Ominous Wrote:I wasn't discussing rights, though. I was bringing up intent. To me, it seems like the civil union is the 'secular marriage' - the 'Christmas for non-Christians', if you will. If you get the same benefits as a ceremonious marriage, and can pull off the same shindig, does it really matter to you?
I just thought I'd throw in my opinion here as I completely agree with Roan.
The whole aspect of the difference between a civil union and an official marriage ceremony is not entirely the point. It's the fact that there has to be a difference in the first place: this is what, I can only assume, gay people find so debilitative and so discouraging - the fact that they are not allowed to be a part of the exclusive (because that is what it is) club of married couples.
Ominous Wrote:If you get the same benefits as a ceremonious marriage, and can pull off the same shindig, does it really matter to you?
I'm not gay but I can probably speak for a large number of gay people when I say the answer is yes. Not only do partners bound in a civil union NOT have the same rights as a married couple, it's the principle that matters the most here. Gay people are being offered an alternative. I believe that's what homosexuals find so detrimental - they want to be treated as equals.