With the influx of new releases, I think it's important to distinguish whether the disk and the frames align with the major points of contact on the layer.
For the disks, the "cis" (Z) notation would mean the configuration the closest to the largest point of contact (e.g. Xcalibur's sword-shaped protrusion), while the "trans" (E) notation would mean the opposite. The configuration closest to the largest point of contact would mean the configuration possible to reach (e.g. Magnum's "cis" configuration on Xeno Xcalibur would be the one aligning with the blade rather than the hilt of the sword after two clicks, while Triple on Valkyrie would have a "cis" configuration after two clicks as the large wings align with the disk instead of the smaller wings (which is the "trans" configuration")
For the frames, [ would represent a left rotation while ] would represent a right rotation configuration. Both disks and frames can have the "cis" and "trans" configurations as well.
These notations can be potentially useful for bladers who wish to study the physics behind the tests in depth as the weight distribution is normalized, and those who wish to replicate the tests on their own. Please let me know what do you think of this.
For the disks, the "cis" (Z) notation would mean the configuration the closest to the largest point of contact (e.g. Xcalibur's sword-shaped protrusion), while the "trans" (E) notation would mean the opposite. The configuration closest to the largest point of contact would mean the configuration possible to reach (e.g. Magnum's "cis" configuration on Xeno Xcalibur would be the one aligning with the blade rather than the hilt of the sword after two clicks, while Triple on Valkyrie would have a "cis" configuration after two clicks as the large wings align with the disk instead of the smaller wings (which is the "trans" configuration")
For the frames, [ would represent a left rotation while ] would represent a right rotation configuration. Both disks and frames can have the "cis" and "trans" configurations as well.
These notations can be potentially useful for bladers who wish to study the physics behind the tests in depth as the weight distribution is normalized, and those who wish to replicate the tests on their own. Please let me know what do you think of this.