Not sure if I should post it here, as the article is a stub, but I only know about the face bolt on Duo Uranus. Uranus is the Roman counterpart to the Greek god Ouranous, the sky. The face bolt makes him look evil, as he was. He killed the children he was bored with.
Errors on the wiki ???
![[Image: 29g26q0.gif]](https://i40.tinypic.com/29g26q0.gif)
(Dec. 29, 2011 5:35 AM)JCx06 Wrote: Just Checked the LDG page, isn't the face L Drago III?
LLD-MLD-LDD
so
?
EDIT: Just realized that LDD comes with a pearl blue face, what is the actual name?
(instead of LDIII)
There is no such thing as a L-Drago Guardian article nor L-Drago Destroy.Not even a stub.
![[Image: ares.png]](https://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc487/Haikal_Kushahrin/ares.png)
![[Image: userbrad.gif]](https://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc487/Haikal_Kushahrin/userbrad.gif)
There is a guardian stub
Care to link?Also,if it is Guardian,it should be L-Drago IV,not III.
LLD>MLD(II)>LDD(III)>LDG(IV)
LLD>MLD(II)>LDD(III)>LDG(IV)
The slight border on the Face sticker of Lightning L Drago does not call as a completely separate Face, as far as I know. It is III, not IV. Do not edit stubs like that.
I was just looking around on the wiki and realized that on the Track List UW145 is missing and EWD is missing from the Bottoms List. Also a few Metal Wheels are missing from that list. I just wanted to let you guys know.
![[Image: spin.gif]](https://paulrobertson.mechafetus.com/spin.gif)
(Jan. 02, 2012 12:42 AM)UGottaCetus Wrote: I was just looking around on the wiki and realized that on the Track List UW145 is missing and EWD is missing from the Bottoms List. Also a few Metal Wheels are missing from that list. I just wanted to let you guys know.
That is not an error ... Articles get written by members, so if there is nothing on UW145 and EWD, that means that nobody has written a good enough article for Killer Beafowl yet. Just be patient, or write a good draft yourself.
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...25/WD145RS
Some of the info here seems a bit outdated. What is more, the overall section slightly contradicts the info in the article itself, specificly the usefulnes of T125 and RS. I am not fluent with the current state of the metagame (4D) so i do not feel that I have knowlage to correct it. I am not certain how outclassed RS is now, if it even is at all.
Some of the info here seems a bit outdated. What is more, the overall section slightly contradicts the info in the article itself, specificly the usefulnes of T125 and RS. I am not fluent with the current state of the metagame (4D) so i do not feel that I have knowlage to correct it. I am not certain how outclassed RS is now, if it even is at all.
RS is still quite proficient, actually, but with the prominence of BD145, it obviously isn't everyone's first choice.
![[Image: hazelsignature2.jpg]](https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v223/OrochiStorm/hazelsignature2.jpg)
What about T125? The overall section basicly praised it, which doesnt seem right for an only slightly above average overly common part
I'm not sure if this is an error , but I'm sorry if it is not ...
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...ottom_List
In the bottom list , most beys aren't mentioned
Eg : for SD , Dark Libra etc. Arent mentioned ...
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...ottom_List
In the bottom list , most beys aren't mentioned
Eg : for SD , Dark Libra etc. Arent mentioned ...
![[Image: 28469160550b59am3.jpg]](https://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3969/28469160550b59am3.jpg)
On the RBV7 page, the picture of Gravity Perseus BD145XF is missing.
I fixed this picture's description. http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...Hell12.jpg
I edited the "Hasbro" and "Metal Fight Beyblade" pages to include newer Hasbro stadiums.
I fixed this picture's description. http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...Hell12.jpg
I edited the "Hasbro" and "Metal Fight Beyblade" pages to include newer Hasbro stadiums.
![[Image: shadowsig1.png]](https://imageshack.us/a/img194/8892/shadowsig1.png)
![[Image: 89593399.png]](https://imageshack.us/a/img443/1286/89593399.png)
Just one more thing about plastics.
The Dragoon GT article is, uhh, pretty slim. Now, I'm going to try to not sound disrespectful here (I don't think I've ever spoken to Anu, but I hear only good things), but as someone who has used most of the parts regularly, it really sounds like it was written without any real in-depth testing/experimentation.
For example, the AR section only discusses it's use for upper, (I assume because it is called G Upper), focussing on it's silly, shallow slopes, and completely ignoring the fact it has four well-shaped, well-spaced contact points for smash attack, a wide attack range and fairly well focussed weight, which results in it being a useful smash attack AR. However, the fact it isn't right spin means that it is stuck with rather sluggish bases (Grip base is right spin only, Uriel 2's base/tip etc is too tall for for most AR's), leaving it with the rather disappointing Storm Grip.
Though,
AR: G Upper
WD: Wide Defense (and ONLY Wide Defense).
SG: Left SG OR Neo Left SG (Light Core, or something, it's all plastic?)
BB: Storm Grip
If you can launch it well enough to prevent it just humping the tornado ridge (no I can't explain it better), and hard enough to make it move quickly, it is extremely good, especially for storm grip.
There's also SG Metal Flat II, but I much prefer Cross Griffon there (huge stopping power (needs same spin) plus decent stamina = carnage). G Upper is again let down by spin direction (similar to variares, it cannot really use any spin-steal from being left spin)
However, the AR itself is great, and to be honest, I consider it the best left spin smash attack AR (yes, even over its predecessor Eight-Spiker). It's basically the left spin Cross Griffon.
The CEW isn't great, but it does have some use defensively. The article itself points out that it has grip, and anchors beys. It also has passable stamina (much better than Defense Grip base (seaborg)). Now, I'm not saying it's top tier defensively (it certainly isn't), but it has some use, and I don't think a small, dismissive description of its attack use is really enough.
I'd consider rewriting it some time, seeing as I know a lot about the bey, but a) I've got a few things to write at the moment, I'm trying to get a band off the ground, sort out my job, and a number of other things, and b) no one has actually looked at my Wolborg 2 rewrite yet and it's been months so it is kind of discouraging :c
The Dragoon GT article is, uhh, pretty slim. Now, I'm going to try to not sound disrespectful here (I don't think I've ever spoken to Anu, but I hear only good things), but as someone who has used most of the parts regularly, it really sounds like it was written without any real in-depth testing/experimentation.
For example, the AR section only discusses it's use for upper, (I assume because it is called G Upper), focussing on it's silly, shallow slopes, and completely ignoring the fact it has four well-shaped, well-spaced contact points for smash attack, a wide attack range and fairly well focussed weight, which results in it being a useful smash attack AR. However, the fact it isn't right spin means that it is stuck with rather sluggish bases (Grip base is right spin only, Uriel 2's base/tip etc is too tall for for most AR's), leaving it with the rather disappointing Storm Grip.
Though,
AR: G Upper
WD: Wide Defense (and ONLY Wide Defense).
SG: Left SG OR Neo Left SG (Light Core, or something, it's all plastic?)
BB: Storm Grip
If you can launch it well enough to prevent it just humping the tornado ridge (no I can't explain it better), and hard enough to make it move quickly, it is extremely good, especially for storm grip.
There's also SG Metal Flat II, but I much prefer Cross Griffon there (huge stopping power (needs same spin) plus decent stamina = carnage). G Upper is again let down by spin direction (similar to variares, it cannot really use any spin-steal from being left spin)
However, the AR itself is great, and to be honest, I consider it the best left spin smash attack AR (yes, even over its predecessor Eight-Spiker). It's basically the left spin Cross Griffon.
The CEW isn't great, but it does have some use defensively. The article itself points out that it has grip, and anchors beys. It also has passable stamina (much better than Defense Grip base (seaborg)). Now, I'm not saying it's top tier defensively (it certainly isn't), but it has some use, and I don't think a small, dismissive description of its attack use is really enough.
I'd consider rewriting it some time, seeing as I know a lot about the bey, but a) I've got a few things to write at the moment, I'm trying to get a band off the ground, sort out my job, and a number of other things, and b) no one has actually looked at my Wolborg 2 rewrite yet and it's been months so it is kind of discouraging :c
![[Image: UwZsp7A.png]](https://i.imgur.com/UwZsp7A.png)
I've been wondering about this for a while: The Beywiki has articles about Attack, Defense, Endurance etc containing combos, ARs/WDs/SGs/SPs/BBs and all that. I was wondering if we could add MFB related content too!
I don't see why it didn't happen sooner IMHO.
I don't see why it didn't happen sooner IMHO.
![[Image: uKF94LK.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/uKF94LK.gif)
i noticed one thing regarding Dranzer F..
i have both Hasbro and Takara one...
the Hasbro one is the light blue recolor and i noticed its SG has better lock mechanism than Takara one..
The Hasbro SG works just like D : D where you need to pull the tip before turning it..while Takara one only by turning the tip..
i think it should be mention in the article???
i have both Hasbro and Takara one...
the Hasbro one is the light blue recolor and i noticed its SG has better lock mechanism than Takara one..
The Hasbro SG works just like D : D where you need to pull the tip before turning it..while Takara one only by turning the tip..
i think it should be mention in the article???
I mensioned the color differnce in random thoughts before but nobody replied. I think it's with most dranzers aswell.
![[Image: H3k1N6W.png]](https://i.imgur.com/H3k1N6W.png)
i'm not sure if Original dark blue dranzer f also have the same lock mechanism with the light blue recolor dranzer f though...
Mad Gasher article says that CH120 has a 120 and a 145 height. I was always under the impression that CH120 had 120 and 140 height options, not 145.
No, it's always been 145....
There's no 140 height...
![[Image: Beyprototypes007-1-1-1.jpg]](https://i1057.photobucket.com/albums/t395/DaHyper27/Beyprototypes007-1-1-1.jpg)
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-Dragoon-GT-Article
That thread seems to explain the patchiness of the article...
I hope no one minds if I rewrite it at some point in the near future (hopefully it will get more attention than my Wolborg 2 rewrite), because the article doesn't do the bey justice (if it weren't so expensive, it'd be a far better buy than Dragoon G).
The only part I don't have plenty of experience with is the SG, as mine didn't last long before breaking. I've got a vague idea of it's use (OHKO, basically), and a non-turbo left EG, but if there's anything I don't know I'll run it by someone who has one.
Yo, guy, I updated my wolborg 2 rewrite, because the one on the wiki is riddled with errors.
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-Wolborg-...#pid833418
Hoping it gets some attention this time round :3
I'll try and do a proper Dragoon GT article soon (Dan is nagging me) (EDIT: Done, just working out where to post it), as well as fixing up my Griffolyon Draft at some point (kinda done, it's still not good enough).
At some point in the near future, I will try to go through plastic articles and update them, correct any errors, and complete those that aren't fully finished, though in doing this, I will probably need to speak to someone on the committee who has a good understanding of plastics (*cough*Kei*cough*), to clarify some rules, and just to run things by before I change them. Obviously, I'll only edit things about beys that I have and have used, but that encompasses most plastics anyway. I'll obviously also be going through archives of older forums and the like to check things where possible. Hope that's okay. I know the focus is on MFB but 1) lots of people can write MFB drafts and lots of them can do it better than me. 2) As smug as it sounds, I do know a lot about plastics, and think that I can really improve the wiki, and 3) Plastics are becoming semi-popular again, so I think it's about time to fix things up, as the way drafts were done back then left the opportunity for errors and slip-ups to occur.
That thread seems to explain the patchiness of the article...
I hope no one minds if I rewrite it at some point in the near future (hopefully it will get more attention than my Wolborg 2 rewrite), because the article doesn't do the bey justice (if it weren't so expensive, it'd be a far better buy than Dragoon G).
The only part I don't have plenty of experience with is the SG, as mine didn't last long before breaking. I've got a vague idea of it's use (OHKO, basically), and a non-turbo left EG, but if there's anything I don't know I'll run it by someone who has one.
Yo, guy, I updated my wolborg 2 rewrite, because the one on the wiki is riddled with errors.
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-Wolborg-...#pid833418
Hoping it gets some attention this time round :3
I'll try and do a proper Dragoon GT article soon (Dan is nagging me) (EDIT: Done, just working out where to post it), as well as fixing up my Griffolyon Draft at some point (kinda done, it's still not good enough).
At some point in the near future, I will try to go through plastic articles and update them, correct any errors, and complete those that aren't fully finished, though in doing this, I will probably need to speak to someone on the committee who has a good understanding of plastics (*cough*Kei*cough*), to clarify some rules, and just to run things by before I change them. Obviously, I'll only edit things about beys that I have and have used, but that encompasses most plastics anyway. I'll obviously also be going through archives of older forums and the like to check things where possible. Hope that's okay. I know the focus is on MFB but 1) lots of people can write MFB drafts and lots of them can do it better than me. 2) As smug as it sounds, I do know a lot about plastics, and think that I can really improve the wiki, and 3) Plastics are becoming semi-popular again, so I think it's about time to fix things up, as the way drafts were done back then left the opportunity for errors and slip-ups to occur.
On the Rock Leone page:
"...Rock Leone is consisted of outclassed parts expept for 145,although you can get it from Earth Aquila,which includes better parts. EVERY BLADER SHOULD OWN AT LEAST ONE OF THIS BEY"
"...Rock Leone is consisted of outclassed parts expept for 145,although you can get it from Earth Aquila,which includes better parts. EVERY BLADER SHOULD OWN AT LEAST ONE OF THIS BEY"
I have fixed that. Some user named DaBull123 edited it to that... if I could find out who that user is, they would receive a rather fat warning, but the username pulls up nothing.
Allow me to help. I'm going through and reverting their other two edits, but yeah. They have since changed their name (it was originally DaBull124, by the way), but after a quick google, and the fact names in quotes don't change with name changes (though why the wiki doesn't change too, I don't know), I give you the culprit:
http://worldbeyblade.org/User-MrMew124
Elementary, my dear Hazel, or something witty like that (something about a Ginger Inquisition? I don't know.)
http://worldbeyblade.org/User-MrMew124
Elementary, my dear Hazel, or something witty like that (something about a Ginger Inquisition? I don't know.)