I have a question: Can the old Beyblades compete with the new generation of Beyblades today? In other words, can the original Beyblade designs hold their own against the newer ones?
[Unanswered] Old gen vs new gen
It is not recommended that you battle beyblades from different generations as they were not designed to battle each other and it can increase break risk. Its especially risky to battle plastic generations (BSB, and Burst) against metal generations (MFB and X).
Ah ok but what if you have the blade that compatible?
plastic generation, metal fight/fusion/fury, and burst beys are incompatible with X, and may be severely damaged by battling against X
Do you mean the x-over beys cuz they are compatible
X beys against last season of beyblade burst and metal fusion is a kinda compatible and many people may not agree with me and i dont argue. But it all depends on the stadium, if you use the xtreme stadium is obviousky incompatible but if itsnon a beyblade burts stadium or metal fusion stadium its fully compatible with all generations since knockout finish happens often
(Jul. 04, 2026 3:55 PM)Ekusu_10 Wrote: X beys against last season of beyblade burst and metal fusion is a kinda compatible and many people may not agree with me and i dont argue. But it all depends on the stadium, if you use the xtreme stadium is obviousky incompatible but if itsnon a beyblade burts stadium or metal fusion stadium its fully compatible with all generations since knockout finish happens often
I believe we are referring to the beys. and I suppose it's possible to battle metal fight beys against X beys, but late burst beys' gimmicks would be very delicate in face of the practical buzzsaw in comparison that is an X bey.
That’s exactly my point.
How is it that the original generation—the ones who literally built the foundation of Beyblade—can’t compete with the newer generation? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Almost every competitive activity in the world allows different generations to compete under the same rules. In sports, athletes from different eras continue to compete as long as they meet the current regulations. The Olympics has existed for well over a century, and every generation competes on the same stage. Professional sports don’t create an entirely separate game every time new equipment is introduced—they evolve while still allowing athletes to compete together.
Even outside of sports, look at Pokémon. Trading cards from the 1990s are still celebrated, collected, and in some formats can still be played alongside modern cards. The history of the franchise remains connected instead of being left behind.
So why should Beyblade be different?
If the concern is that the newer Beyblades are too powerful or mechanically different, then create official divisions, weight classes, or standardized formats—just like countless other competitive activities do. That’s a problem that can be solved with rules, not a reason to separate generations forever.
The original generation deserves the opportunity to battle the new generation. Not only would it honor the history of Beyblade, but it would also create incredible matchups that longtime fans have wanted to see for years. Instead of dividing the community, it would unite fans across every era of the franchise.
If Beyblade is truly about discovering the strongest blader and the strongest Beyblade, then every generation should at least have the opportunity to compete under a fair, balanced ruleset.
I have blades from original generation and would like to actually use it in thr community but I feel x out because I see no one allowing it but also don’t see that you can’t !!!
How is it that the original generation—the ones who literally built the foundation of Beyblade—can’t compete with the newer generation? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Almost every competitive activity in the world allows different generations to compete under the same rules. In sports, athletes from different eras continue to compete as long as they meet the current regulations. The Olympics has existed for well over a century, and every generation competes on the same stage. Professional sports don’t create an entirely separate game every time new equipment is introduced—they evolve while still allowing athletes to compete together.
Even outside of sports, look at Pokémon. Trading cards from the 1990s are still celebrated, collected, and in some formats can still be played alongside modern cards. The history of the franchise remains connected instead of being left behind.
So why should Beyblade be different?
If the concern is that the newer Beyblades are too powerful or mechanically different, then create official divisions, weight classes, or standardized formats—just like countless other competitive activities do. That’s a problem that can be solved with rules, not a reason to separate generations forever.
The original generation deserves the opportunity to battle the new generation. Not only would it honor the history of Beyblade, but it would also create incredible matchups that longtime fans have wanted to see for years. Instead of dividing the community, it would unite fans across every era of the franchise.
If Beyblade is truly about discovering the strongest blader and the strongest Beyblade, then every generation should at least have the opportunity to compete under a fair, balanced ruleset.
I have blades from original generation and would like to actually use it in thr community but I feel x out because I see no one allowing it but also don’t see that you can’t !!!
(Jul. 08, 2026 6:37 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: That’s exactly my point.I completely agree and disagree if im being honest, no offense. Takara tomy is also involved in beyblade lore/story, so basically they would want a fresh start after every generation to keep kids hook.
How is it that the original generation—the ones who literally built the foundation of Beyblade—can’t compete with the newer generation? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Almost every competitive activity in the world allows different generations to compete under the same rules. In sports, athletes from different eras continue to compete as long as they meet the current regulations. The Olympics has existed for well over a century, and every generation competes on the same stage. Professional sports don’t create an entirely separate game every time new equipment is introduced—they evolve while still allowing athletes to compete together.
Even outside of sports, look at Pokémon. Trading cards from the 1990s are still celebrated, collected, and in some formats can still be played alongside modern cards. The history of the franchise remains connected instead of being left behind.
So why should Beyblade be different?
If the concern is that the newer Beyblades are too powerful or mechanically different, then create official divisions, weight classes, or standardized formats—just like countless other competitive activities do. That’s a problem that can be solved with rules, not a reason to separate generations forever.
The original generation deserves the opportunity to battle the new generation. Not only would it honor the history of Beyblade, but it would also create incredible matchups that longtime fans have wanted to see for years. Instead of dividing the community, it would unite fans across every era of the franchise.
If Beyblade is truly about discovering the strongest blader and the strongest Beyblade, then every generation should at least have the opportunity to compete under a fair, balanced ruleset.
I have blades from original generation and would like to actually use it in thr community but I feel x out because I see no one allowing it but also don’t see that you can’t !!!
Another reason is that, as i said earlier, for kids. If we mix generations, basically kids will easily get beaten and will lose interest by an adult who have a full collection of strong beys from old generation. To make it fair takara tomy and author of every beyblade generation would have to make new story and new beyblade so kids could have a chance to win against scalpers/adults and also get the andrenaline of hype and excitement.
Also, i completely disagree with pokemon argument, no hard feelings here. Pokemon cards are basically just cardboard with texts, and also being judge of rarity by how many they are manufacture and copied for several packs. With only 5-10% of people in pokemon communities playing the actual game of cards but 90%+ are just collectors and scalpers.
Last paragraph, older generations may not be compatible with newer generation. You take plastic generation to beat metal fusion, metal fusion wins because of raw weight advantages and more logical shape. And if we take metal fusion to beat earlier seasons of beyblade burst, metal fusion win but if against... probabpy last 3 seasons of beyblade burst metal fusion might lose. And take beyblade burst against beyblade x. Beyblade x may win because of the stadium mechanic and how fast they are.
Also im fine if anyone corrects me. I may say random things out of my mind when im tryna argue so im good.
I appreciate your perspective, and I actually agree with some of what you’re saying. You’re right that each generation is designed to bring in a new audience and keep the brand fresh. That’s smart from a marketing standpoint.
Where I disagree is the conclusion that this means generations can’t coexist.
Every long-running competitive hobby or sport evolves. Rule sets change, equipment improves, and technology advances—but organizations create divisions, formats, and regulations to keep competition fair instead of separating entire eras forever.
Regarding kids competing against adults, that’s already solved in almost every competitive activity. Chess has age divisions. Pokémon has Junior, Senior, and Masters divisions. Many sports have youth, amateur, and open divisions. The solution isn’t to isolate generations—it’s to organize competition properly.
As for Pokémon, my point wasn’t about the cardboard itself. It was about the longevity of the franchise. A game that’s been around for nearly 30 years still acknowledges and supports its history through formats, reprints, expanded play, and collector value. Older products remain part of the identity of the franchise instead of being treated as if they no longer exist.
I also agree that a Plastic Gen Bey won’t realistically beat a Metal Fight Bey, and a Metal Fight Bey probably wouldn’t consistently beat modern Beyblade X due to differences in weight, design philosophy, and the Xtreme Dash rail. But that doesn’t prove mixed-generation competition is impossible—it only proves that an unrestricted format wouldn’t be balanced.
Every competitive game faces balance issues. That’s why rules exist.
* Weight classes could be introduced.
* Stadium-specific divisions could exist.
* Era-based point systems or performance limits could be tested.
* Separate “Open Format” tournaments could exist alongside current-generation tournaments.
Beyblade has always evolved through engineering. Engineering challenges are solved with engineering solutions—not by saying it can’t be done.
Ultimately, I don’t think anyone is asking Takara Tomy to stop creating new generations. New generations should absolutely continue. The question is simply: why not also create an official format where the history of Beyblade can compete together under balanced rules?
If the community can design competitive ban lists, deck formats, and tournament rules in countless other games, I don’t see why Beyblade couldn’t innovate in the same way.
To me, preserving the legacy of every generation while continuing to innovate would strengthen the franchise, not weaken it. It gives longtime fans a reason to stay invested while still welcoming new players.
I’m Based in Hollywood and would like to find a community to be apart of without feel x out for not having the current version in old school and truly enjoy my generation and things it’s compatible especially with upgrades…. Old generation csn also switch parts and enhance material too
If every generation before Beyblade X is automatically disqualified because they can’t use the X Dash rail, then are we really finding the strongest Beyblade… or just the strongest Beyblade built specifically for one stadium?
Every generation was designed around its own mechanics.
Plastic Gen had Engine Gears, Magnets, HMS.
Metal Fight had the Hybrid Wheel System, 4D, Synchrome.
Burst had the Burst mechanic.
X has the X Dash.
Innovation has always been part of Beyblade.
But innovation has never meant the generations before it suddenly became “invalid.”
The Beyblade community is the only competitive community I can think of where an entire 25-year history has essentially been excluded instead of asking, “How can we create a balanced format where they can all compete?”
Sports evolve. Technology evolves. Rules evolve. Yet organizations find ways to celebrate both the past and the present.
So why can’t Beyblade?
Can we design a fair ruleset that allows every generation to prove its strengths
Where I disagree is the conclusion that this means generations can’t coexist.
Every long-running competitive hobby or sport evolves. Rule sets change, equipment improves, and technology advances—but organizations create divisions, formats, and regulations to keep competition fair instead of separating entire eras forever.
Regarding kids competing against adults, that’s already solved in almost every competitive activity. Chess has age divisions. Pokémon has Junior, Senior, and Masters divisions. Many sports have youth, amateur, and open divisions. The solution isn’t to isolate generations—it’s to organize competition properly.
As for Pokémon, my point wasn’t about the cardboard itself. It was about the longevity of the franchise. A game that’s been around for nearly 30 years still acknowledges and supports its history through formats, reprints, expanded play, and collector value. Older products remain part of the identity of the franchise instead of being treated as if they no longer exist.
I also agree that a Plastic Gen Bey won’t realistically beat a Metal Fight Bey, and a Metal Fight Bey probably wouldn’t consistently beat modern Beyblade X due to differences in weight, design philosophy, and the Xtreme Dash rail. But that doesn’t prove mixed-generation competition is impossible—it only proves that an unrestricted format wouldn’t be balanced.
Every competitive game faces balance issues. That’s why rules exist.
* Weight classes could be introduced.
* Stadium-specific divisions could exist.
* Era-based point systems or performance limits could be tested.
* Separate “Open Format” tournaments could exist alongside current-generation tournaments.
Beyblade has always evolved through engineering. Engineering challenges are solved with engineering solutions—not by saying it can’t be done.
Ultimately, I don’t think anyone is asking Takara Tomy to stop creating new generations. New generations should absolutely continue. The question is simply: why not also create an official format where the history of Beyblade can compete together under balanced rules?
If the community can design competitive ban lists, deck formats, and tournament rules in countless other games, I don’t see why Beyblade couldn’t innovate in the same way.
To me, preserving the legacy of every generation while continuing to innovate would strengthen the franchise, not weaken it. It gives longtime fans a reason to stay invested while still welcoming new players.
I’m Based in Hollywood and would like to find a community to be apart of without feel x out for not having the current version in old school and truly enjoy my generation and things it’s compatible especially with upgrades…. Old generation csn also switch parts and enhance material too
If every generation before Beyblade X is automatically disqualified because they can’t use the X Dash rail, then are we really finding the strongest Beyblade… or just the strongest Beyblade built specifically for one stadium?
Every generation was designed around its own mechanics.
Plastic Gen had Engine Gears, Magnets, HMS.
Metal Fight had the Hybrid Wheel System, 4D, Synchrome.
Burst had the Burst mechanic.
X has the X Dash.
Innovation has always been part of Beyblade.
But innovation has never meant the generations before it suddenly became “invalid.”
The Beyblade community is the only competitive community I can think of where an entire 25-year history has essentially been excluded instead of asking, “How can we create a balanced format where they can all compete?”
Sports evolve. Technology evolves. Rules evolve. Yet organizations find ways to celebrate both the past and the present.
So why can’t Beyblade?
Can we design a fair ruleset that allows every generation to prove its strengths
(Jul. 08, 2026 6:37 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: That’s exactly my point.
How is it that the original generation—the ones who literally built the foundation of Beyblade—can’t compete with the newer generation? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Almost every competitive activity in the world allows different generations to compete under the same rules. In sports, athletes from different eras continue to compete as long as they meet the current regulations. The Olympics has existed for well over a century, and every generation competes on the same stage. Professional sports don’t create an entirely separate game every time new equipment is introduced—they evolve while still allowing athletes to compete together.
Even outside of sports, look at Pokémon. Trading cards from the 1990s are still celebrated, collected, and in some formats can still be played alongside modern cards. The history of the franchise remains connected instead of being left behind.
So why should Beyblade be different?
If the concern is that the newer Beyblades are too powerful or mechanically different, then create official divisions, weight classes, or standardized formats—just like countless other competitive activities do. That’s a problem that can be solved with rules, not a reason to separate generations forever.
The original generation deserves the opportunity to battle the new generation. Not only would it honor the history of Beyblade, but it would also create incredible matchups that longtime fans have wanted to see for years. Instead of dividing the community, it would unite fans across every era of the franchise.
If Beyblade is truly about discovering the strongest blader and the strongest Beyblade, then every generation should at least have the opportunity to compete under a fair, balanced ruleset.
I have blades from original generation and would like to actually use it in thr community but I feel x out because I see no one allowing it but also don’t see that you can’t !!!
for one, if you try beating a modern pokemon deck with base set cards, you will fail. the power creep in Pokemon is monolithic. for two, you can PLAY with plastic gen still, you just can't use it against the faster, more durable, sharper X beys, because a 30-year-old thin plastic spinning top versus a couple-year-old extra-fast metal spinning top is going to end with one of them breaking. there is no way that a plastic bey could beat an X bey anyway, because X is significantly stronger. Its launchers spin it faster, and. of course, the X dash. there are a few plastic gen tournaments, just not plastic versus X tournaments. Why would anyone go to a tournament against x beys with a collectors item that is a plastic gen bey just to break it?
as for preserving the legacy, many previous-generation beys get remade into X beys with near-identical designs. Unfortunately, said beys are weaker because to make them look similar it would require less metal and more plastic.
(Jul. 03, 2026 10:59 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: I have a question: Can the old Beyblades compete with the new generation of Beyblades today? In other words, can the original Beyblade designs hold their own against the newer ones?
(Jul. 08, 2026 7:04 PM)Infinityblader1 Wrote:(Jul. 08, 2026 6:37 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: That’s exactly my point.
How is it that the original generation—the ones who literally built the foundation of Beyblade—can’t compete with the newer generation? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Almost every competitive activity in the world allows different generations to compete under the same rules. In sports, athletes from different eras continue to compete as long as they meet the current regulations. The Olympics has existed for well over a century, and every generation competes on the same stage. Professional sports don’t create an entirely separate game every time new equipment is introduced—they evolve while still allowing athletes to compete together.
Even outside of sports, look at Pokémon. Trading cards from the 1990s are still celebrated, collected, and in some formats can still be played alongside modern cards. The history of the franchise remains connected instead of being left behind.
So why should Beyblade be different?
If the concern is that the newer Beyblades are too powerful or mechanically different, then create official divisions, weight classes, or standardized formats—just like countless other competitive activities do. That’s a problem that can be solved with rules, not a reason to separate generations forever.
The original generation deserves the opportunity to battle the new generation. Not only would it honor the history of Beyblade, but it would also create incredible matchups that longtime fans have wanted to see for years. Instead of dividing the community, it would unite fans across every era of the franchise.
If Beyblade is truly about discovering the strongest blader and the strongest Beyblade, then every generation should at least have the opportunity to compete under a fair, balanced ruleset.
I have blades from original generation and would like to actually use it in thr community but I feel x out because I see no one allowing it but also don’t see that you can’t !!!
for one, if you try beating a modern pokemon deck with base set cards, you will fail. the power creep in Pokemon is monolithic. for two, you can PLAY with plastic gen still, you just can't use it against the faster, more durable, sharper X beys, because a 30-year-old thin plastic spinning top versus a couple-year-old extra-fast metal spinning top is going to end with one of them breaking. there is no way that a plastic bey could beat an X bey anyway, because X is significantly stronger. Its launchers spin it faster, and. of course, the X dash. there are a few plastic gen tournaments, just not plastic versus X tournaments. Why would anyone go to a tournament against x beys with a collectors item that is a plastic gen bey just to break it?
as for preserving the legacy, many previous-generation beys get remade into X beys with near-identical designs. Unfortunately, said beys are weaker because to make them look similar it would require less metal and more plastic.
I actually agree with some of what you’re saying. An original 1999 plastic Bey isn’t likely to consistently compete with modern X Beys in its stock form. That’s a fair point.
But here’s where I think we’re looking at it differently. You’re speaking mostly from theory, while I’m speaking from practical experimentation. I’ve actually been testing this, and that’s the whole reason I raised the discussion in the first place.
We also have remakes and redesigned versions of the original Beys made with stronger materials and improved construction. They preserve the classic identity while making them far more capable of handling modern battles. So it isn’t just “30-year-old plastic vs. Beyblade X.”
My argument has never been that every old Bey should dominate Beyblade X. My point is that they deserve the opportunity to compete under the right conditions. Every competitive hobby evolves, yet many still find ways to let different generations coexist. Beyblade is built around customization, strategy, launch technique, weight distribution, balance, and stamina—not just raw speed.
I completely understand your concern about collectors not wanting to risk rare originals, and I agree. Nobody is suggesting people should destroy valuable vintage Beys. But that doesn’t mean the concept itself is impossible. There are reproductions, remakes, and modernized versions that can fill that role.
Maybe I’m the anomaly here, but I’m willing to represent the ‘99 era respectfully in battle and put my theory to the test instead of assuming the outcome. If I lose, I lose. If I win a few, that proves there’s more to the conversation than simply saying “old can’t compete.” I just want the original generation to still be part of the game with a different approach—and I think that’s worth exploring.
(Jul. 08, 2026 10:53 PM)Uncletyson Wrote: My argument has never been that every old Bey should dominate Beyblade X. My point is that they deserve the opportunity to compete under the right conditions. Every competitive hobby evolves, yet many still find ways to let different generations coexist. Beyblade is built around customization, strategy, launch technique, weight distribution, balance, and stamina—not just raw speed.
I completely understand your concern about collectors not wanting to risk rare originals, and I agree. Nobody is suggesting people should destroy valuable vintage Beys. But that doesn’t mean the concept itself is impossible. There are reproductions, remakes, and modernized versions that can fill that role.[/font][/size]
Maybe I’m the anomaly here, but I’m willing to represent the ‘99 era respectfully in battle and put my theory to the test instead of assuming the outcome. If I lose, I lose. If I win a few, that proves there’s more to the conversation than simply saying “old can’t compete.” I just want the original generation to still be part of the game with a different approach—and I think that’s worth exploring.
Are you saying you made from-scratch beys? because beys designed by non-takara Tomy or Hasbro parties are impossible to balance, and are also illegal for tournaments. Same for reproductions, with materials and imperfections being variable. As for your point about launch technique, weight distribution, etc, X beys after have better weight distribution, example: Wizard Rod, better launch technique usage, Example, drop launch and reverse X.
Official tournaments by Takara Tomy never use cross-generation. TT and Hasbro never designed these beys for cross-generation compatibility, and so it's risky to do so.
(Jul. 08, 2026 11:01 PM)Infinityblader1 Wrote:(Jul. 08, 2026 10:53 PM)Uncletyson Wrote: My argument has never been that every old Bey should dominate Beyblade X. My point is that they deserve the opportunity to compete under the right conditions. Every competitive hobby evolves, yet many still find ways to let different generations coexist. Beyblade is built around customization, strategy, launch technique, weight distribution, balance, and stamina—not just raw speed.
I completely understand your concern about collectors not wanting to risk rare originals, and I agree. Nobody is suggesting people should destroy valuable vintage Beys. But that doesn’t mean the concept itself is impossible. There are reproductions, remakes, and modernized versions that can fill that role.[/font][/size]
Maybe I’m the anomaly here, but I’m willing to represent the ‘99 era respectfully in battle and put my theory to the test instead of assuming the outcome. If I lose, I lose. If I win a few, that proves there’s more to the conversation than simply saying “old can’t compete.” I just want the original generation to still be part of the game with a different approach—and I think that’s worth exploring.
Are you saying you made from-scratch beys? because beys designed by non-takara Tomy or Hasbro parties are impossible to balance, and are also illegal for tournaments. Same for reproductions, with materials and imperfections being variable. As for your point about launch technique, weight distribution, etc, X beys after have better weight distribution, example: Wizard Rod, better launch technique usage, Example, drop launch and reverse X.
Official tournaments by Takara Tomy never use cross-generation. TT and Hasbro never designed these beys for cross-generation compatibility, and so it's risky to do so.
I think we’re mixing up tournament legality with mechanical possibility. I completely understand that official Takara Tomy tournaments don’t allow cross-generation battles or homemade parts—that’s a ruleset, not evidence that something physically can’t compete.
Also, there are people who have literally designed and built their own Beys and successfully battled with them. That alone shows the performance of a Bey is determined by engineering, weight distribution, balance, contact points, and launch technique—not simply by the year it was released. Community testing with custom and 3D-printed Beys has shown that design changes can absolutely influence competitive performance, even if they’re not tournament legal.
My argument has never been that a ‘99 Bey is automatically better than Beyblade X. In fact, I’ve acknowledged that X has advantages in weight distribution and the Xtreme Line. My point is that those advantages don’t automatically prove an older Bey cannot compete.
The only honest way to settle that question is through controlled testing—not assumptions. If original Beys lose every battle, then the evidence speaks for itself. But if they win some, force stamina battles, or perform competitively in certain matchups, then we’ve learned something that theory alone couldn’t tell us.
Science and competition have always worked the same way: you test a hypothesis—you don’t declare the outcome before the experiment.
Also here is a beyblade x being 3d printed and used to compete
Very respected person I love his content
https://youtu.be/9Nm-G2CjS-E?is=tPDKG5YuKoRoPy3s
(Jul. 09, 2026 5:36 AM)Uncletyson Wrote:(Jul. 08, 2026 11:01 PM)Infinityblader1 Wrote: Are you saying you made from-scratch beys? because beys designed by non-takara Tomy or Hasbro parties are impossible to balance, and are also illegal for tournaments. Same for reproductions, with materials and imperfections being variable. As for your point about launch technique, weight distribution, etc, X beys after have better weight distribution, example: Wizard Rod, better launch technique usage, Example, drop launch and reverse X.
Official tournaments by Takara Tomy never use cross-generation. TT and Hasbro never designed these beys for cross-generation compatibility, and so it's risky to do so.
I think we’re mixing up tournament legality with mechanical possibility. I completely understand that official Takara Tomy tournaments don’t allow cross-generation battles or homemade parts—that’s a ruleset, not evidence that something physically can’t compete.
Also, there are people who have literally designed and built their own Beys and successfully battled with them. That alone shows the performance of a Bey is determined by engineering, weight distribution, balance, contact points, and launch technique—not simply by the year it was released. Community testing with custom and 3D-printed Beys has shown that design changes can absolutely influence competitive performance, even if they’re not tournament legal.
My argument has never been that a ‘99 Bey is automatically better than Beyblade X. In fact, I’ve acknowledged that X has advantages in weight distribution and the Xtreme Line. My point is that those advantages don’t automatically prove an older Bey cannot compete.
The only honest way to settle that question is through controlled testing—not assumptions. If original Beys lose every battle, then the evidence speaks for itself. But if they win some, force stamina battles, or perform competitively in certain matchups, then we’ve learned something that theory alone couldn’t tell us.
Science and competition have always worked the same way: you test a hypothesis—you don’t declare the outcome before the experiment.
Also here is a beyblade x being 3d printed and used to compete
Very respected person I love his content
https://youtu.be/9Nm-G2CjS-E?is=tPDKG5YuKoRoPy3s
Damn your font randomly changes, but sorry for out of context. I just wanna say that i get your perspective, i never test mixed generations battles but im just saying a theory/fact that i understand. Which is mainly weight, blade shape/design and the original goal of the generations. Appreciate it
(Jul. 09, 2026 5:36 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: I think we’re mixing up tournament legality with mechanical possibility. I completely understand that official Takara Tomy tournaments don’t allow cross-generation battles or homemade parts—that’s a ruleset, not evidence that something physically can’t compete.
Also, there are people who have literally designed and built their own Beys and successfully battled with them. That alone shows the performance of a Bey is determined by engineering, weight distribution, balance, contact points, and launch technique—not simply by the year it was released. Community testing with custom and 3D-printed Beys has shown that design changes can absolutely influence competitive performance, even if they’re not tournament legal.
My argument has never been that a ‘99 Bey is automatically better than Beyblade X. In fact, I’ve acknowledged that X has advantages in weight distribution and the Xtreme Line. My point is that those advantages don’t automatically prove an older Bey cannot compete.
The only honest way to settle that question is through controlled testing—not assumptions. If original Beys lose every battle, then the evidence speaks for itself. But if they win some, force stamina battles, or perform competitively in certain matchups, then we’ve learned something that theory alone couldn’t tell us.
Science and competition have always worked the same way: you test a hypothesis—you don’t declare the outcome before the experiment.
Also here is a beyblade x being 3d printed and used to compete
Very respected person I love his content
https://youtu.be/9Nm-G2CjS-E?is=tPDKG5YuKoRoPy3s
I know that custom beys CAN compete. I'm saying that's they often land on the overpowered side of the spectrum, and that's why they aren't;t allowed. With official beys, it's easy to tell how powerful it is due to many people documenting its power. If anyone could show up with a custom bey at a tournament, it would be anarchy. Power creep beyond comprehension.
As for your main argument, how about you get an X bey like Wand Wizard or Dran Buster and try it against a 1999 bey yourself? After all, it's you who wants this. It should be you who's testing it at first.
Yeah let's just say you can say goodbye to your plastic gen if you have if you battle against x or metal
(Jul. 09, 2026 2:43 PM)Infinityblader1 Wrote:Ok I will…. I would like to have a friendly battle with you one day. Thank you for a great conversation about this topic. I respect you for sharing your knowledge…(Jul. 09, 2026 5:36 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: I think we’re mixing up tournament legality with mechanical possibility. I completely understand that official Takara Tomy tournaments don’t allow cross-generation battles or homemade parts—that’s a ruleset, not evidence that something physically can’t compete.
Also, there are people who have literally designed and built their own Beys and successfully battled with them. That alone shows the performance of a Bey is determined by engineering, weight distribution, balance, contact points, and launch technique—not simply by the year it was released. Community testing with custom and 3D-printed Beys has shown that design changes can absolutely influence competitive performance, even if they’re not tournament legal.
My argument has never been that a ‘99 Bey is automatically better than Beyblade X. In fact, I’ve acknowledged that X has advantages in weight distribution and the Xtreme Line. My point is that those advantages don’t automatically prove an older Bey cannot compete.
The only honest way to settle that question is through controlled testing—not assumptions. If original Beys lose every battle, then the evidence speaks for itself. But if they win some, force stamina battles, or perform competitively in certain matchups, then we’ve learned something that theory alone couldn’t tell us.
Science and competition have always worked the same way: you test a hypothesis—you don’t declare the outcome before the experiment.
Also here is a beyblade x being 3d printed and used to compete
Very respected person I love his content
https://youtu.be/9Nm-G2CjS-E?is=tPDKG5YuKoRoPy3s
I know that custom beys CAN compete. I'm saying that's they often land on the overpowered side of the spectrum, and that's why they aren't;t allowed. With official beys, it's easy to tell how powerful it is due to many people documenting its power. If anyone could show up with a custom bey at a tournament, it would be anarchy. Power creep beyond comprehension.
As for your main argument, how about you get an X bey like Wand Wizard or Dran Buster and try it against a 1999 bey yourself? After all, it's you who wants this. It should be you who's testing it at first.
(Jul. 09, 2026 10:42 PM)MaskX Wrote: Yeah let's just say you can say goodbye to your plastic gen if you have if you battle against x or metal
i
I accept your challenge sir…. I hope we cross paths soon 😊….. i travel the states so let me know where you at and we can battle
Well... to make one series of something over a 27 year old franchise, isn't practical. Imagine Takara Tomy just kept making storm dragoon for over 20 years, yeah Not Practical
Imagine phantom Orion vs rhino horn
(Jul. 03, 2026 10:59 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: I have a question: Can the old Beyblades compete with the new generation of Beyblades today? In other words, can the original Beyblade designs hold their own against the newer ones?
Any bey can compete with any other one. The issue is the older parts degrading over time. Even with things new in box so unless Takara/Hasbro plans on releasing fully new old beys, we won't know but testing should still bear out similar results if anything.
I remember back in the BeyDamashi/OTC days, there were many tests of HMS v Past and things were pretty even except for the top HMS combos.
Technically, HMS and Plastic generation beys were intended to be battled with one another. They are the same generation as far as TT is concerned.
But, battling MFB v Plastic or even Burst v Plastic, hell, even X v Burst, is highly inadvisable, because as the beys get closer to the modern releases, a lot of the time the launchers are much more powerful so the competition isnt even fair. Let alone the immense break risk you introduce by pitting metal contact against plastic contact.
Even X v MFB is ill advised. X launchers are incredibly stronger than MFB ones, and, generally, X shapes are a lot more aggressive.
While it is physically possible to battle cross generation, it is very incredibly, not a good idea.
But, battling MFB v Plastic or even Burst v Plastic, hell, even X v Burst, is highly inadvisable, because as the beys get closer to the modern releases, a lot of the time the launchers are much more powerful so the competition isnt even fair. Let alone the immense break risk you introduce by pitting metal contact against plastic contact.
Even X v MFB is ill advised. X launchers are incredibly stronger than MFB ones, and, generally, X shapes are a lot more aggressive.
While it is physically possible to battle cross generation, it is very incredibly, not a good idea.
😂 Haha, I actually agree with you to a point. But just as Metal Fight and X have upgrades and customization options, the OG generation has evolved too. There are upgraded remakes, stronger materials, and performance parts that significantly improve what those blades are capable of.
I genuinely believe I could compete with my setup. I don’t think it’s fair to rule out the original generation simply because of the material it was originally made from. Performance isn’t determined by material alone—it’s also about design, tuning, customization, launch technique, and strategy.
I’m more than happy to be the anomaly and put that theory to the test, even if it’s just for fun. Who knows? It might open up a whole new format for the community.
And at the end of the day… can you really say you’ve beaten the best if you’ve never had to beat them all? 😉🔥
I genuinely believe I could compete with my setup. I don’t think it’s fair to rule out the original generation simply because of the material it was originally made from. Performance isn’t determined by material alone—it’s also about design, tuning, customization, launch technique, and strategy.
I’m more than happy to be the anomaly and put that theory to the test, even if it’s just for fun. Who knows? It might open up a whole new format for the community.
And at the end of the day… can you really say you’ve beaten the best if you’ve never had to beat them all? 😉🔥
(Jul. 28, 2026 5:34 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: 😂 Haha, I actually agree with you to a point. But just as Metal Fight and X have upgrades and customization options, the OG generation has evolved too. There are upgraded remakes, stronger materials, and performance parts that significantly improve what those blades are capable of.
I genuinely believe I could compete with my setup. I don’t think it’s fair to rule out the original generation simply because of the material it was originally made from. Performance isn’t determined by material alone—it’s also about design, tuning, customization, launch technique, and strategy.
I’m more than happy to be the anomaly and put that theory to the test, even if it’s just for fun. Who knows? It might open up a whole new format for the community.
And at the end of the day… can you really say you’ve beaten the best if you’ve never had to beat them all? 😉🔥
That's the thing, people say they're the #1 beyblade X player, or #1 BURST. They say they've beaten the best X bladers, or metal fight. Honestly, I cannot see why you're clinging to this idea. What exactly do you mean, upgraded remakes and stronger materials? If they aren't official, they aren't allowed. If you have any X beys, I suggest you battle them against one another yourself. And you should record evidence as well. And make sure it's a stronger X bey like Shark Scale, or even Dran Buster, to test just how easily an X bey could damage a plastic gen bey.
(Jul. 28, 2026 5:34 AM)Uncletyson Wrote: 😂 Haha, I actually agree with you to a point. But just as Metal Fight and X have upgrades and customization options, the OG generation has evolved too. There are upgraded remakes, stronger materials, and performance parts that significantly improve what those blades are capable of.
I genuinely believe I could compete with my setup. I don’t think it’s fair to rule out the original generation simply because of the material it was originally made from. Performance isn’t determined by material alone—it’s also about design, tuning, customization, launch technique, and strategy.
I’m more than happy to be the anomaly and put that theory to the test, even if it’s just for fun. Who knows? It might open up a whole new format for the community.
And at the end of the day… can you really say you’ve beaten the best if you’ve never had to beat them all? 😉🔥
What you are implying here, "stronger materials" would imply that the "original" series beyblades you are using are indeed NOT originals.
Our entire point is that original beys will not survive against new stuff. They literally are not built for it. I have battled original versus modern. They break almost instantly. I really don't recommend doing it.

