World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. Beyblade Discussion Beyblade General

Beyblade Videos

Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM
 
(Dec. 29, 2010  10:54 PM)tman14 Wrote:
(Dec. 29, 2010  10:39 PM)Wraith Wrote:
(Dec. 29, 2010  1:48 AM)Wraith Wrote: Feedback please:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XWvxTS37AA

Why won't anyone say anything?

don't have a camera man :| be behind the camera to unbox it

EDIT: ROLF Medz XD


Epic Fail XDDDDD
and wraith i like your repies LOLWUT and maybe...
Dec. 30, 2010  3:52 AM
 
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote: Epic Fail XDDDDD

what?
Dec. 30, 2010  4:10 AM
 
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:52 AM)tman14 Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote: Epic Fail XDDDDD

what?

Its ROFL......
Dec. 30, 2010  4:29 AM
 
(Dec. 30, 2010  4:10 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:52 AM)tman14 Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote: Epic Fail XDDDDD

what?

Its ROFL......

elaborate? I always thought I knew what it meant but not exactly what it meant XD

EDIT: ok I changed it to LOL so whatever Serious
Dec. 30, 2010  11:29 AM
 
ROFL means rolling on floor laughing. <Off Topic.
Dec. 31, 2010  1:02 AM
 
My new video is the unboxing of Gravity Perseus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av52sfUhhvc
Dec. 31, 2010  1:08 AM
 
(Dec. 30, 2010  4:29 AM)tman14 Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  4:10 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:52 AM)tman14 Wrote:
(Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote: Epic Fail XDDDDD

what?

Its ROFL......

elaborate? I always thought I knew what it meant but not exactly what it meant XD

EDIT: ok I changed it to LOL so whatever Serious
Off Topic------> You said ROLF tman14, The Fire Wyrm was saying it's ROFL.
Dec. 31, 2010  1:09 AM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  1:02 AM)Jacksonian Wrote: My new video is the unboxing of Gravity Perseus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av52sfUhhvc

LOL.... That was hilarious.
Dec. 31, 2010  1:11 AM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  1:09 AM)Blaze Wheeler Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  1:02 AM)Jacksonian Wrote: My new video is the unboxing of Gravity Perseus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av52sfUhhvc

LOL.... That was hilarious.
he also got pokemon stickers with the bey lol
Dec. 31, 2010  10:07 AM
 
A bunch of terribly narrated unboxing videos by Diamond on the Beyblade Super Deck: (Click to View)

Yours sincerely,
Noseyplonk
Dec. 31, 2010  10:13 AM
 
part 2- 4:04 Oh carp I dropped the Libra face- Made my day lol.

Cool video.
Dec. 31, 2010  10:23 AM
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaYBuN5Poho

Uploaded a new Beyblade match with my new-ish Meteo L-Drago.
Dec. 31, 2010  10:26 AM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  10:07 AM)Diamond Wrote:
A bunch of terribly narrated unboxing videos by Diamond on the Beyblade Super Deck: (Click to View)

Yours sincerely,
Noseyplonk

You're talking! It's good to hear your actual voice,

So it seems like Diamond is actually talking in this video. It was nice to hear his voice, while he still lasted at least...

Thanks for the videos, Noseyplonk, but I just have one question: Why did you knife him?
Dec. 31, 2010  10:32 AM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  10:26 AM)OkiBlaze Wrote: Thanks for the videos, Noseyplonk, but I just have one question: Why did you knife him?
No particular reason, I just enjoy sneaking into a stranger's bedroom in the dead of night and knife him or her.

-Noseyplonk
Dec. 31, 2010  10:36 AM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  10:32 AM)Diamond Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  10:26 AM)OkiBlaze Wrote: Thanks for the videos, Noseyplonk, but I just have one question: Why did you knife him?
No particular reason, I just enjoy sneaking into a stranger's bedroom in the dead of night and knife him or her.

-Noseyplonk


Hide yo keeds, hide yo wifes, and hide yo husbands too cuz he be knifing errbody up in here.

Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zeA3Wk4S...re=related this dude has many launchers lol
Dec. 31, 2010  11:52 AM
 
I have no idea how he did this but damn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbxXz5luRYE
Dec. 31, 2010  4:19 PM
 
Burn Bull 230WD VS Burn Bull DF105WD -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61BL6990D4M
Dec. 31, 2010  5:06 PM
 
MF-H Libra GB145CS vs Burn Cancer 85R2F

I've noticed that Libra has quite a lot of recoil when it gets hit from below, this video just shows what even a mediocre Attack combo can do to it.
Obviously 5 battles isn't enough to prove anything, but if you see how high Libra gets hit up (most notably at 0:42 of the video when Burn has very little spin left) , you'll probably get an idea on how much recoil it has despite that the combo was extremely heavy.

This doesn't happen to Earth though. So I guess Libra against tall Attackers, Earth against low ones?
Dec. 31, 2010  5:15 PM
 
Nice Video Diamond. I noticed this same effect when I used Libra before it broke. I still think that combo isnt defense though. It should be attack.
Dec. 31, 2010  5:17 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:15 PM)Bluezee Wrote: I still think that combo isnt defense though. It should be attack.
CS, GB145 and MF-H are all Top-Tier Defense parts.
Libra was also a Top-Tier Defense Wheel before it was banned.

I really can't see how it could be Attack?
Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:17 PM)Diamond Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:15 PM)Bluezee Wrote: I still think that combo isnt defense though. It should be attack.
CS, GB145 and MF-H are all Top-Tier Defense parts.
Libra was also a Top-Tier Defense Wheel before it was banned.

I really can't see how it could be Attack?

CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.
Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.
CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.
Dec. 31, 2010  5:37 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.
CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

How are you so sure that it wasn't meant for attack? I mean, I see your logic seeing as how it could be used for stamina and attack, which was its intended purpose, but aren't beyblade types determined by their bottoms? I mean, people use RSF for defense but isn't it really supposed to be a balance combo? I wish there was a better way for me to show you what I mean.

Actually, a perfect example I can think of is Libra CH120RF. Labeled as balance but it is really an attack combo. Making any sense now?
Dec. 31, 2010  5:44 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:37 PM)Bluezee Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.
CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

How are you so sure that it wasn't meant for attack? I mean, I see your logic seeing as how it could be used for stamina and attack, which was its intended purpose, but aren't beyblade types determined by their bottoms? I mean, people use RSF for defense but isn't it really supposed to be a balance combo? I wish there was a better way for me to show you what I mean.

Actually, a perfect example I can think of is Libra CH120RF. Labeled as balance but it is really an attack combo. Making any sense now?

Note the word "Sharp" in "Coat Sharp." Sharp series bottoms don't really give a lot of attack.

Beys are never determined by one part alone. As a whole bey, the parts benefit in its performance and in each category in one way or another. MF Lightning LDrago 100CS isn't necessarily a defense type. Bottoms are an important part to a bey, yes, but it's the whole bey that creates the final verdict.

As to Libra CH120RF, the bey is designed to outspin regular attack combos and knock out stamina and defense types, making it a somewhat "Balance" type. Again, Libra provided the stamina, and CH120RF provided the attack. It's not all in one part.
Dec. 31, 2010  5:56 PM
 
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:44 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:37 PM)Bluezee Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:
(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.
CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

How are you so sure that it wasn't meant for attack? I mean, I see your logic seeing as how it could be used for stamina and attack, which was its intended purpose, but aren't beyblade types determined by their bottoms? I mean, people use RSF for defense but isn't it really supposed to be a balance combo? I wish there was a better way for me to show you what I mean.

Actually, a perfect example I can think of is Libra CH120RF. Labeled as balance but it is really an attack combo. Making any sense now?

Note the word "Sharp" in "Coat Sharp." Sharp series bottoms don't really give a lot of attack.

Beys are never determined by one part alone. As a whole bey, the parts benefit in its performance and in each category in one way or another. MF Lightning LDrago 100CS isn't necessarily a defense type. Bottoms are an important part to a bey, yes, but it's the whole bey that creates the final verdict.

As to Libra CH120RF, they bey is designed to outspin regular attack combos and knock out stamina and defense types, making it a somewhat "Balance" type. Again, Libra provided the stamina, and CH120RF provided the attack. It's not all in one part.

Libra CH120RF is clearly an attack type. That is what makes this all confusing. RF is used for attack meaning that the combo is an attack type if it moves as such. It was only labeled as a balance type based on a lack for a better term atm because Brad did not know what to call it. It has been shown to be an attacker. Libra may provide stamina but that is like saying just because flame has more stamina than storm on RF, Flame___100RF is more inclined to be a balance type than Storm___100RF. Attack is attack IMO. Also, if that is the case, then are you saying that something like Burn GB145RF is a balance combo? I mean, just as you said with Libra, it provides stamina, weight which could be used to say its for defense, and RF provides attack. Is that your logic?
Prev
Page 127
Next