(Mar. 26, 2012 6:40 PM)Universe² Wrote: Ok, I know this question will have biased answers, but I'll ask it anyways
Which generation do you suggest I get back into, Plastic or HMS? Please give reasoning for your answer. I'm leaning towards Plastics because they're cheaper.
Plastics, HMS will murder your wallet unless you have a fair amount of expendable income.
(Mar. 27, 2012 12:10 AM)Shabalabadoo Wrote:(Mar. 25, 2012 8:05 AM)Shabalabadoo Wrote: I've never really understood why there's a term for "Upper Smash". Where's "Sideways Smash"? Sideways Smash sounds dumb but it's the exact same idea, but with a different vector direction.
I understand that it's to help people understand what they're seeing and help them differentiate from Upper Attack, but Smash Attack in an upward direction is just what it is, nothing requiring extra definitions, haha.
I'm going to quote my own post because I forgot to respond to what several guys responded with a couple pages back. Just so I don't have to quote several quotes!
I completely agree th!nk. However, I just don't feel another vocab word is necessary. Although I do support and understand Hazel's original response, I just feel now it should just be referred to as Smash Attack, towards the sky, haha.
Although, you guys have been pretty good with not making it a term, being that nobody suggested that it goes on BeyWiki and that you guys explain it very well. I guess it's the capitals and use of "Upper" and not "upwards" as it had originally been, as Dan pointed out, that had made me feel like a new term was starting to start, even though it was originally just referred to as "upwards Smash", with Smash captialized only, and the way I personally think it should be.
Hahaha, wow that last sentence jumbled my brain!
We have Force Smash, and people get confused. There's no argument anyway, it's already in the vocab