I haven't practiced in PS for ages, but this is what I came up with. I think it's alright, but I want to get better.
[Image: falcosigtk8.jpg]
[Image: falcosigtk8.jpg]
Falco Sig
Why Falco?
sam Wrote:Why Falco?
... Erm ... what?
Because I liked the render. That's why.
looks awesome
personally, id do it with no text. while small, i feel its looks kinda weird.
sweet render and BG
personally, id do it with no text. while small, i feel its looks kinda weird.
sweet render and BG
Alice Wrote:I just don't like him.sam Wrote:Why Falco?
... Erm ... what?
Because I liked the render. That's why.
Fox was wayyy better dood.
First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.
![[Image: 13a26e5a.jpg]](https://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x67/featheredoroborus/13a26e5a.jpg)
Composer of Requiems Wrote:First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.it's not brush, it's smudge (I'm pretty sure it is)
nice job btw, but I don't like the text
Silver Kane Wrote:Composer of Requiems Wrote:First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.it's not brush, it's smudge (I'm pretty sure it is)
nice job btw, but I don't like the text
Yeah, it's a smudge.
I was practicing with it.
I'm talking about to the left.
[Image: Untitled-42.jpg]
I believe that is one of the defaults or similar,
[Image: Untitled-25.jpg]
This part is what impresses me. Carries out the concept and structure well, and is very rarely used. Brings out the fiery and rough feeling well.
To be honest, I did not notice there even was any trace of smudging on the right initially since it did not stand out noticably.
Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
[Image: Untitled-42.jpg]
I believe that is one of the defaults or similar,
[Image: Untitled-25.jpg]
This part is what impresses me. Carries out the concept and structure well, and is very rarely used. Brings out the fiery and rough feeling well.
To be honest, I did not notice there even was any trace of smudging on the right initially since it did not stand out noticably.
Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
You're right Composer, I did use one of those brushes, but I used it to smudge.
Thanks for the compliments, it means a lot coming from you!
Thanks for the compliments, it means a lot coming from you!
Composer of Requiems Wrote:Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
Huh? Even Alice said I was right about it being smudge
btw I was good with sigs "back in the day" myself actually, I was staff on the biggest forum on invisionfree. I've lost all my skills since I quit though, lol.Oh and it's not "rarely used", people (including me) were making sigs using that method 2005. No offense to Alice though, I still think it's a great sig.
Wow it's really nice! You should also try a Fox one too!
I also love your current set!
I also love your current set!
Silver Kane Wrote:Composer of Requiems Wrote:Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
Huh? Even Alice said I was right about it being smudge
Oh and it's not "rarely used", people (including me) were making sigs using that method 2005. No offense to Alice though, I still think it's a great sig.
You misunderstand. I would never be saying the usage for a simple smudge effect.
Please do take note carefully of what I refer to.