(Jul. 22, 2010 5:41 AM).:.:Kai:.:. Wrote: (Jul. 22, 2010 5:34 AM)Pockyx3 Wrote: What is this?
I really can't see how you can feel no difference with a Hasbro stadium and a Takara Tomy stadium.
Hasbro stadiums don't let attack types even exist, the pockets can save a beyblade from being knocked out, the slopes and angles are all horrible,The hasbro stadiums have only two "exits", Everything.
Also not to control this forum and/or be a backseat mod but isn't this really off topic?
I don´t think that this can fit here but no in off-topic, some part in Beyblade Discussion and one part here because I´m trying to speak about inflexibility of WBO.
How can you say this? We have not ignored Hasbro's Stadiums on the basis that we are "inflexible". We wanted Hasbro's Stadiums to work, so that a lot more people could play competitively. However, it wasn't to be, as evidenced through
testing.
I think it's ignorant to assume Hasbro and Takara Tomy's Stadiums are the same. Anyone who's used both will agree that Takara Tomy's are superior; there's no debate here (which incidentally, a lot of people have already mentioned).
I suppose this counts as "being strict", but honestly, this way we can maintain a competitive atmosphere here. Would you hold tournaments in a plastic bowl or wok, and feel that it would be valid?
All around you you can see how we encourage competitive play; Faces for placing, Credits for participating, and most of all, the Beypoint System. If we did not take a firm stance on what we will and will not allow, then all of these things would be devalued and ultimately, pointless.