(Jun. 27, 2014 8:25 PM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 27, 2014 7:49 PM)Neo~ Wrote: [ -> ]Spike Dragon* that was a typo.
Maybe G Upper because it has 4 bigger spikes, but Eight Spiker has extremely small spikes.
I don't understand the relevance of that comment about the numbers of spikes.
I was saying that both G Upper and Eight Spiker are better than Spike Dragon.
The increase in numbers, but decrease in size.
It has more coverage, but less massive hits.
(Jun. 27, 2014 8:36 PM)Neo~ Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 27, 2014 8:25 PM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 27, 2014 7:49 PM)Neo~ Wrote: [ -> ]Spike Dragon* that was a typo.
Maybe G Upper because it has 4 bigger spikes, but Eight Spiker has extremely small spikes.
I don't understand the relevance of that comment about the numbers of spikes.
I was saying that both G Upper and Eight Spiker are better than Spike Dragon.
The increase in numbers, but decrease in size.
It has more coverage, but less massive hits.
I know the effect of numbers of contact points
That's not what I was asking for an explanation of.
I wanted to know why you think it's relevant to the discussion we're having.
The point I'm making, and the one I've been making this entire time, is that Spike Dragon isn't worth the risk it takes to use it effectively since better parts already exist, the ones I've already mentioned: G Upper & Eight Spiker.
(Jun. 27, 2014 10:39 PM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 27, 2014 8:36 PM)Neo~ Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 27, 2014 8:25 PM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ]I don't understand the relevance of that comment about the numbers of spikes.
I was saying that both G Upper and Eight Spiker are better than Spike Dragon.
The increase in numbers, but decrease in size.
It has more coverage, but less massive hits.
I know the effect of numbers of contact points
That's not what I was asking for an explanation of.
I wanted to know why you think it's relevant to the discussion we're having.
The point I'm making, and the one I've been making this entire time, is that Spike Dragon isn't worth the risk it takes to use it effectively since better parts already exist, the ones I've already mentioned: G Upper & Eight Spiker.
But as I said before; Eight Attacker and Spike Dragon are effectively better then the smaller spikes of Eight Spiker, and while G Upper fixes this; it's rare and hard to obtain for everyone.
I seriously give up.
You're just being obstinate.
Did I ever say anything about what's hard or easy to obtain? Did I ever mention price or availability?
Notice how Eight Spiker has evenly sized and spaced spikes? That's good.
Notice how Eight Attacker has two differently sized spikes, and large gaps between sets of spikes? That's bad.
(Jun. 28, 2014 12:10 AM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ]I seriously give up.
You're just being obstinate.
Did I ever say anything about what's hard or easy to obtain? Did I ever mention price or availability?
Notice how Eight Spiker has evenly sized and spaced spikes? That's good.
Notice how Eight Attacker has two differently sized spikes, and large gaps between sets of spikes? That's bad.
What I'm saying is that Eight Attacker and Spike Dragon have huge blades that perform well in smash attack, and while Eight Attacker has a very balanced attack (Great Endurance as well.) it does Smash as well. G Upper is a significant improvement over the other two, however it's a rare part, so the cheap Alternative is Eight Attacker or Spike Dragon.
It's all depends on the play style you use. For me, I love big hits that end in fast victories with a chance of a draw or death. You like being safe; with moderate smash attack and evenly distributed attack power. And that's all good
Sorry if I made you PO'd xD
Hehe, i just schooled in maturity by someone almost 10 years my junior.
Sorry for throwing a hissy fit like a real female dog bro!
(Jun. 28, 2014 1:48 AM)Bastion Wrote: [ -> ]Hehe, i just schooled in maturity by someone almost 10 years my junior.
Sorry for throwing a hissy fit like a real female dog bro!
Ah, it's just a small trait.
No problem, though.
I'll be testing the effects of Recoil AR's soon on Engine Gear bases to see how the RPM affects 1 Hit KnockOuts.
If this goes well, there might be some use against other EG's, consider how tall they are.
That's not a Wolborg MS, haha. It's a plastic beyblade, Wolborg 1. That price is insane though, you should be able to find it much cheaper.
(Jun. 28, 2014 3:59 AM)Echizen Wrote: [ -> ]That's not a Wolborg MS, haha. It's a plastic beyblade, Wolborg 1. That price is insane though, you should be able to find it much cheaper.
*facepalm* thats the only wolborg on ebay but i guess amazon and other sites might have it though I may have to use YJA
edit: Know anyone selling one on the WBO? I cant find any the only one I found was $100
Oh yeah. taxus has one for about $89. (partially eBay tax) NIB, fast shipments.
But this is the PLASTICS Q&A. Not HMS. Go back there >.>
So: an illegal combo?
Double weight disks probably aren't good on War Lion, possibly another AR.
not many can support it, as you need the extra clearance, and i said war monkey not war lion (also can work thou)
dont have one, from the looks of this:
http://www.zangeki.com/pic/figure/beybla...8_back.jpg
it should work!
The top weight disk has to sit over the AR and the bottom one has to hang over the base, otherwise you can't fit your AR, its tight enough as it is.
A lot of small bases should work.
Yeah, that's what I thought. It seems like Dragon Saucer is a thick S-AR.
I just think its cool that you can fit dual disks using real parts! (and its kickass)
We can't get close to Tryhorn's 5(?) attack rings stacked.
i guess, so are you able to make one of these dual disk blades?
(Jul. 04, 2014 6:26 AM)legend! Wrote: [ -> ]"STATS":
ATTACK : 2/4
DEFENSE: 4/4
STAMINA: 6/4
Just a little note, the stats on the boxes etc are utterly useless
(Jul. 04, 2014 5:16 PM)TortoiseGrenade Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul. 04, 2014 6:26 AM)legend! Wrote: [ -> ]"STATS":
ATTACK : 2/4
DEFENSE: 4/4
STAMINA: 6/4
Just a little note, the stats on the boxes etc are utterly useless
Like Seaborg's base. It should have 100 attack stars.
So I just ran some tests on parts and combos for Stamina-based blades I threw together. And the puzzling thing for me, in spite of the results, the combo with the lowest spin time outperforms all of the others that have a higher spin time. How does this even work?
Testing and performance results: (Warning: I only do 3 test runs, and 3 battles per performance test to save time.)
Spin time results:
Keep in mind that the bearings from MDBS have been swapped with the metal bearings from two copies of Wolborg 2.
Combo: Wing Cross, 10 Heavy, Bearing Base (MDBS)
Test 1: 2:14.096
Test 2: 2:29.336
Test 3: 2:05.022
Test Average: 2:16.151
Combo: Smash Turtle, 10 Heavy, Bearing Base (MDBS)
Test 1: 1:32.166
Test 2: 1:49.047
Test 3: 1:43.561
Test Average: 2:14.925
Combo: War Lion, War Lion, 10 Heavy, Bearing Base (MDBS)
Test 1: 1:43.474
Test 2: 2:01.277
Test 3: 2:16.827
Test Average: 2:00.526
Combo: (WBO Stamina/Defense) Roller Defense Ring, 10 Balance, Right EG Normal, Slow Release (Wolborg 4), Circle Survivor (Wolborg 4)
Test 1: 1:26.759
Test 2: 1:18.810
Test 3: 1:18.491
Test Average: 1:21.353
Battle Performance Results:
Note: All Beyblades are launched level to the Stadium floor, and using official Takara/Hasbro/Sono Kong Dragon Winders. Alternating launches, G-Rev Attack-style Stadium (Sono Kong).
WBO Combo vs Wing Cross:
Round 1: WBO Victory, Sleep out
Round 2: Wing Cross Victory, Stadium out
Round 3: WBO Victory, Sleep out
WBO Combo vs Smash Turtle:
Round 1: WBO Victory, Sleep out
Round 2: WBO Victory, Sleep out
Round 3: WBO Victory, Sleep out
WBO Combo vs War Lion:
Round 1: WBO Victory, Sleep out
Round 2: WBO Victory, Sleep out
Round 3: WBO Victory, Sleep out
I honestly have no idea how this logic works, outside the WBO Combo being a total tank.