(Apr. 12, 2022 2:16 AM)Broyeeto Wrote:In P3C1 you can pick/mind game your opponent into a highly undesirable and nearly unwinnable match up, just like you could with single bey. I mean, you do ultimately still play with one bey each. Sometimes when you achieve this, very little skill is actually needed for spinning of the tops themselves. The launching of the tops become mostly a formality, and this isn’t deck match type so it’s just gg after you launch the appropriate # of times. This is still certainly possible even in MFL. You can pick your opponent to death in 3on3 too, but it’s just harder to out pick perfectly that many times imo.(Apr. 12, 2022 1:33 AM)DeceasedCrab Wrote: I don't follow that logic at all. I do remember you trying to change the tournament to P3C1 before we started, but it was advertised as a 3v3 tournament and I was insistent it remain so. As we all know, I really don't like the P3C1 format or find it fun or interesting, so I'm not sure what problem with 3v3 that P3C1 solves. Does 3v3 take a little longer? Sure. But it's more fun to me.
Personally the reason I like P3C1 is because it makes it more knowledge and skill than what the more luck based 3v3 is. In P3C1 I am able to look at the opponents options and see what my best option to counter the most would be. It creates a very deep mindgame on what combo to use. I would probably like 3V3 a little better than I do now (not better than P3C1) if you were able to look at the opponents deck before making your first order.
I guess to use poker terms, you can have your opponent close to drawing dead in P3C1 right at the beginning. Imo, it can get to the point of pocket Aces against Pocket Kings odds. This hands can happen in Hold’em sure, but that is why you play more than one hand right? I guess it is picking skills to straight dominate your opponent with ur pick. But idk that it is fun or exciting to play once someone is dominated. After all, P3C1 is just the first step of deck match type played to 3 points. I mean… isn’t there a reason deck match type isn’t just that?