(Jul. 01, 2016 10:13 PM)Jinbee Wrote: While you are physically involved, you really only launch it as most of it is just watching and hoping you'll win, whereas many other sports, you are fully involved, or mostly at least, which does make Battle Strikers more of a sport IMO. I also don't think Beyblade is taken as seriously as other sports and it's appeal is mainly towards children, whereas other sports like chess and soccer are played by people of all ages. These might be invalid reasons but that's what I think.
Yes, they are highly invalid reasons. You have no more control and far less player interaction with something like darts (a serious sport) than with beyblade. And calling chess a sport seems ridiculous to me. It's a competitive game but involes about as much physical input as water involves chewing.
Beyblade being aimed at children is like muggle quidditch being aimed at nerds. Neither is a respected pastime but that has no affect on whether it's a sport or not.
And, to try and refute one of Brad's complaints made prior to this thread, let's talk about how it's exculsive to one company. Or rather, how ultimate dodgeball, a high stakes game of extreme physical skill and prowess, has never been housed by any company other than Skyland. Nor can any competitor train elsewhere because the stadiums just do not exist.
Yes, this is a little different since beyblade is owned by Takara Tomy and Skyland only monopilises the ultimate dodgeball scene but there is no reason, hypothetically speaking, why TT couldn't become the overseers of a multi-company spinning top community. Not that that'll ever happen.
Even then though, being a sport is about the nature of a game, not who owns it. Who owns it and who its target demographic are only dictate how it is financed and whether it's broadcast and such.
Beyblade will never be an olympic sport but it is still as much of a sport as darts (which is, IMO, a very questionable case but that's not the point).