Constructive Criticism

Hello,

I am a consumer of your information. I would like to point out the the wiki just isn't as detailed as it has been in the past. I loved how detail beywiki is with MF and earlier, and there are very few information gaps. Comparing parts both in text, a multitude of shots and angles, spread sheets detailing bearing and shaft compatibility, and small pages like the Special parts page on the old wiki. I just find it odd how in an age when information was harder to come by, the pages are better.
(Jul. 23, 2021  1:02 AM)8-Bit Wolf Wrote: Hello,

I am a consumer of your information. I would like to point out the the wiki just isn't as detailed as it has been in the past. I loved how detail beywiki is with MF and earlier, and there are very few information gaps. Comparing parts both in text, a multitude of shots and angles, spread sheets detailing bearing and shaft compatibility, and small pages like the Special parts page on the old wiki. I just find it odd how in an age when information was harder to come by, the pages are better.
I know I'm a tad late, but in regards to prior generations having more detailed information, that's because there were actually editors in the community putting the time and effort into the detailed information you mentioned, which is sadly not the case with Burst.