https://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-Regardi...ng-Forward
The allegedly "discriminatory" comments highlighted "by a member of the community" were posted publicly in the WBO Discord server and allowed to remain up. Of the many comments highlighted, which specifically were found to be discriminatory?
I concede that some of Marutti's messages strayed too close to politics, so warnings for those offenses would be understandable. However, to instead publicly convict a well-known member of the Beyblade community for disciminatory behavior in the News forum of "the largest online community for bladers and Beyblade fans" when no "racism or discriminatory behavior of any kind" ever took place is libelous and irresponsible.
Can we also expect the same "member of the community," who violated numerous of the community guidelines repeatedly and made verifiably untrue claims against Marutti, to receive even a minimum level of warning for their infractions against the Community Guidelines?
Exaggerated claims like the ones made by the "member of the community" only weaken the case for real instances of discrimination. As another member of the AAPI community, I would appreciate some insight from staff regarding this serious matter and the process by which this decision was reached.
EDIT: For reference, this is a link to a Google Drive folder containing screenshots of the allegations that were made, the screenshots that were provided as evidence for the claims made against Marutti, as well as screenshots of the conversations in which the images of the messages used for evidence against Marutti were taken from without their full context:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1...dkEVQFaQJi
Please reserve your judgment before reviewing all the evidence. If you have not yet reviewed all the material contained within these folders, I respectfully ask that you refrain from participating in this discussion.
The allegedly "discriminatory" comments highlighted "by a member of the community" were posted publicly in the WBO Discord server and allowed to remain up. Of the many comments highlighted, which specifically were found to be discriminatory?
I concede that some of Marutti's messages strayed too close to politics, so warnings for those offenses would be understandable. However, to instead publicly convict a well-known member of the Beyblade community for disciminatory behavior in the News forum of "the largest online community for bladers and Beyblade fans" when no "racism or discriminatory behavior of any kind" ever took place is libelous and irresponsible.
Can we also expect the same "member of the community," who violated numerous of the community guidelines repeatedly and made verifiably untrue claims against Marutti, to receive even a minimum level of warning for their infractions against the Community Guidelines?
Exaggerated claims like the ones made by the "member of the community" only weaken the case for real instances of discrimination. As another member of the AAPI community, I would appreciate some insight from staff regarding this serious matter and the process by which this decision was reached.
EDIT: For reference, this is a link to a Google Drive folder containing screenshots of the allegations that were made, the screenshots that were provided as evidence for the claims made against Marutti, as well as screenshots of the conversations in which the images of the messages used for evidence against Marutti were taken from without their full context:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1...dkEVQFaQJi
Please reserve your judgment before reviewing all the evidence. If you have not yet reviewed all the material contained within these folders, I respectfully ask that you refrain from participating in this discussion.