(Aug. 21, 2010 4:38 AM)Mc Frown Wrote: I think overall GB145 is a much safer choice then C145, as it preforms far better in a multitude of situations.
vs. almost any attacker, stamina type, or another defense type, GB145 shows it's superiority.
Cpt. Squirell's results:Look, results vs. a combo with a 90 track with NO TESTING BIAS.Spoiler (Click to View)
If C145 only really shines against Quetz 90RF, that isn't enough reason to ever pick C145 over GB145, unless your opponent walks up to you and says: "Hi. I'm using Quetzalcoatl 90RF".
Kei you have your destabilizer (MF L Drago 90WF), and realize that it preforms much better against C145 than GB145, and that's low (Half of the time the claws do nothing to help avert an impact). GB145 obviously has higher stamina then C145, as it has the ability to precess, heck, I've had attack types outspin defense beys with C145 because they give them a big hit and knock them onto the claws. GB145 also is heavier and obviously preforms better against high attackers (no one disagrees with this).
So, in conclusion, there is almost 0 reason to EVER choose C145.
I could be wrong here, but this is my stance.
EDIT:EDIT:Spoiler (Click to View)(Aug. 21, 2010 3:27 AM)Kai-V Wrote: The problem with this community is a lot of talking, but little testing. Test results are the best arguements to prove a point. And ideally they would be confirmed or infirmed by two or more other people.
Which is exactly what I said, and what Ozzy refuted (among the posts you deleted in the other thread).
Don't be so fickle Ozzy, hah.
Considering it's me vs. everyone I figured it would be fair to let this onto the new page.
tl;dr: GB145 is always a safer option and generally a much better option when it comes to customizing your beyblade.