I never said anything like that.
In that case though: 'don't compare WB with RF, R2F or LRF please in Attack..'

(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.In that case though: 'don't compare WB with RF, R2F or LRF please in Attack..'
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.In that case though: 'don't compare WB with RF, R2F or LRF please in Attack..'
i never did that.. but WB or SF are better than RF in this case..cause RF = very poor stamina
destabilizing it´s a balance combo combining two types Stamina/Attack Storm have attack.. WB have the stamina and attack i need.. the lower track it´s just perfect to get under the opponent..
the results are that tests.. pure and simple...
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:42 AM)Bluezee Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.In that case though: 'don't compare WB with RF, R2F or LRF please in Attack..'
i never did that.. but WB or SF are better than RF in this case..cause RF = very poor stamina
destabilizing it´s a balance combo combining two types Stamina/Attack Storm have attack.. WB have the stamina and attack i need.. the lower track it´s just perfect to get under the opponent..
the results are that tests.. pure and simple...
Here is what you are not understanding that we are trying to express to you. WB IS NOT AN ATTACK BOTTOM. It may have attack capabilities due to the fact that it gets worn down, but it does not mean in any way, shape or form that it is an attack bottom similar to RF, R2F, CS, WF, F, HF, XF, LF, LRF, or anything in the attack based catagories.
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:42 AM)Red_Eyes_Zombie Wrote: edit: nvm
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:47 AM)Dan Wrote: All the guy is trying to say is that in this case, WB holds some early-onset attack capabilities, for a short time. I think we are going too hard on him.. :[
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:50 AM)Bluezee Wrote: Understandable. My apologies Flame Lion. I just did not want there to be any confusion amongst us.
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:55 AM)Red_Eyes_Zombie Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: i never said WB it´s an attack type bottom..
sorry to be all nit-picky, but you did say exactly that...
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: WB it´s an attack bottom