YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
try Metal Face/R2F?
try Metal Face/R2F?
(Oct. 21, 2011 11:48 PM)Hazel Wrote: Just finished testing a Blitz variant, out of curiousity. It did startlingly well.
Blitz Unicorno II H145RF vs MF-H Basalt Aquario BD145CS
Blitz Unicorno II H145RF: 13 KO
MF-H Basalt Aquario BD145CS: 1 OS 6 KO
More than half of Blitz's KOs, however, were wall-saves.
(Oct. 22, 2011 12:06 AM)gibsonmac Wrote:(Oct. 21, 2011 11:48 PM)Hazel Wrote: Just finished testing a Blitz variant, out of curiousity. It did startlingly well.
Blitz Unicorno II H145RF vs MF-H Basalt Aquario BD145CS
Blitz Unicorno II H145RF: 13 KO
MF-H Basalt Aquario BD145CS: 1 OS 6 KO
More than half of Blitz's KOs, however, were wall-saves.
MF Blitz 100R2F can 100% on MFH Basalt BD145MB/CS
(Oct. 22, 2011 12:17 AM)Shabalabadoo Wrote: He's saying it's not worth using H145 over MF Blitz 100R2F.
(Oct. 22, 2011 12:23 AM)Shabalabadoo Wrote: It's about seeing if H145 is good enough to be used.
He said MF Blitz 100R2F does a lot better, so H145 isn't good enough to be used.
(Oct. 22, 2011 12:23 AM)Shabalabadoo Wrote: He said MF Blitz 100R2F does a lot better, so H145 isn't good enough to be used.
(Oct. 22, 2011 3:58 AM)Uwik Wrote: I just want to go on the record that I feel H145 is not a good part. Just because it sometimes produces eye-candy KOs doesn't make it a good part.
(Oct. 22, 2011 5:03 AM)gibsonmac Wrote: Why not Hell_H145RF vs Hell_R145RF?? Hell reveals a ton of track, so does flame and SagittarioIMO H145 should only be used on smash wheels that have two or four contact points, not 3. The point is to throw all of your weight onto each contact point and then have a gap in weight where there are no points. By doing 3 and 4, you've created 7 uneven contact points, which is not ideal.
(Oct. 22, 2011 3:59 PM)Deikailo Wrote:(Oct. 22, 2011 5:03 AM)gibsonmac Wrote: Why not Hell_H145RF vs Hell_R145RF?? Hell reveals a ton of track, so does flame and SagittarioIMO H145 should only be used on smash wheels that have two or four contact points, not 3. The point is to throw all of your weight onto each contact point and then have a gap in weight where there are no points. By doing 3 and 4, you've created 7 uneven contact points, which is not ideal.
A good example would be Blitz in barrage vs. Blitz in assault. Assault is better because it has more weight and mass behind each point.
(Oct. 22, 2011 5:20 PM)Janstarblast Wrote: Ah, good point that.Perseus is round enough to pass for any amount of contact points. There is Sag, lol.
But, I think Vulcan is the only ideal two sided Smash Wheel. Wait, even Quetz is there...
Otherwise, we have got no other wheels with 2 or 4 smash points...
Considering the two are outclassed, H145's use with those MW's would be kinda....... weird? :\
(Oct. 22, 2011 11:29 PM)gibsonmac Wrote: Well, the Italians have a different point of view, Leone and LLD H145RF were very popular, also Rock with H145 was used heavily, non of them have 2 or 4 contact points, 3's and 6-8 iirc... with a high speed (rotationally) bottom it could be used for a barrage attacker, like Blitz in barrage mode for instance, or carp maybe even try poison (as long as we are talking unconventional niche combos)Leone has like, 6 contact points, which is enough to make it fall under a more rounder smash wheel, but Leone is terrible outclassed. You're focusing too much on contact points than the weight factor I was trying to show. If a smash wheel is more circular (six or more points) then it really doesn't matter about throwing off the weight.
Alternatively, Jade has 4 contacts in attack mode it is sort of square-ish, Thermal, inferno, sagg, Phantom, vulcan should also be considered...
Phantom would be interesting as a 'H145, do work!' combo, high rotational velocity... something like Phantom Orion/bull/rex/cancer/any symmetrical CW H145XF/WF/MF... I think I may test this later tonight, but I got tattooed for 6 hours today so I'm kinda sore, but we'll see..