When i tried the soft brush for smudging it looked wierd

(Aug. 19, 2011 3:49 AM)Xyo Wrote: ok i used a hard brush and full strength XD and what could i do for the light source than setting it to overlay?(i did not want the text but XwailingX wants the text thanks again for the tips
(Aug. 17, 2011 12:59 AM)Flaming Aries Wrote: A quick sig I made compliments?
[Image: CRESNIC.png]
(Aug. 18, 2011 8:41 PM)Vintage Wrote: Hmm...haven't done one in a while, but here:
[Image: depth.png]
(Aug. 17, 2011 8:46 AM)Xyo Wrote: What do you guys theink?
[Image: di-T89S.png]
i made it for XwailingX
(Aug. 20, 2011 2:00 AM)Fyuuor Wrote:(Aug. 18, 2011 8:41 PM)Vintage Wrote: Hmm...haven't done one in a while, but here:
[Image: depth.png]
Vintage, I normally enjoy your work and believe that you’re a fantastic GFX artist, but unfortunately I’m sorry to say what you were trying in this sig I’m just not feeling. It’s great to see that you’re trying something new and willing to break out of your conventional mould, but unfortunately I’m not sure if this is the right direction. The sig is far too blurry for my taste, whilst also being confusing and disorientating to look at. I honestly would have enjoyed the sig more if there wasn’t such a strong blur across the surface of the sig.
Though I must say I like the effect you have created in the background behind the character, it seems as though you’ve placed a multi coloured gradient on several brush strokes. Nice work
(Aug. 20, 2011 12:50 AM)Flaming Aries Wrote: OK LYNX SIG!
[Image: BeatLynx.png]
(Aug. 20, 2011 2:13 AM)Vintage Wrote: Hmm...I see, I guess making a signature from scratch is a lot tougher than I thought. What I was trying to do was create a signature without using brushes, stocks, and renders, while still getting the same outcome. Though, it was a lot tougher than I previously imagined.