Thanks to McFrown going around saying C145 "sucks", I decided to post my testing that I've accumulated over the past couple weeks. When I got Rock Giraffe in, I decided to test the three most used defensive tracks against the best low-attacker I can make: Quetz 90RF.
The RF used is practically new. A little bit of wear, but just enough so it isn't fresh and uncontrollable. Earth is mold 2
MFB attack stadium used. Defensive combos launched first at ~80%
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull R145WB
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull GB145WB
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull C145WB
Against a LOW ATTACKER, C145 still gives me the best results. I haven't extensively tested against a 125 height attacker, or a 145 height attacker, but I assume GB145 takes the cake there.
As many other posters have stated - the different defensive tracks are good in different situations. In my opinion - as the tests back it up - C145 gives the best results against a 90-attacker.
The RF used is practically new. A little bit of wear, but just enough so it isn't fresh and uncontrollable. Earth is mold 2
MFB attack stadium used. Defensive combos launched first at ~80%
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull R145WB
Spoiler (Click to View)
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull GB145WB
Spoiler (Click to View)
Quetz 90RF vs. MF Earth Bull C145WB
Spoiler (Click to View)
Against a LOW ATTACKER, C145 still gives me the best results. I haven't extensively tested against a 125 height attacker, or a 145 height attacker, but I assume GB145 takes the cake there.
As many other posters have stated - the different defensive tracks are good in different situations. In my opinion - as the tests back it up - C145 gives the best results against a 90-attacker.