(Jan. 18, 2012 1:58 PM)Arupaeo Wrote: Metaphors are fine as long as we stay on this side of the line and don't cross over into nickname territory. For example, I wouldn't want to see that particular metaphor repeated again in describing the same combo.
I am quite sure Janstarblast and I are very much aware of the fact nicknames are off limits (especially after you gave Dan his first warning for merely using one in passing over in the Advanced Forum instead of simply asking him to remove it given there is no way that was anything more than a small oversight on his part), and if anyone started calling MF-H Diablo Nemesis BD145R2F "the steamroller" or something based off Janstarblast using a rather appropriate metaphor and me responding by repeating that metaphor, a characteristic of my natural writing style, then they probably wouldn't last long on this site anyway.
As for metaphors being within the rules as long as we only liken a combination to any one thing through that literary device twice, that's reassuring and I will try to keep it in mind in future. Is the limit more or less for similes? Also, would it be okay if we compared the combo to a steamroller via simile after two posts of using it as a metaphor, or would that tilt the scales to far?
I just want to get a picture for what threshold of literary device usage tips the scales into "immediate warning" territory, and the weighting on each literary device. Are there actually any others we should be wary of lest we find ourselves a few percentage points closer to being banned from the site?
I've made a suggestion about making these and other rules clearer over in
Make Your Suggestions. I'd love some feedback from you about it.
Anyway, I think I'd best go make sure I haven't used any metaphors twice in the 20 or so wiki articles I'm working on at the moment.