He cannot PM you anything anymore.
Now, move along with the discussion back into the realm of reality, please.
Now, move along with the discussion back into the realm of reality, please.
(Mar. 11, 2012 5:42 AM)Galaxy4Stars Wrote:My CH120 broke.(Mar. 11, 2012 2:16 AM)th!nk Wrote: Honestly, we need more comparative tests. The one huge set of comparative tests by Leviath (on page 3) showed D125 to be the best track, but I want to see more.No Ch120 :<?
I just now brought a brand new R2F
MF-H Flash Sagittario CH120R2F Vs. MF-H Duo Aquario BD145CS
FS:20 (20 KO)
DA:0
Flash Winning percentage: 100%
Damn these KO were soooo clean. Hands on Ch120 anyone?
(Mar. 12, 2012 3:15 AM)th!nk Wrote: I have to get Flash first, haha, and the soonest I can buy it is on wednesday, and even then it'll take a while to arrive.
According to Dan, Anti-Attack (let's call it that because it's most effective against Attack, the least common type in every meta), is the way to beat flash.
(Mar. 12, 2012 3:20 AM)GaHooleone Wrote: Well, with these results hopefully Attack will rise in popularity.
Could somebody test Flash against the original MF-H Basalt Horogium R145RF? And also other stuff like MF-H Diablo Kerbecs BD145R2F?
(Mar. 12, 2012 3:23 AM)th!nk Wrote: So, tests I'd like to see:
CH120/D125/S130 Comparatives against whatever people can that won't have them all going 20-0
Generally more height tests: It's hard to put it on the Competitive Combinations list if we don't know what tracks to use, guys. It'd be a huge help
More tests against MF-H Duo Aquario BD145CS/RDF, particularly from people who can weigh their Duo's.
More tests on alternative bottoms like MF and WF (the last one I'm really curious about). XF too perhaps.
ANTI-ATTACK TESTS: MF-H Basalt Horogium R145RF (See Ga's thread on it for details), MF-H Diablo Kerbecs BD145/R145 R2F/RF, MF-H Wing Kerbecs BD145R2F.
(Mar. 12, 2012 6:27 AM)Iceshards Wrote:(Mar. 12, 2012 3:26 AM)th!nk Wrote: I have my doubts about XF, to be honest, because it has no recoil handling capability. WF is the one I'm most interested in, seeing as it's done well on MF, and WF is like MF but slightly better at most things.
LF is good as well for flash
(Mar. 12, 2012 6:39 AM)th!nk Wrote:Lol what? What sock? XD.(Mar. 12, 2012 6:27 AM)Iceshards Wrote:(Mar. 12, 2012 3:26 AM)th!nk Wrote: I have my doubts about XF, to be honest, because it has no recoil handling capability. WF is the one I'm most interested in, seeing as it's done well on MF, and WF is like MF but slightly better at most things.
LF is good as well for flash
LF is "good" for precisely nothing.
Nice sock btw.