wrote: [Image: di-297G.png]What Render and did you follow a tut?
CnC?
I forgot where I got the render but I did not follow a tut. ^^
(Nov. 29, 2011 3:32 PM)Xyo Wrote:(Nov. 29, 2011 2:41 PM)BeybladerPotter Wrote: [Image: di-297G.png]What Render and did you follow a tut?
CnC?
(Nov. 29, 2011 3:17 PM)Whatzzer Wrote:So I followed taj12's advice and made these.Any better?Spoiler (Click to View)
(Nov. 29, 2011 4:16 PM)Whatzzer Wrote: I can email it.My country banned megaupload,rapidshare.nevermind my parents dont allow it ill just get the pic
(Nov. 29, 2011 5:12 PM)BeybladerPotter Wrote:Which Tut?(Nov. 29, 2011 3:32 PM)Xyo Wrote:(Nov. 29, 2011 2:41 PM)BeybladerPotter Wrote: [Image: di-297G.png]What Render and did you follow a tut?
CnC?
I forgot where I got the render but I did not follow a tut. ^^
(Nov. 30, 2011 3:37 AM)Gripsocks Wrote: She said "I did not follow a tut"
(Nov. 29, 2011 10:14 PM)Taj12 Wrote:I guess I overused the Lighting Effects,no?Gee,is the outer glow on the other sig makes it better?(Nov. 29, 2011 3:17 PM)Whatzzer Wrote:So I followed taj12's advice and made these.Any better?Spoiler (Click to View)
The second one looks heaps better.
Sig request for somebody. CnC please.
[Image: di-4SR8.png]
Whatzzer: This sig was made using exactly the same stuff i told you earlier, and pretty much all my sigs. And i don't have an email anymore
(Nov. 30, 2011 11:44 PM)Xyo Wrote: Stock? it is to monotonous and the sides are very dark the text is very unappealing and large there is no depth nor flow and lighting in this piece and it is very LQ try using gimp rather than picnik because with picnic you don't really do anything because the effects are ready made
(Dec. 01, 2011 11:21 PM)CRUelty Wrote: [Image: di-TSC3.png]
Feedback would be appreciated, please