Errors on the wiki ???
Um, there is no article on plastic generation, it comes up with "Plastics is a slang used.....Blah blah.
It pretty much defines what plastics are.
On Flame Byxis' page, it says it's a Stamina type, when it's actually a BALANCE Type
Uhh In the Random Booster Light Vol.3 (might be in others too) it says, "each box. There is 1/8 chance to get each beyblade. All..." It doesn't make sense at all. there is 0 chance of getting each beyblade in this box. It should be "there is 1/8 chance to get the Prize Beyblade, Clay Aries ED145B." Need you guys to approve this before I go on an editing spree.
(Oct. 06, 2011 2:26 PM)JCx06 Wrote: Uhh In the Random Booster Light Vol.3 (might be in others too) it says, "each box. There is 1/8 chance to get each beyblade. All..." It doesn't make sense at all. there is 0 chance of getting each beyblade in this box. It should be "there is 1/8 chance to get the Prize Beyblade, Clay Aries ED145B." Need you guys to approve this before I go on an editing spree.
There is a 1/8 chance of getting any Beyblade, not just the prize Beyblade. There are eight Beyblades possible, so you have one chance on eight of getting one of the eight.
(Sep. 14, 2011 7:41 AM)Janstarblast Wrote: Well, I'd like to ask- Is C145 an extremely good track for Defense against LTACs?
The Flame Sagittario article boasts a lot about this track, especially in the overall.
So, if its not THAT good, can someone edit it?
Hello!!! Please may someone tell me about this?
OK, to make it more convenient, I'll show the part which looked wrong to me-
BeyWiki Overal Wrote:It offers unrivaled Defense capabilities against low Attack types, however, there is a lack of low top-tier attack type combinations in the MFB metagame, causing it to be outclassed.
Even though it says its outclassed, the reason given is quite unlikely. We do have a bunch of powerful LTAC's. Also, the phrase- 'unrivaled Defense' sounds like C145 is an AMAZING Defense track. So, should it be changed?
Yeah, I think BD145 is 100000x better against LTAC than C145.
Maybe someone change it to these points:
-it does prevent low attacks, but that "claws" don't completely nullify it.
-BD145 is rounder, and more plastic collisions helps defense.
-BD145 is wider, so there's less metal contact, and more protection for the Metal Wheel.
-BD145 just weighs more.
But put them in a beautiful paragraph.
Maybe someone change it to these points:
-it does prevent low attacks, but that "claws" don't completely nullify it.
-BD145 is rounder, and more plastic collisions helps defense.
-BD145 is wider, so there's less metal contact, and more protection for the Metal Wheel.
-BD145 just weighs more.
But put them in a beautiful paragraph.
I was wondering, wouldn't Dragoon MS Ultimate Version be considered an alternate version to the regular Dragoon MS and therefore should be mentioned as such in the 'Alternate Versions' sub-heading of the Dragoon MS article?
(Oct. 07, 2011 7:10 PM)Dan Wrote: I was wondering, wouldn't Dragoon MS Ultimate Version be considered an alternate version to the regular Dragoon MS and therefore should be mentioned as such in the 'Alternate Versions' sub-heading of the Dragoon MS article?
No more like an upgrade not an alternate version
Bump king is an endurance type
There is a minute difference other than the ridiculously larger RC rubber, and it was released not too long after Dragoon MS by any means. Whatever ..
phoenix Inferno- No, color differences are not passable reasons to say it was different. We have recolors, you know...
Dan- Yes, even I used to think about this when I was new to this site. I think that the different AR and RC are probably the reasons to call it a completely different beyblade. Even though it was Dragoon, it wasn't a Dragoon MS after all. I mean, most 'Other Versions' are usually recolors, or have a different RC/BB. The AR, has always been the same. Well, beys had their uniqueness in their AR. You wouldn't see a bey having a different AR being considered as another version of a bey. As MSUV had a different one, it is considered as 'different' I guess.
I may be wrong, though. This is just my theory.
Dan- Yes, even I used to think about this when I was new to this site. I think that the different AR and RC are probably the reasons to call it a completely different beyblade. Even though it was Dragoon, it wasn't a Dragoon MS after all. I mean, most 'Other Versions' are usually recolors, or have a different RC/BB. The AR, has always been the same. Well, beys had their uniqueness in their AR. You wouldn't see a bey having a different AR being considered as another version of a bey. As MSUV had a different one, it is considered as 'different' I guess.
I may be wrong, though. This is just my theory.
I belive the AR has slightly more range, or so it seems.
Flame Byxis Overall Wrote:While it is now outclassed by TH170, 230 is a more easily found alternative that still retains one of the most important elements of TH170; its height.
TH170 isn't better of 230. At 170 your combo will lose against all 145 Tracks (I mean Attack combo).
At 195,the situation will be the same.
At 220 you can defeat 230,but it has problem always against 145 Tracks.
Why TH170 should be better of 230?
Because barely anyone uses attack so obviously something like TH170 is going to do well.
Questioning why TH170 is considered better than 230 is ridiculous, no matter what metagame you're in, changing heights is a good thing.
Questioning why TH170 is considered better than 230 is ridiculous, no matter what metagame you're in, changing heights is a good thing.
(Oct. 09, 2011 4:07 PM)Dan Wrote: Because barely anyone uses attack so obviously something like TH170 is going to do well.
Questioning why TH170 is considered better than 230 is ridiculous, no matter what metagame you're in, changing heights is a good thing.
Don't agree.
If,excluding 170 that sometimes work,the other two height doesn't give advantages to the play :\
Byt the way xD
I think in the Dragoon Grip Attacker's article should be add the Other Version section.
I own a clear grip base,so somewhere i guess that exist also the clear AR.
Also,Gianmarco.93 own a blue Grip Attacker,and both of us know that exist also a black Grip Attacker Ver.
Can i add that info?
Yeah, but it usually helps if you know where it came from (exact product box etc)
How do you know they don't have advantages? 220 has advantages, if it didn't, neither would 230.
Test it and then we'll see!!
How do you know they don't have advantages? 220 has advantages, if it didn't, neither would 230.
Test it and then we'll see!!
Nearly all the driger S different versions were missing so i added them:
Spoiler (Click to View)
I'm certain there is a completely clear version, where it is from I know not.
Same, im pretty sure it's just a standard recolor though.
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...ex_SW145SD
??? Are we allowed to do this?
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...atl_125RDF
NO ONE TOLD WE COULD MAKE TEH STUBS!
??? Are we allowed to do this?
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...atl_125RDF
NO ONE TOLD WE COULD MAKE TEH STUBS!
(Nov. 01, 2011 9:02 AM)KaizerMFB Wrote: http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...ex_SW145SD
??? Are we allowed to do this?
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/...atl_125RDF
NO ONE TOLD WE COULD MAKE TEH STUBS!
Only I can do it.
On the Flame Byxis 230WD article, in WD's 'Use in Stamina Customization' column, it is written it can be used with Burn Bull 85WD. I think it should be changed. Burn is not even top tier now and LTSC's aren't really good nowadays. I think it should be changed to Basalt/Phantom/Scythe ______ AD145WD.