Eh, as I said, too much recoil. I don't think it's a versatile wheel. The only time mf outspins cs is on left spin blades

(Feb. 14, 2011 1:37 PM)lightninglibraX Wrote: well umm wouldnt it have been better to put something like cs on the combo? cuz im pretty sure thats better than HF/S. also could you show tests somewhere else about the bull flame combo?
(Feb. 14, 2011 1:40 PM)bigbangblaze Wrote: the reason i used HF/S is because its the tallest bottom and with the tallest track its great and provides alot of stamina im just saying that screw completely destroys the use of 230! and no prob ill post them on a 230 thread or make my own thread!
(Feb. 16, 2011 11:54 AM)NitroNeo Wrote: @ Kei -
For me my combo of Rock Leone 145 hf / S [ on S Mode ] beat Earth Aquila 145 WD , 2 out of 3 times , it maybe that i am not testing on BB-10 , that maybe the cause but seriously hf/S is decent for stamina i am going to do more tests with it
(Feb. 16, 2011 8:18 PM)Kei Wrote:(Feb. 16, 2011 11:54 AM)NitroNeo Wrote: @ Kei -
For me my combo of Rock Leone 145 hf / S [ on S Mode ] beat Earth Aquila 145 WD , 2 out of 3 times , it maybe that i am not testing on BB-10 , that maybe the cause but seriously hf/S is decent for stamina i am going to do more tests with it
Seriously? Something is definitely up ... is your WD worn? And Rock shouldn't be beating Earth ...
(Mar. 20, 2011 12:45 AM)Themailman Wrote: I would postulate that to maximize the upper attack we should go AS LOW AS POSSIBLE!!!!! So I would like to ask for a test of MF Screw ______ 85WF (WF is shorter then RF). I say MF because it would add stability, after all if Screw doesn't have enough stability, it will push its self into the floor.
Also, in reference to the "Fat kid, Little kid," speed weight thing, you all are right and wrong, what matters is FORCE! which is a function of speed times mass(weight). So if you have a feather going a bazillion(technical term) miles an hour, it will not do nearly as much damage as something going half as fast with four times the mass.
(Mar. 20, 2011 2:31 AM)Mr. N Wrote: Upper Attack isn't effective in MFB, since metal on metal has too much recoil.
(Mar. 20, 2011 2:38 AM)lord Wolfblade Wrote:Dark has no slopes.(Mar. 20, 2011 2:31 AM)Mr. N Wrote: Upper Attack isn't effective in MFB, since metal on metal has too much recoil.
I (and IIRC a couple others) disagree, i have had midnight (and dark![]()
) lift an opponent in the air with there slopes (you could see the opponent move up the slopes) ...
but, screw's slopes wont do that good for upper at all because the slopes are not the right shape for it (i think)
(Mar. 20, 2011 2:43 AM)Ultimate Wrote:(Mar. 20, 2011 2:38 AM)lord Wolfblade Wrote:Dark has no slopes.(Mar. 20, 2011 2:31 AM)Mr. N Wrote: Upper Attack isn't effective in MFB, since metal on metal has too much recoil.
I (and IIRC a couple others) disagree, i have had midnight (and dark![]()
) lift an opponent in the air with there slopes (you could see the opponent move up the slopes) ...
but, screw's slopes wont do that good for upper at all because the slopes are not the right shape for it (i think)
As far as i'm aware.
(Mar. 20, 2011 2:57 AM)GaleForce Wrote: Upper attack, I consider to be the WORST IDEA EVER INVENTED IN BEYBLADE!!!! It's not that effective and the attacks don't end up KOing the opponent. Dark has no use, except in defense, and to get it to upper attack is one in a million. Midnight has BIG slopes that make it upper attack quite well...