+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Cyclone discussion (/Thread-Cyclone-discussion)
Cyclone discussion - Luck - Feb. 20, 2013
Why ?
Because I realized that there were not tests for Cyclone.
Also, because I was wondering about it's capabilities , since I've barely used mine.
Also, because I was wondering about it's capabilities , since I've barely used mine.
Standard procedure used
MF Cyclone Nemesis 90R2F vs Death Capricorne AD145SD
MF Cyclone Nemesis 90R2F: 4 (KO) [40% win]
Death Capricorne AD145SD: 6 (OS) [60% win]
MF Cyclone Nemesis 105MF vs Basalt Horogium 135RS
MF Cyclone Nemesis 105MF: 3 (OS) 1 (KO) [40% win]
Basalt Horogium 135RS: 5 (OS) 1 (SKO) [60% win]
Cyclone Nemesis 105MF vs Basalt Horogium 135RS (This is to find out how much difference the Metal Face was making
)Cyclone Nemesis 105MF: 1 (KO) 2 (OS) [30% win]
Basalt Horogium 135RS: 7 (OS) [70% win]
MF Cyclone Nemesis 105R2F vs MF Orojya Orojya 230MB (Felt like zero-g tests were needed)
MF Cyclone Nemesis 105R2F: 1 (KO) 1 (OS) [20% win]
MF Orojya Orojya 230MB: 4 (OS) 2 (SKO) [60% win]
2 draws
This surprised me , Cyclone seemed to hold up reasonably well , although the recoil seemed pretty horrible, along with its stamina .
My overall opinion (So far) is that Cyclone is about as useful as we thought , although maybe a bit better :L
I will add tests & do request [if I have the parts available]
I was not completely sure what to test it against and what parts to use with it , so if anyone has better suggestions , please tell me
Worn parts used:
R2F & RS
Thanks
RE: Cyclone discussion - Ingulit - Feb. 20, 2013
For the sake of completeness, I guess this is nice, but not really useful since it's obvious it'd do poorly...
RE: Cyclone discussion - Luck - Feb. 20, 2013
(Feb. 20, 2013 8:34 PM)Ingulit Wrote: For the sake of completeness, I guess this is nice, but not really useful since it's obvious it'd do poorly...
Yes, I know ...
But I was actually really quite surprised that nobody tested it before , around the time it came out .
And you must admit that it has held up better than expects, no?
Plus , as you said , it's nice to have a nice sense of completeness . And it would look good to have a full 'database' of results.
I'm currently testing it against some zero-g combos ...
RE: Cyclone discussion - Izhkoort - Feb. 20, 2013
I think the same, It's really nice to have a complete database, because it not just does that, some people like this "useless" parts, so they can search for it and make a "fun combo" based on the results
Can you test it with CS or RDF in a little higher track (CH120, S130, BD145, W145)? I don't think it would perform better, but I would like to see what can it do with a more "balance type" set up
RE: Cyclone discussion - Luck - Feb. 20, 2013
(Feb. 20, 2013 9:06 PM)Izhkoort Wrote: I think the same, It's really nice to have a complete database, because it not just does that, some people like this "useless" parts, so they can search for it and make a "fun combo" based on the results
Can you test it with CS or RDF in a little higher track (CH120, S130, BD145, W145)? I don't think it would perform better, but I would like to see what can it do with a more "balance type" set up
I'll see if I can try BD145/S130RDF tomorrow
EDIT: Turns out I lost my RDF - would RSF suffice ? Or something else ?
RE: Cyclone discussion - Raigeko13 - Feb. 20, 2013
this is cyclone as in cyclone herculeo right
because that's called tornado
and seriously, what the actual hell is with the number of tests, in one you did like 8, excluding ties
The reason Tornado has no tests is because up until a year ago, you had to dish out a massive amount of cash to get the stadium it came with. Vulcan outdid it, and it was set aside because even back then it wasn't that great of an Attack Metal Wheel.
RE: Cyclone discussion - Izhkoort - Feb. 20, 2013
I suppose RSF can be a substitute, the problem is that it will not have the same behaviour
RE: Cyclone discussion - Hazel - Feb. 20, 2013
Quote:Standard procedure used
Blatant lie. Standard Procedure dictates a minimum of twenty rounds per test.
What you have posted here is just entirely worthless; if you're not packing adequate tests, even for an old wheel, do not make a thread.