Dec. 04, 2007 6:00 PM
Dec. 04, 2007 6:25 PM
Why Falco?
Dec. 04, 2007 6:36 PM
sam Wrote:Why Falco?
... Erm ... what?
Because I liked the render. That's why.
Dec. 04, 2007 10:53 PM
looks awesome
personally, id do it with no text. while small, i feel its looks kinda weird.
sweet render and BG
personally, id do it with no text. while small, i feel its looks kinda weird.
sweet render and BG
Dec. 05, 2007 5:07 AM
Alice Wrote:I just don't like him.sam Wrote:Why Falco?
... Erm ... what?
Because I liked the render. That's why.
Fox was wayyy better dood.
Dec. 05, 2007 12:51 PM
First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.
Dec. 05, 2007 4:06 PM
Composer of Requiems Wrote:First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.it's not brush, it's smudge (I'm pretty sure it is)
nice job btw, but I don't like the text
Dec. 05, 2007 4:13 PM
Silver Kane Wrote:Composer of Requiems Wrote:First time I've seen someone use this brush effectively.it's not brush, it's smudge (I'm pretty sure it is)
nice job btw, but I don't like the text
Yeah, it's a smudge. I was practicing with it.
Dec. 05, 2007 4:33 PM
I'm talking about to the left.
[Image: Untitled-42.jpg]
I believe that is one of the defaults or similar,
[Image: Untitled-25.jpg]
This part is what impresses me. Carries out the concept and structure well, and is very rarely used. Brings out the fiery and rough feeling well.
To be honest, I did not notice there even was any trace of smudging on the right initially since it did not stand out noticably.
Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
[Image: Untitled-42.jpg]
I believe that is one of the defaults or similar,
[Image: Untitled-25.jpg]
This part is what impresses me. Carries out the concept and structure well, and is very rarely used. Brings out the fiery and rough feeling well.
To be honest, I did not notice there even was any trace of smudging on the right initially since it did not stand out noticably.
Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
Dec. 05, 2007 4:55 PM
You're right Composer, I did use one of those brushes, but I used it to smudge.
Thanks for the compliments, it means a lot coming from you!
Thanks for the compliments, it means a lot coming from you!
Dec. 05, 2007 7:14 PM
Composer of Requiems Wrote:Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
Huh? Even Alice said I was right about it being smudge btw I was good with sigs "back in the day" myself actually, I was staff on the biggest forum on invisionfree. I've lost all my skills since I quit though, lol.
Oh and it's not "rarely used", people (including me) were making sigs using that method 2005. No offense to Alice though, I still think it's a great sig.
Dec. 05, 2007 7:37 PM
Wow it's really nice! You should also try a Fox one too!
I also love your current set!
I also love your current set!
Dec. 06, 2007 2:35 AM
Silver Kane Wrote:Composer of Requiems Wrote:Silver Kane, I feel very insulted by your insinuation about my understanding. Please do not make such assertions.
Huh? Even Alice said I was right about it being smudge btw I was good with sigs "back in the day" myself actually, I was staff on the biggest forum on invisionfree. I've lost all my skills since I quit though, lol.
Oh and it's not "rarely used", people (including me) were making sigs using that method 2005. No offense to Alice though, I still think it's a great sig.
You misunderstand. I would never be saying the usage for a simple smudge effect.
Please do take note carefully of what I refer to.