So I got in to argument with some friends who are claiming that TT knows what they're doing when classifying parts...
They sent me this from the following from the wiki to prove that At is a defense type:
"In theory, the wider tip would increase a Beyblade's Knock-Out Defense by having greater surface area and friction. However, in practice, the free-rotating nature of the ball reduces most of the Knock-Out Defense given by the surface area of the ball. Like all other ball-based Performance Tips, the tabs around Atomic are meant to act as brakes against Knock-Outs at the cost of Stamina by striking against the stadium floor. However, the larger diameter makes such contact rare.
I tried to explain that this points to it being a stamina type but my words are falling on deaf ears...
So wbo, is Atomic not the best driver for same spin stamina? Does it not have a decent risk to be ko'ed, especially when hard launched?
Is it a defense type or stamina type part?
They sent me this from the following from the wiki to prove that At is a defense type:
"In theory, the wider tip would increase a Beyblade's Knock-Out Defense by having greater surface area and friction. However, in practice, the free-rotating nature of the ball reduces most of the Knock-Out Defense given by the surface area of the ball. Like all other ball-based Performance Tips, the tabs around Atomic are meant to act as brakes against Knock-Outs at the cost of Stamina by striking against the stadium floor. However, the larger diameter makes such contact rare.
I tried to explain that this points to it being a stamina type but my words are falling on deaf ears...
So wbo, is Atomic not the best driver for same spin stamina? Does it not have a decent risk to be ko'ed, especially when hard launched?
Is it a defense type or stamina type part?