World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. Other Closed Threads

Cyclone discussion

Feb. 20, 2013  7:24 PM
 
Why ?

Because I realized that there were not tests for Cyclone.
Also, because I was wondering about it's capabilities , since I've barely used mine.

Standard procedure used

MF Cyclone Nemesis 90R2F vs Death Capricorne AD145SD

MF Cyclone Nemesis 90R2F: 4 (KO) [40% win]
Death Capricorne AD145SD: 6 (OS) [60% win]

MF Cyclone Nemesis 105MF vs Basalt Horogium 135RS

MF Cyclone Nemesis 105MF: 3 (OS) 1 (KO) [40% win]
Basalt Horogium 135RS: 5 (OS) 1 (SKO) [60% win]

Cyclone Nemesis 105MF vs Basalt Horogium 135RS (This is to find out how much difference the Metal Face was making Pinching_eyes_2)
Cyclone Nemesis 105MF: 1 (KO) 2 (OS) [30% win]
Basalt Horogium 135RS: 7 (OS) [70% win]

MF Cyclone Nemesis 105R2F vs MF Orojya Orojya 230MB (Felt like zero-g tests were needed)

MF Cyclone Nemesis 105R2F: 1 (KO) 1 (OS) [20% win]
MF Orojya Orojya 230MB: 4 (OS) 2 (SKO) [60% win]
2 draws

This surprised me , Cyclone seemed to hold up reasonably well , although the recoil seemed pretty horrible, along with its stamina .
My overall opinion (So far) is that Cyclone is about as useful as we thought , although maybe a bit better :L

I will add tests & do request [if I have the parts available]
I was not completely sure what to test it against and what parts to use with it , so if anyone has better suggestions , please tell me Smile

Worn parts used:
R2F & RS

Thanks Grin
Feb. 20, 2013  8:34 PM
 
For the sake of completeness, I guess this is nice, but not really useful since it's obvious it'd do poorly...
Feb. 20, 2013  8:38 PM
 
(Feb. 20, 2013  8:34 PM)Ingulit Wrote: For the sake of completeness, I guess this is nice, but not really useful since it's obvious it'd do poorly...

Yes, I know ...
But I was actually really quite surprised that nobody tested it before , around the time it came out .
And you must admit that it has held up better than expects, no?
Plus , as you said , it's nice to have a nice sense of completeness . And it would look good to have a full 'database' of results.
I'm currently testing it against some zero-g combos ...
Feb. 20, 2013  9:06 PM
 
I think the same, It's really nice to have a complete database, because it not just does that, some people like this "useless" parts, so they can search for it and make a "fun combo" based on the results

Can you test it with CS or RDF in a little higher track (CH120, S130, BD145, W145)? I don't think it would perform better, but I would like to see what can it do with a more "balance type" set up
Feb. 20, 2013  10:26 PM
 
(Feb. 20, 2013  9:06 PM)Izhkoort Wrote: I think the same, It's really nice to have a complete database, because it not just does that, some people like this "useless" parts, so they can search for it and make a "fun combo" based on the results

Can you test it with CS or RDF in a little higher track (CH120, S130, BD145, W145)? I don't think it would perform better, but I would like to see what can it do with a more "balance type" set up

I'll see if I can try BD145/S130RDF tomorrow Smile

EDIT: Turns out I lost my RDF - would RSF suffice ? Or something else ?
Feb. 20, 2013  11:01 PM
 
this is cyclone as in cyclone herculeo right

because that's called tornado

and seriously, what the actual hell is with the number of tests, in one you did like 8, excluding ties

The reason Tornado has no tests is because up until a year ago, you had to dish out a massive amount of cash to get the stadium it came with. Vulcan outdid it, and it was set aside because even back then it wasn't that great of an Attack Metal Wheel.
Feb. 20, 2013  11:11 PM
 
I suppose RSF can be a substitute, the problem is that it will not have the same behaviour
Feb. 20, 2013  11:16 PM
 
Quote:Standard procedure used

Blatant lie. Standard Procedure dictates a minimum of twenty rounds per test.

What you have posted here is just entirely worthless; if you're not packing adequate tests, even for an old wheel, do not make a thread.