Beyblade parts you want to see come true!

That would be cool. They'd have to make it out of hard plastic though, so the wings didn't break on impact
Guys, Jiraiya Blade.

I'd like to see more shooter/grips. Maybe a successful spring launcher, a successful catapult gripr (maybe in a way that it'd take skill to use), a grip/shooter with bearings at the entrance/exit of the winder
(Aug. 22, 2008  12:20 AM)Cye Kinomiya Wrote: I'd like to see more shooter/grips. Maybe a successful spring launcher, a successful catapult gripr (maybe in a way that it'd take skill to use), a grip/shooter with bearings at the entrance/exit of the winder

The catapult grip could have a trigger that needs to be pulled, like the "gun" concept discussed earlier. Hmm bearings, wouldn't that be similar to the roller support?
(Aug. 22, 2008  1:27 AM)Nic Wrote:
(Aug. 22, 2008  12:20 AM)Cye Kinomiya Wrote: I'd like to see more shooter/grips. Maybe a successful spring launcher, a successful catapult gripr (maybe in a way that it'd take skill to use), a grip/shooter with bearings at the entrance/exit of the winder

The catapult grip could have a trigger that needs to be pulled, like the "gun" concept discussed earlier. Hmm bearings, wouldn't that be similar to the roller support?

Which reminds me, how was the roller support? It looked useful, but was it, really?

To contribute: I'd like to see an all-metal Bottom.
Common Sense tells me that that would be good for defense. :\
Maybe it would be usable in compacts to a certain degree...?
can anyone think ofa a good simple base design for attack types other than using a rubbr tip or having fins/spikes coming off of it?
How about a blade with a constant EG? I don't mean like Wolborg 4/Rock Bison's, I mean like when Dragoon G's EG goes off, but all the way through the battle (Maybe toned down a bit so it didn't self KO)take lot of winding up, but it could work IMO
A short, metal tip BB able to use SP would be nice to have.
(Aug. 22, 2008  10:25 AM)ChozenBlader Wrote: Maybe it would be usable in compacts to a certain degree...?

Well, no, since Compacts need to be mobile, and I was thinking of an all-metal Bottom for defense purposes.
...unless you weren't talking to me (...?).
I was, lol. I just figured that seeing as a Draciel S base with 4 balls can be used, that a metal base would have roughly the same effect. Sorry
(Aug. 23, 2008  8:23 PM)ChozenBlader Wrote: I was, lol. I just figured that seeing as a Draciel S base with 4 balls can be used, that a metal base would have roughly the same effect. Sorry

No, it's fine. I was referring to a MFB part, though, since Blade Bases can't be used on MFBs.
ohhh, I get you now. And yeah, that would be intersting.
I think it would be cool to see ball bearings used in a base desing for thir actual purpose(lower friction between moving parts), maybe in a free spinning attackring base type thing(like trygle but the base wings that attack rotate freely)....kinda working like a double attackring but betta.
For the MFBs i'd like to see a wheel base off a turtles shell, and a wheel based off a gear would be cool too.
I'd like to see a free spinning AR. When a screw in a screw base is slightly loose, when you put an AR on, it acts like a sub AR. A legal version of this would be good for defence I think
(Aug. 26, 2008  12:52 PM)ChozenBlader Wrote: I'd like to see a free spinning AR. When a screw in a screw base is slightly loose, when you put an AR on, it acts like a sub AR. A legal version of this would be good for defence I think
Actually, Brad mentioned something like this before:

(Aug. 02, 2008  1:56 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: Although difficult to implement, a Track that allows the AR to stay still while spinning at fast speeds, but a clutch activates that makes it free-spinning at lower speeds, could be really neat.
It would work the same as Driger F's Full Auto Clutch Base, only the clutches hold the Attack Ring at high speeds, not the tip. At high speeds, the AR would be held in place, like a normal one, but at low speeds, the AR would be free-spinning, aiding with defense and lessening recoil.

...so...

What do you people think the "S" in WolfS105B stands for?

I'm thinking it's a type of Track, since Libra has an extra letter like Wolf. "Smooth 105", maybe? Or "Small 105"?

It could be "Subring, but I dunno.
(Aug. 26, 2008  10:51 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Shaft?

As in Shaft Track...I wonder how that could work with disconnecting Bottoms.
(Aug. 26, 2008  10:12 PM)Grey Wrote: What do you people think the "S" in WolfS105B stands for?

I'm thinking it's a type of Track, since Libra has an extra letter like Wolf. "Smooth 105", maybe? Or "Small 105"?

It could be "Subring, but I dunno.
It is 'S125', not 'S105'.

[EDIT :] And, actually, the S125 is for Libra. D125 is for Wolf (Starter).
(Aug. 27, 2008  12:46 AM)Kai-V Wrote:
(Aug. 26, 2008  10:12 PM)Grey Wrote: What do you people think the "S" in WolfS105B stands for?

I'm thinking it's a type of Track, since Libra has an extra letter like Wolf. "Smooth 105", maybe? Or "Small 105"?

It could be "Subring, but I dunno.
It is 'S125', not 'S105'.

[EDIT :] And, actually, the S125 is for Libra. D125 is for Wolf (Starter).

Huh, that site lied to me, then. I couldn't get to the Beywiki page, so I looked at some random Beyblade site. :\

Thank you, Kai-V, for both correcting me and telling me what Libra's name was. Smile

So, if "S" means "Shaft" (hypothetically), and Libra has a Metal Sharp tip, then...that means that MS tip was a shaft tip...? I dunno, just throwing ideas out there.

For Wolf...I'm not sure what "D" could stand for, either.
I'd like to see a Metal/Rubber Change bottom.
Imagine FS, the sharp tip made out of metal, the rest out of rubber. The difference in movements would be way more intense.

edit:
(Jul. 28, 2008  2:03 AM)Grey Wrote: I'd also like to see a Rubber-Metal hybrid tip. It could work like the Metal Change Base, with a metal tip in the center for endurance and rubber surrounding the metal, so that when it was hit, the blade could go into attack mode.

haha forget my post.
OLD THREAD
good idea though but we've already got FS
I know it's an old thread, but I got a new idea.
If you go by that logic, we'll have rubber flat and then no new parts anymore.

And do you really think there will be no metal change in MFB?
It's really good to experiment with new part concepts, even if some suck and get outclassed.
/your right but you called it FS when it'd have to be called RMFS or something
He meant it would be like FS. Anyways, I think that's a really cool idea. Grin