Yes, it is to give attack types an advantage. They are already at a terrible disadvantage. If we followed that rule EVERY SINGLE test with attack types would get the same result - 0%.

@MFBMM
Not really. Tornado isn't good in general, and using a RF isn't the best thing to use, depending on the stadium

@LT13
He was asking a question. While it was a rather unproductive post, it's not like we hardly ever make progress.

---

How do I still have 17th most posts here...?

Ehh, I'd just like to say that the RFs and stuff aren't really that good in Hasbro stadium...
also going to re-ask for someone to test MLD 100HF, I got 75% vs Earth AD145WD...

---

The meaning of my birth and my death, and this moment of your existence.
An 11-lettered message, a fantasy story, and the 5th horizon.
Ah, could my roman (story) be found there?
- Asa to Yoru "Roman" by Sound Horizon

The reason we consider pockets to be KOs here is not only because of how pointless it would be to test attack types if we followed Hasbro's rule, but also because Hasbro's rules have been inconsistant. There are times where pockets are KOs, and other times where they are not.

I said this once before, that this thread's true purpose is to allow memebers with access only to hasbro stadiums to contribute to the community. In all actuality, this thread is completely disposable, and anything discovered here on his thread basicly amounts to nothing. However, over time this thread developed a secondary purpose, which was to guide Hasbro Bladers in Hasbro tourneys.

A Hasbro meta is frankly an unnecisary but nice thing to have. Standard meta will always take priority, that is just common sense. This threads level of importance is so minimal, it is actualy astonishing how far we have all come as a group of BB-10less fans.

yes, Midnight has minor use here, because of the design of the slopes and its high recoil.

@Hiver: That doesnt really need a retest. MLD and LLD attack type tests generally look that good, because they spin steal and KO effectivly. Any stamina they lose to recoil is regained because of spin equalization.

Interesting list! It's kinda cool seing parts from my favourite time of MFB!

Good luck with it!

Oh yay.

4D metal wheels don't have any mode changes either.

Oh the joy.

---

How do I still have 17th most posts here...?

As bad as the whole situation is Rai, again, let us not discuss it on this thread

Thank you Shabalabadoo

In the attack type tier list you have put gravity destroyer, does that mean uncostomised cus that would be rubbish, maybe gravity destroyer r145/gb145 mf, speaking of mf, why aren't you using it, it's better than f, that's for sure

---

thanks to Blaze12xz for the awesome sig

MF hasnt even been tested yet. How could I add that to the list?

Fixed Gravity Destroyer. Also, I hope you mean Gravity uncustomized is bad as an attack type, and not in general, because last time I checked, everything about Gravity Destroyer AD145 is top tier in terms of stamina and defense.

Where on Earth did you get the idea that Gravity Perseus AD145WD is top tier stamina AND defense?

Sometimes I wonder..

---

How do I still have 17th most posts here...?

Gravity sucks gravity balls on ch120, use d125.

Rai: Sorry, momentary mental lapse. I put defense in my write up, thought i erased it and put stamina. guess i didnt delete it.

Spoiler (Click to View)

Rai:I dont understand your problem with me sometimes, you tend to always question me, yet i have never given you a personal reason to do so

CH120 is incredibly versitile. How is that bad? Cite your claim and ill remove it

I do it to almost every person.. If I see something is wrong I question them. It may seem liek I pick on you, but I don't. Guess I just happen to always find something XD

---

How do I still have 17th most posts here...?

I am glad it is just not personal. I will keep that in mind for the future

leon
Gravity is very low, lower than other wheels, so increasing it to d125 will make it seem normal.

CH120 does have a 145 mode, not just 120. Again, if you can cite test results showing Gravity doing poorly on CH120 (120 height) from any meta, or someone here tests it, then i will remove it.

Done some testing with funny bunny, we swapped blades every 10 launches, will be getting mf soon so, yes, i meant a gravity perseus uncustomised is bad, anyway I was meant to test Earth aquario gb145 cs but didn't realise i had wd on till the end

Gravity Destroyer d125 r2f (right spin) vs Earth aquario gb145 wd
2 wins, both ko 1 draw 17 wins, 1 ko and 16 os

Gravity destroyer d125 r2f (left spin) vs Earth aquario gb145 wd
4 wins, all ko 16 wins, 1ko and 15 os

Though it might no seem so, left sping was a lot better than right spin, the battles were a lot closer, i didn't get time but my aim with this is to see the difference in hf, rf, r2f and f, also mf when i get it, will do testing with cs on earth and will be able to test some lightning combos next, all tests don in max stampede stadium (no craters), do you want me to use earth aquario gb145 cs as a benchmark or do you want me to use twisted, i am open to requests so feel free, sadly i don't have ch120 or r145 which is why i used r145

---

thanks to Blaze12xz for the awesome sig

I can barley make out half of what your post is saying. Proper grammer please...

Also, it is not clear at all which beys were assinged wins and losses...

From what I understand, you were using Earth Aquario GB145CS, and then switched to WD, without restarting the test?

Destroyer's capabilities in each spin will differ from mode to mode. Generaly, counter mode will be bettter for opposite spin battles, as it will spin equalize more. And the normal mode will be better for same spin battles. Because Gravity is not limited to one spin direction like L-Drago beys, spin equalization with Gravity is also not limited to only left spin.

I will add some benchmarks to the OP for stamina/defense testing, that way no one has to aks again and again. While relativley new, benchmarks have proven to be very useful, and it is time we start to use them as well.


EDIT: Forgive the tier lists rather, unattractice appearance for the time being, but I added some decent benchmarkers for stamian and defense. Feel free to suggest changes everyone

Done some testing with funny bunny, we swapped blades every 10 launches, will be getting a MF soon so, yes, I meant a Gravity Perseus uncustomised is bad. Anyways, I was meant to test Earth Aquario GB145CS, but didn't realize I had WD on until the end.

Gravity Destroyer D125 R²F (Right spin) vs Earth Aquario GB145WD
Gravity: 2 Wins (2 KO, 0 OS)
Earth: 18 Wins (1 KO, 17 OS)
1 Draw

Gravity Destroyer D125R²F (Left spin) vs Earth Aquario GB145WD
Gravity: 4 Wins (4 KO, 0 OS)
Earth: 16 Wins (1 KO, 15 OS)

Though it might no seem so, left spin was a lot better than right spin, the battles were a lot closer. I didn't get time but my aim with this is to see the difference in HF, RF, R²F and F, also MF when I get it. I will do testing with CS on Earth and will be able to test some Lightning combos next, all tests done in MXS (No craters) Do you want me to use Earth Aquario GB145CS as a benchmark or do you want me to use Twisted? I am open to requests so feel free, sadly I don't have CH120 or R145 which is why I used R145.

I fixed your whole post.
Look, it's nice that you're doing some actual testing, but if you do post, make it quality.
Your whole post was a run on sentence with commas everywhere, no proper punctuation, and with that being said, unreadable.

Improve the quality of your posts or don't post.

---

How do I still have 17th most posts here...?

To add, the occasional spelling or grammer error is not the end of the world. I make alot of silly mistakes all of the time, haha, but do try and make your posts readable for others. Remember that, especialy when it comes to distributing and sharring information with others. Miscommunication leads to misinformation. Thanks for understanding

I didn't start with cs, i was supposed to test with cs but I forgot to put it on, i am a real idiot sometimes, so all the tests were done with wd. Sorry my computer is broken so i have been posting from my phone, that is why there are so many errors, it wont happen again

---

thanks to Blaze12xz for the awesome sig

Haha, that is alright. These tests were fine. You are not an idiot Thank you for your tests

Hey, I have an idea for an attack combo:
Gravity Destroyer D125SF!

Well, gravity is a lot like rock, right? What makes this better is that gravity is dual spin and is heavier. It also has more attack than rock. Could someone test this?

Test it bro if you wish to prove your point. Unless you do not have the parts, then perhaps I should test it...

For the record, increasing font size only makes your perfectly valid points seemingly invalid.

I will try to get tests for it tomarrow.

But what i am proving is that you need rubber tips, afterwards I was messing around with gravity destroyer d125 f and hf, gravity had nowhere nwar enough speed to do any damage to earth

---

thanks to Blaze12xz for the awesome sig

I was addressing kbuno about the font size, although it is no big deal anyway

Hmm...today I should just try and get some F series testing done. I still have one good RF, and an HF that isnt shot to hell...it is to bad my HF/S broke