(Oct. 29, 2014 1:34 AM)Echizen Wrote: The 10 tests was only a problem against an inconsistent attack type. For the most part, defense types are fairly consistent. And I already told you W145WD is the same height as GB145RSF...
It's totally not. RSF is a tall tip and WD is a short tip. If your RSF is worn so much that it's as short as a WD you're going to need a new one.
(Oct. 29, 2014 1:43 AM)Leone19 Wrote: First off, let me say this is a cool idea. BI kind of have an idea of the point I want to make about this but I can't really put my thoughts into words very well right now so I'll give it my best shot.is definitely a bit underrated in some aspects.
Quote:"Top-tier" doesn't mean "accurate." It means "relevant." The tier of the Beyblade you use in comparison testing like this doesn't matter. You're only allowed to use competitive combinations in custom threads because they are used to gauge the ability of a combination in battle, not the specific, relative properties of a single part.
I get the general idea of this, but no offence, I think the wording could be a bit... better?
I mean, you can't just test something like Dark Gemios W145 CS, say it loses to Band proves the point. I know that's taking it out of context, but it could easily be misinterpreted like that.
Personally, I just felt the wording could be misinterpreted- similar to the example I gave.
The opponent is like the control custom, and while it shouldn't be Dark Gemios W105CS and lose 20-0 proving the point, it also shouldn't be Blitz Kerbecs CH120RF and win 20-0 proving the point either. It does have to be semi-competent but give B

I guess this was a bad attempt at trying to word it better...?