(Apr. 19, 2012 5:16 AM)Uwik Wrote: (Apr. 19, 2012 12:19 AM)Galaxy Wrote: You're saying that Blizt vs Vari --> Blitz wins ???
Youre saying that Blitz vs Duo ---> Blitz wins???
I don't know how you shoot and what kind of MG and matches you guys have, but in our MG Blitz is outclassed.
Also, that Blitz is easier to control is quite useless against the Beys of this MG. Personally, I prefer to lose a match because a miss a shoot, and then win the entire battle because I'm stronger.
I agree with Dan, RF is the best tip for Diablo.
1. He's not saying such claims. It is a simple general consensus that Blitz's performance is comparable to VariAres. Having said that, when Flash gets listed, I personally wouldn't mind seeing Blitz crossed off the list. Having 2 on the list is good enough. Imo, Blitz is a tiny bit shadowed under VariAres anyway.
2. 230 is a better track than TH170 for MF-H Duo __ __ MB
3. Yes, I agree that RF is the best bottom for Diablo, but even then, it still under-performs as an attacker compared to VariAres / Flash.
But I stronlgy think that it's a claim if you say that Blitz's performance is comparable to VariAres. I agree with th!nk when he writes that if you say that Blitz isn't a Top Wheel is wrong, but at the same time you guys can't write that must stay in the list.
th!nk wrote that Attack vs Attack is not a common match, but maybe in your country... in our country is the opposite. Then, even if it's not common in your country, you really think that Blitz 100\CH120 RF has chances against a TH170 or a 230?
It's an authomatic match lost.
So why put it in the list if it's only comparable to Variares and against top defensive tracks it loose?
The second question I posted was a provocation, due to the fact that some months ago Cye was arguing with me that TH170 is
always better than 230.
Well done, guys.
If Diablo under-performs against Flash and Vari, why do you think that Blitz should be better?
It isn't a provocation, would just understand your reasons, because with my experience I'm not able to find any difference!
To th!nk: it's strange because I think that Diablo is quite similar to Fang, but with more power.
We in Italy are almost agree about the fact that if you can hit your opponent during the first movements you win, otherwise you loose.
It dependes, if you're lucky, you're unlvky, if you have a good shoot, if you can predict your opponent's shoot, but the fact that has zero stamina in our opinion doesn't mean that it's not good.
Yeah, we in past used RF for defensive\spin stealer combos (for example: Gravity Perseus 90 RF in Left) and I think that th!nk isn't mad. What he says is good, expecially for Italian MG that is
very aggressive, but at the same time i think that with a good shoot you can have the same results with RB... so I really don't know...
The Hazel point of view is correct for sure.. but not at all.
If you say that Blitz got a credible tournament place record, I'll trust you for sure; the problem is: in which kind of tournaments it won?
If you say me a tournament with 19 between Vari and Flash and 1 Blitz on 20 entrants, I'll say: that entrants aren't able to play Vari and Flash. You could think of me that I'm rude, but it's the thruth for me, because I compare your result to results we have in Italy were tournaments are played with all attack combos in general.
If you say me a tournament with a lot of defensive combos and a few attackers, I'll say: it's normal because attackers must be played to defeat defensive combos; so honor to the winner. But it doesn't mean anything because as I said in the precedent example, I'll say that Blitz is excellent only when it will be able to defeat serious attack combos with aggressive players!
As you can see mine and your point of view are quite different, but I think that my thought is credible; so please, explain me your point of view as better as you can, in this way I'll understand also what were you trying to say!
Melseth,il diavolo che si annida nel profondo della mia mente... mi spinge alla distruzione e alla pazzia...