(Jan. 25, 2018 5:26 AM)AkiraKei13 Wrote:(Jan. 24, 2018 7:03 PM)MonoDragon Wrote: 0, 7 and 4 do everything. Though the heavier you go, the bigger the Burst risk (if minimal)
So from my own reading and studying after your guidance and to my understanding the most common for competitive are 0/2/4/5/7, with 0/4/7 being the current most used.
5 is a stand in if you don't have a 4.
4 is a alternate for 7 that has lower stamina with 7 being preferred amongst them.
2 is a jack of all trades with any combination with average weight.
0 also fits among them as a balance/attack/stam disk but is heavier than the others.
Is the above correct? I also read that 6/8 weren't viable option competitively for different reasons but couldn't find anything on 1/3 what are the deal with those and why they are or aren't used?
added question, would the weight of the current most used going from heaviest to lightest be 0/7/4/5/2?
6 is way too light due to the holes in the center and the thin protrusions.
8 has too much OWD and increases the self-Burst rate too much
3 we don't know anything about because it hasn't been released yet
1 can be very effective on Attack Types due to how unbalanced it is, though it decreasess Stamina and increases the Burst risk as a trade off. Best to use it with Sieg Xcalibur.
And yes that is correct