Now my fakes are gone.
Sympathy lies here for the usual people who sell fakes and think they're authentic...
Sympathy lies here for the usual people who sell fakes and think they're authentic...
(Jun. 28, 2009 7:03 AM)MS-Ash Wrote: Your a very negative person Brad, it's just a god damn fake.
What, the world's going to end if I use it??
(Jun. 21, 2009 6:56 PM)Gadget Wrote: Ew, Traditional. Also, a bit of advice, you should put more monsters in your deck and even everything out. I highly doubt this wins on the first turn.
(Jun. 28, 2009 7:50 AM)MS-Ash Wrote: I only thouught good cards were coming from their effects, the reason I ignored your reply is because I play Pokemon TCG, and almost all my deck consists of Rare Lv.X Promos, which are extremely good and rare cards.
My big brother used simple cards like Jolteon, Espeon, Maybe 1 Walrein, not something that says WOW.
And he beat me (EVERY SINGLE TIME)
I kept on customizing with a Rayquaza, Lugia Palkia Lv.X etc, and I never won.
(Jun. 28, 2009 5:05 PM)Newt Wrote: also trad format is waaaay more diverse than advanced.theres a lot more playable decks in trad if you want a t1 deck in advanced you play LS ,BW or Catrocket
(Jul. 02, 2009 12:37 AM)Newt Wrote: not all decks in traditional are set out to OTK of FTK as a lot of them can be stopped by a well placed solemn or imperial order.
(Jul. 02, 2009 4:27 AM)Synesthesia Wrote: But they all can, and should be able to easily. Every aspect of traditional is broken.
Here's your control cards that if more than one drawn at the same time will usually spell game:
Delinquent Duo, Confiscation, The Forceful Sentry, and Imperial Order all are extremely game-breaking forms of control that should have never been created.
Let's look at the draw power you have at your disposal:
Pot of Greed, Graceful Charity, Mirage of Nightmare, Allure of Darkness, and Destiny Draw; I'm sure I'm missing some, but you get the point. I'll draw into whatever I need REALLY quickly.
If Traditional was ever made the main format again, some of the better players in the game would pioneer a few extremely powerful deck types, and games would be over in a matter of a few turns, just like it was before the forbidden list; In fact, worse because of how many more options you have now to OTK.
As of right now, there aren't enough Traditional players to even take anything going on there seriously. You can blow up your opponents entire field in multiple ways without losing ANY card advantage, that's enough for most people to disregard traditional as a vintage format to entertain less competitive players, which is what it is.
(Jul. 02, 2009 3:04 PM)Giga Wrote: No, Traditional is for the richest people. Whoever has the best Chaos deck wins.
(Jul. 02, 2009 2:19 PM)Newt Wrote: Confiscation isnt broken you have to pay a 8th of your lp to take 1 card away from your opponent. Its a horrible late game topdeck and it was only ever good 1st turn.Yep, a card is sub-par if it isn't a good late game top deck. Dark Armed Dragon is also a Sub-par card.
Mirage of night mare was only good if you drew into MST or dust tornado so you didnt have to discard the cards. Also Dheros are terrible in traditional theres waaay better cards to play.
I like how you listed 2 sub par cards yet you forgot to mention yata CED and BLS. Traditional isnt for "less competative players" its for players who want to have fun with extremely broken cards and new deck types.
you have to admit top tier advanced play is boring and stale. At the moment its play 3 threatning roar or loose.
(Jul. 03, 2009 8:16 AM)Synesthesia Wrote: Yep, a card is sub-par if it isn't a good late game top deck. Dark Armed Dragon is also a Sub-par card.I loled when i read that my opinion on a card makes me a bad player?????.
Confiscation is an amazing card. Pay 1000 to see your opponents hand, play around and disrupt their strategy by discarding a card. You are an awful player if you think confiscation is sub-par.
(Jul. 06, 2009 10:09 PM)Newt Wrote: I loled when i read that my opinion on a card makes me a bad player?????.
Exactly how many Cvalue 2 tourneys have you won? and how many Cvalue 3 tourneys have you played in and what did you finish with?
i highly doubt youve won a jump or a reigonals id love to see your competative record but upperdeck removed them all.
(Jul. 06, 2009 10:33 PM)Synesthesia Wrote: Haha, let's completely ignore the fact that you said an amazing card was sub-par and ask irrelevant questions to attempt to make an awful point. Also, let's ignore every other point I made because you are awful at actual discussion, and had your ego hurt because I pointed out that you can't recognize why a great card is great.
Anyone who says Virgo is a sub-par beyblade because it's not good in EVERY situation is a bad player. This applies to you also, regardless of what your standings are. Also, you're arguing that Advanced is somehow worse than Traditional, so I'm lead to believe that you're just some one who spouts off absolute nonsense in a vain attempt to make a dead format seem appealing.
Your rankings/events you've won aren't relative to how good a player you are, for your information. It just means you've participated in more events, and had good results. Implying that some one isn't a good player because they don't have large amounts of tournament wins is like saying one of our staff members are awful at beyblade because they didn't have high rankings in the previous system.
I'm assuming this discussion is done now since you seem to be running out of decent rebuttals.
Please continue if you want further sully any bit of credibility you had here.