Ichida Wrote:The new Megaman Star Force isn't any better, either. They've established radio waves as the main plane of existence for battling upon. At least Battle Network was actually over the internet.
What? Does it take place in 1998?
Ichida Wrote:The new Megaman Star Force isn't any better, either. They've established radio waves as the main plane of existence for battling upon. At least Battle Network was actually over the internet.
Quote:The Mega Man franchise takes place in two separate timelines, one where robotic technology flourished and another where network technology prospered instead. The Battle Network series was placed in the network timeline, causing it to be completely disconnected from every other Mega Man series (Classic, X, Zero, ZX, and Legends). Mega Man Star Force explicitly states that it takes place approximately two-hundred years into the future of Battle Network, thus placing it into the network timeline.
Ichida Wrote:You only think that because everyone's so used to the battle games that anything else seems innovative and interesting. Real Pokemon competitors like me are more than satisfied with battle. I don't have time to play a photography video game.
Litrid Wrote:Ichida Wrote:You only think that because everyone's so used to the battle games that anything else seems innovative and interesting. Real Pokemon competitors like me are more than satisfied with battle. I don't have time to play a photography video game.
Hey now Ichida I think that Pokemon Snap is a wonderful game I wish I had that game for my 64. When I rented that game I played it for a long time and tried to get the best pics I could get. I wish they would make a sequel or even a third one with johto, Hoenn, and Sinnoh you know how much money Game Freak would make if they made sequels to Pokemon Snap? Anyways....Pokemon Snap is really about observing pokemon and seeing how they live and stuff and besides the graphics back then were carp awesome =)
(Jul. 11, 2010 9:27 PM)To Wrote: I feel the exact opposite in regards to the 64, it has the ugliest controller of a console I've ever owned, a miniscule library of games (quality or otherwise), and none of the games on the platfrom stand the test of time due to their hideous visuals.
(Jul. 11, 2010 10:44 PM)♥ Wrote:(Jul. 11, 2010 9:27 PM)To Wrote: I feel the exact opposite in regards to the 64, it has the ugliest controller of a console I've ever owned, a miniscule library of games (quality or otherwise), and none of the games on the platfrom stand the test of time due to their hideous visuals.
hahahhadbajhfbakwfafwa
i sincerely doubt there is anyone who appreciates gaming who doesnt think super mario 64 / ocarina of time are one of the best games of all time, regardless of "hideous visuals".
(Jul. 11, 2010 8:44 PM)♥ Wrote: It's probably better to use this thread, actually.
I think Super Mario 64 and Banjo Kazooie/Tooie were two of the best games I've ever played, even to this day. Completely agree that the update Banjo is wrong.