(Dec. 13, 2011 3:43 AM)th!nk Wrote: For what it helps, Dracomageat, MF-M and MF-L are easiest remembered by their centres. I just remember it as MF-M(etal core) and MF-L(ight core).
Actually, that kind of does help. Thanks.
It will still take a lot of getting used to though.
(Dec. 13, 2011 7:05 AM)Galaxy Jay Wrote: Thats right.
LIGHTNING L DRAGO!!!!
I really don't see anything wrong with LLD and,for me atleast, it appears to outperform "top tier" attack wheels.
(Dec. 13, 2011 10:41 AM)njrk97 Wrote: only when used in a way it is not desighned to be used in the rev up is also inconsistant in launch speed and breaks easily
In my experience, misuse of the rev-up launcher gives it the most consistent launch speed of any beyblade launcher, though it began to break after 2 or 3 days of use so...
(Dec. 13, 2011 3:15 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: Well, TT releases stuff before Hasbro. And the terms which TT uses, become standard, and official terms which are used throughout in any conversation.
I forgot this bit since I don't tend to import on release.
(Dec. 13, 2011 3:15 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: I am sure that most of us still do not call a Basalt as Twisted; and I've never (literally) seen anyone call Hell- Hades or Screw- Spiral; except for when there new names were announced.
I use "Twisted" occasionally and I certainly like "Burn Tempo" as a name but "Hades" is clearly a clear wheel name so using it for a metal wheel would just be weird.
Oddly, "Thunder" seems to be the accepted name for Legend Libra though, despite the japanese name being worlds better.
(Dec. 13, 2011 3:15 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: As for a BeyLauncher, it causes no confusion for me as it does for you.
I am quite surprised why people get confused with this term, but that is probably because I am so accustomed to this term. I would rather get confused if people start calling it a String Launcher.
I have come to understand what is meant by the term but it has taken a long time to do so since it really does sound like it could mean anything that launches a beyblade.
(Dec. 13, 2011 3:15 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: TT had good reasons to make the name change. They certainly knew that it would be sensible to name it a String Launcher, but they couldn't do it because there is an HMS launcher by the same name.
As for Hasbro, no comments.
The distinction is clear by context though and a similar case could be made about the light launcher (plastic/MFB versions) I do not see this as a reason to choose one name over another.
And, just to make things clear, I am not advocating the use of Hasbro names over Takara ones without reason either. In my view, such a decision should be made on a case by case basis.