Please check out my thread, comment, and all tests are appreciated. Especially EWD tests.
Concept (Click to View)
tests (Click to View)
It is Top Tier |
|
0 |
It is Viable |
|
2 |
It is okay |
|
6 |
It is not good |
|
2 |
It just totally sucks ;( |
|
2 |
Total: | 100% | 12 vote(s) |
(Nov. 11, 2013 1:11 AM)Tri Wrote: You did less than 20 rounds. You had 7, 5, and 10 ...
Is this supposed to be a counter to Dragoon spin steal? Duo would be a much better choice for this combo. There's no way this got 100% against Wyvang Dragoon unless you launched the attack type incorrectly. EWD would be better because EDS wears quickly and it doesn't stay upright as long as EWD :\.
(Nov. 11, 2013 1:19 AM)AZL Wrote:(Nov. 11, 2013 1:11 AM)Tri Wrote: You did less than 20 rounds. You had 7, 5, and 10 ...
Is this supposed to be a counter to Dragoon spin steal? Duo would be a much better choice for this combo. There's no way this got 100% against Wyvang Dragoon unless you launched the attack type incorrectly. EWD would be better because EDS wears quickly and it doesn't stay upright as long as EWD :\.
I didn't have time but I will do more later.
I forgot to post my defense results. I will post them in the OP.
oh, and my LRF is messed up.
(Nov. 11, 2013 1:28 AM)DRAGON KING Wrote:So I redid them with RF.(Nov. 11, 2013 1:19 AM)AZL Wrote:(Nov. 11, 2013 1:11 AM)Tri Wrote: You did less than 20 rounds. You had 7, 5, and 10 ...
Is this supposed to be a counter to Dragoon spin steal? Duo would be a much better choice for this combo. There's no way this got 100% against Wyvang Dragoon unless you launched the attack type incorrectly. EWD would be better because EDS wears quickly and it doesn't stay upright as long as EWD :\.
I didn't have time but I will do more later.
I forgot to post my defense results. I will post them in the OP.
oh, and my LRF is messed up.
Then u shouldn't post tests with it
(Nov. 11, 2013 6:53 PM)theblackdragon Wrote: Er... there's really no point in using Genbull Killerken. :\ Genbull performs awesome on the top of a synchrome, but sticking it on the bottom is gonna mess up the shape and endurance a bit. Aside from that, Genbull doesn't really perform too well on D-series bottoms, so you're probably much better off using Duo SA165EWD instead.
However, Killerken Genbull SA165TB is an absolute MONSTER... I use it a lot. Genbull SA165TB needs to be looked into more in BB-10 format. It definitely has potential.
(Nov. 11, 2013 7:04 PM)AZL Wrote:(Nov. 11, 2013 6:53 PM)theblackdragon Wrote: Er... there's really no point in using Genbull Killerken. :\ Genbull performs awesome on the top of a synchrome, but sticking it on the bottom is gonna mess up the shape and endurance a bit. Aside from that, Genbull doesn't really perform too well on D-series bottoms, so you're probably much better off using Duo SA165EWD instead.
However, Killerken Genbull SA165TB is an absolute MONSTER... I use it a lot. Genbull SA165TB needs to be looked into more in BB-10 format. It definitely has potential.
What can it defeat?
(Nov. 12, 2013 1:31 PM)DrPepsidew Wrote:If you want, you don't need to though.(Nov. 11, 2013 7:04 PM)AZL Wrote:(Nov. 11, 2013 6:53 PM)theblackdragon Wrote: Er... there's really no point in using Genbull Killerken. :\ Genbull performs awesome on the top of a synchrome, but sticking it on the bottom is gonna mess up the shape and endurance a bit. Aside from that, Genbull doesn't really perform too well on D-series bottoms, so you're probably much better off using Duo SA165EWD instead.
However, Killerken Genbull SA165TB is an absolute MONSTER... I use it a lot. Genbull SA165TB needs to be looked into more in BB-10 format. It definitely has potential.
What can it defeat?
Would you really like me to do tests?